HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #21  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2014, 6:37 AM
Crawford Crawford is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 30,698
Quote:
Originally Posted by quantj View Post
Scalziand: that's also a hypothetical model for a project Macklowe is building at the corner of Second Avenue and 59th. It's said to be fairly tall.
Interesting. I didn't know Macklowe was planning a tower on Second Avenue. So he has at least two new towers planned for the Upper East Side, following completion of 432 Park.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2014, 9:14 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,821
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crawford View Post
Yeah, but that Cityrealty image isn't based on anything. It's just a placeholder based on news reports. We have no idea of height, design, or anything.
That's why I said "a potential tower". It's meant to show a large tower massing on site.




Quote:
Originally Posted by quantj View Post
Hi guys. I'm the creator of these models and I appreciate all your commentary. These threads have been a supreme resource in helping me keep the models updated for ongoing projects, the models are based on the building diagrams and drawings submitted by the developers to the city. But as you all know, there are many projects with unreleased designs so I left placeholders at those sites.

Scalziand: that's also a hypothetical model for a project Macklowe is building at the corner of Second Avenue and 59th. It's said to be fairly tall. Also, the World-Wide tower at the corner of 60th and Lexington is also a hypothetical massing model (just approximated at around 800') and there's another massing volume in the foreground at 1059 Third Avenue which is around 500' tall. I'll accurately replace them all once a rendering is uncovered.

I have most of the Hudson Yards and Downtown towers done and can't wait to share those with you soon.

Sorry if the models are not 100% accurate like the developer's renders, but I don't have access to the full building plans, often all I have are zoning diagrams showing general massing, overall building height and the official released render(s), so that makes it pretty tricky to get it perfect. But for an overall view of NYC, I think it's a pretty decent model of the city.

They are fantastic renders, and really give us an idea of the scale of changes coming to Manhattan and beyond.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23  
Old Posted Jun 4, 2015, 10:36 PM
JR Ewing JR Ewing is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Ancient Egypt
Posts: 835
Awesome news, lads. WW was not up to par to develop this site's potential. Hopefully, the buyer will get the corner site on Lex.

http://therealdeal.com/blog/2015/06/...on-the-market/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #24  
Old Posted Jun 4, 2015, 10:49 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Riverview Estates Fairway (PA)
Posts: 45,769
Those extra air rights will help. A thin ultra-luxury tower seems reasonable. 900-1000' approximately with a serious developer.

But even then, it could go higher.

Wheres Barnett when you need him.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #25  
Old Posted Jun 5, 2015, 7:00 AM
aquablue aquablue is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,741
I'm actually glad Barnett won't be developing this tower. His designs are so far rather uninspired. Nordstrom, a rather missed opportunity to develop something beautiful in a prime viewing location, has made me want to see less of him.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #26  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2015, 12:49 PM
Vertical_Gotham's Avatar
Vertical_Gotham Vertical_Gotham is offline
N40° 46.8925', W073° 57.3
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 300
Kuafu to buy UES development site for north of $300M
http://therealdeal.com/blog/2015/06/...north-of-300m/




Quote:
Kuafu Properties is in contract to pay north of $300 million for six contiguous Upper East Side properties on a site that would accommodate a large residential development, The Real Deal has learned.

Earlier this month, World Wide Group put the group of largely mixed-use, low-rise buildings at 143-161 East 60th Street, between Lexington and Third avenues, on the market. The site, located across the street from the Bloomingdale’s flagship, offers over 280,000 buildable square feet above grade. The buildings sit on a roughly 20,000 square-foot-lot.

Kuafu, a New York-based Chinese development firm, entered contract for about $1,100 per square foot last week, according to sources familiar with the deal. Although sources said Kuafu will likely build condominiums, its plans are unclear, as it couldn’t be reached for comment.

A Cushman & Wakefield team led by Bob Knakal, Helen Hwang and Clint Olsen marketed the site as a possible redevelopment into a condominium tower that would rise as high as 1,000 feet and contain a retail component.

The Cushman brokers and World Wide Group were not immediately available for comment.

The five-story building at 143 East 60th Street was best known for housing the iconic dive bar Subway Inn until it shuttered late last year.

World Wide Group, a Midtown East-based development firm founded by Victor Elmaleh and now led by James Stanton, acquired the properties over a nine-year period starting in 2005, records show. The biggest single-building buy was the $37 million deal last year for the 11-story commercial property at 155-161 East 60th Street.

Then, last year, the firm paid $8.9 million for the buildings’ collective development rights.

Kuafu is developing Hudson Rise, a proposed Hudson Yards condo-hotel, but is in the midst of a legal dispute with its former business partner Siras Development.
Kids, Only in New York. Only in New York that a property for $300m is taken off the market in 1 week.
__________________
See my Hudson Yards Map
http://i.imgur.com/FVrYwpy.jpg
(Once in, Click image to enlarge)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #27  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2015, 12:50 PM
sparkling's Avatar
sparkling sparkling is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 765
DELETE: VG posted it a minute before me.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #28  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2015, 1:07 PM
JR Ewing JR Ewing is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Ancient Egypt
Posts: 835
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vertical_Gotham View Post
Kuafu to buy UES development site for north of $300M
http://therealdeal.com/blog/2015/06/...north-of-300m/






Kids, Only in New York. Only in New York that a property for $300m is taken off the market in 1 week.
I agree, VG.

This is the Age of Ramses!

I hope that Kaufu gets the property on Lex.

Last edited by JR Ewing; Jun 18, 2015 at 1:55 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #29  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2015, 1:49 PM
Hypothalamus's Avatar
Hypothalamus Hypothalamus is offline
Homo sapiens sapiens
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: 3rd planet from the Sun
Posts: 1,666
Quote:
Originally Posted by JR Ewing View Post
I hope that Kaufu gets the property on Lex.
Agreed
__________________
“If I have done the public any service, it is due to my patient thought.” ― Isaac Newton

~ My Stamford, CT Thread ~~ My Danbury, CT Thread ~
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #30  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2015, 5:42 PM
Vertical_Gotham's Avatar
Vertical_Gotham Vertical_Gotham is offline
N40° 46.8925', W073° 57.3
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 300
I Agree fellas. That building would be an eyesore if it's not razed. Go get It Kaufu!
__________________
See my Hudson Yards Map
http://i.imgur.com/FVrYwpy.jpg
(Once in, Click image to enlarge)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2015, 8:53 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Riverview Estates Fairway (PA)
Posts: 45,769
What it will replace:




Credit: Jeremiah Budin

Quote:
Originally Posted by JR Ewing View Post
I agree, VG.

This is the Age of Ramses!

I hope that Kaufu gets the property on Lex.
You got me saying now. Again, this is the Age of Ramses! (Holds up beer while saying it)

Quote:
marketed the site as a possible redevelopment into a condominium tower that would rise as high as 1,000 feet and contain a retail component.
So many mid rise towers now. For NYC, this is a mid rise!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #32  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2015, 4:09 PM
Vertical_Gotham's Avatar
Vertical_Gotham Vertical_Gotham is offline
N40° 46.8925', W073° 57.3
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 300
I wonder if this was the site, WWG had tapped Cetra Ruddy to design this site. Could have this been that mysterious "Upper East Side" tower that Cetra Ruddy was alluding too?

Anyways, this outgoing design below would have been interesting.

__________________
See my Hudson Yards Map
http://i.imgur.com/FVrYwpy.jpg
(Once in, Click image to enlarge)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2015, 4:51 PM
Sky88's Avatar
Sky88 Sky88 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 379
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2015, 5:32 PM
Vertical_Gotham's Avatar
Vertical_Gotham Vertical_Gotham is offline
N40° 46.8925', W073° 57.3
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 300
^^

Fantastic. I wouldn't mind at all if this design was retained. Love the little setbacks of that copperish tower. The façade reminds me of Gehry's 8 Spruce Street. Kinda looks like something SHoP would design.

Love this profile of the tower. Very Gotham imo.

__________________
See my Hudson Yards Map
http://i.imgur.com/FVrYwpy.jpg
(Once in, Click image to enlarge)

Last edited by Vertical_Gotham; Jun 19, 2015 at 5:49 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #35  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2015, 5:51 PM
tdawg's Avatar
tdawg tdawg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Astoria, NY
Posts: 2,937
ah, so this is the tower that the Subway Inn dive bar was forced to move for. I approve.
__________________
From my head via my fingers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2015, 5:52 PM
JR Ewing JR Ewing is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Ancient Egypt
Posts: 835
Holy Boehner! I hope that Kuafu uses this design!!

This is the Age of Ranses, lads!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #37  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2015, 6:13 PM
Hypothalamus's Avatar
Hypothalamus Hypothalamus is offline
Homo sapiens sapiens
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: 3rd planet from the Sun
Posts: 1,666
Nice, so air rights (w/ inclusionary housing bonus) total 282,925 square feet (above grade) under the current assemblage. An air rights transfer from 767 Lexington would bump to 294,795 square feet. An acquisition/demolition of 767 Lexington (using inc. housing FAR 12) would bump to 317,850 square feet towards zoning.
__________________
“If I have done the public any service, it is due to my patient thought.” ― Isaac Newton

~ My Stamford, CT Thread ~~ My Danbury, CT Thread ~
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #38  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2015, 8:07 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Riverview Estates Fairway (PA)
Posts: 45,769
Looks like its about 950' as its almost at level with the Bloomberg Tower pinnacle. But at that angle, perception wise, I think its safe to say 950-1000'.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #39  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2015, 11:38 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,821
Flexibility in design would allow for a supertall.


Quote:
Adjacent to Billionaire’s Row, the site provides prospective developers the opportunity to construct a global icon that will undoubtedly attract elite residential purchasers and draw top retail and commercial tenants from around the globe.

Flexible zoning offers a first-class residential and commercial development opportunity in one of Manhattan’s most prominent zip codes. Due to the unlimited height potential, expansive lot size, and desirable location, development of this property will alter the Manhattan skyline and become one of the city’s tallest structures that will offer panoramic views of Central Park, Manhattan, and beyond.
http://masseyknakal.com/pressrelease...9781527297.pdf






__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #40  
Old Posted Jul 27, 2015, 9:23 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Riverview Estates Fairway (PA)
Posts: 45,769
Kuafu Properties plans to turn the six-building location on East 60th Street into condominiums



Quote:
Kuafu Properties, a New York-based Chinese investment firm formed two years ago, plans to build a condominium tower at the Upper East Side site that once housed the Subway Inn dive bar.

The company signed a contract to buy the property on East 60th Street, near Lexington Avenue, from World Wide Group, Chief Executive Officer Shang Dai said in an interview. Kuafu intends to demolish the buildings at the site and add about 60,000 square feet (5,570 square meters) of retail space in its ground-up project, he said.

The deal is the fourth in Manhattan for the company, whose name means "beyond wealth" in Chinese. This month, Kuafu agreed to buy One MiMA Tower, a luxury rental property on West 42nd Street that it plans to convert to condos. Chinese investment in New York real estate has surged in the past two years, with deals including Anbang Insurance Group Co.'s $1.95 billion purchase of the Waldorf Astoria hotel and the sale of 1 Chase Manhattan Plaza to Fosun International Ltd. for $725 million.

"In the long run, Chinese investment in U.S. will definitely grow stronger," Mr. Dai said in the interview in his Times Square office. "It is only the beginning of Chinese capital investing abroad, while the U.S., with its active market and robust economy, undoubtedly is the first choice."

The purchase of the East 60th Street property is scheduled to close in October, said Mr. Dai, who wouldn't disclose the price. Kuafu agreed to pay $300 million for the six-building site at 143-161 E. 60th St., according to a person with knowledge of the deal, who asked not to be named because the details are private.
======================
http://www.crainsnewyork.com/article...ation-for-300m
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:21 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.