Quote:
Originally Posted by Urbanthusiat
There’s more risk is doing one big investment rather than several smaller ones. Getting one big project done means you have to line up more tenants before starting construction, and getting them all on board and getting the initial sign-one to stay with you as you can’t give them a set timeline when you’ll start is a bit like herding cats. You can also create value by creating a neighborhood and a sense of place, whereas if you build a single tower, you still have a lot of empty neighborhood which makes it feel dead. There’s probably a few other reasons too, but if supertalls were easy we’d see more of them.
|
Hupp and Chop have both built short towers that were engineered to be doubled in height if the need, resources, desire, etc. ever came together. I don't know what the added costs are to do that, but I've wondered why that isn't done on commercial buildings. Since Chop is land locked and even their east side property is limited in growth, I worry if planning for upward expansion won't turn out to be the smart thing to do.