HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #5721  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2016, 5:55 PM
KWILLSKYLINE's Avatar
KWILLSKYLINE KWILLSKYLINE is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 625
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamInTheLoop View Post
This is the same - or very similar - rendering that I saw about 4 or 5 months back. From what I've heard, Howard Hughes wants to move on this redevelopment and is actively showing this to prospective anchor tenants. It's all office, from what I understand (to BVic's question)......I too noticed a little echo of 191 N......don't know who the architect is, but wonder if it might be KPF.....


I like it. Just dont slap a giant UBS on the side of the crown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5722  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2016, 6:04 PM
Tom In Chicago's Avatar
Tom In Chicago Tom In Chicago is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Sick City
Posts: 6,677
[MODERATOR NOTE]

Just another reminder that we do not post images, links, references or anything related to Yo-Chicago. . . they are NOT our friends. . .

Thank you for your cooperation

. . .
__________________
Tom in Chicago
. . .
Near the day of Purification, there will be cobwebs spun back and forth in the sky.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5723  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2016, 11:05 PM
Rizzo Rizzo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,023
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamInTheLoop View Post
This is the same - or very similar - rendering that I saw about 4 or 5 months back. From what I've heard, Howard Hughes wants to move on this redevelopment and is actively showing this to prospective anchor tenants. It's all office, from what I understand (to BVic's question)......I too noticed a little echo of 191 N......don't know who the architect is, but wonder if it might be KPF.....
Isn't there a lawsuit stalling this thing?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5724  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2016, 5:59 AM
Kumdogmillionaire's Avatar
Kumdogmillionaire Kumdogmillionaire is offline
Development Shill
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,116
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hayward View Post
Isn't there a lawsuit stalling this thing?
Yeah last I heard the owners were in disagreement in what to do with the property. Definitely a proposal in deep limbo
__________________
For you - Bane
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5725  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2016, 3:04 PM
spyguy's Avatar
spyguy spyguy is offline
THAT Guy
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,949
Ickes redevelopment






Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5726  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2016, 3:37 PM
ChickeNES's Avatar
ChickeNES ChickeNES is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 442
^Holy shit
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5727  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2016, 3:43 PM
Kippis's Avatar
Kippis Kippis is offline
Chicagoland Runaway
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Winfield, IL
Posts: 238
^ Agreed. Much better than I expected. Quite surprised by this one.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5728  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2016, 4:29 PM
UPChicago's Avatar
UPChicago UPChicago is offline
Vote for me for Mayor!
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 784
Yes please
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5729  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2016, 4:47 PM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 9,787
^If it's less than 738 units, then it'll be less dense than the previous inception before there was a green line stop there.

Spyguy, any guess on the unit count?
__________________
titanic1
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5730  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2016, 5:33 PM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,359
Ickes

I like it. Who's the architect behind this, and will they actually be designing most/all of the buildings, or is this mostly placeholder type stuff, and individual building design tbd later??
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5731  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2016, 5:37 PM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,359
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kumdogmillionaire View Post
Yeah last I heard the owners were in disagreement in what to do with the property. Definitely a proposal in deep limbo

Is that still unresolved?

The backstory was that Development Resources, Inc. (smaller local outfit) was claiming that Howard Hughes was cutting them out of the land deal, IIRC (reported in Crain's a year or two back I think)..........DRI's website is good for a hearty laugh or three for those interested to take a look (in some of their 'project' descriptions, they recount moving a bunch of furniture for a tenant into a new space, and also how their contractor shoveled snow by hand to speed-up a timeline......weird, weird stuff......
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5732  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2016, 5:46 PM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 9,787
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamInTheLoop View Post
I like it. Who's the architect behind this, and will they actually be designing most/all of the buildings, or is this mostly placeholder type stuff, and individual building design tbd later??
Antunovich Associates

Quote:
BVictor1: If it's less than 738 units, then it'll be less dense than the previous inception before there was a green line stop there.

Spyguy, any guess on the unit count?
http://chicago.curbed.com/2016/10/25...ld-ickes-homes

Quote:
According to reports, the redevelopment will encompass four phases totaling 867 units across the site’s three square blocks. The project’s first tranche is expected to include 319 units of mixed-income housing (94 public, 58 affordable rate, and 167 market rate) plus new retail and commercial space. Work is expected to begin in the third quarter of 2017.
So 100 more units than the previous development. MEH... Just bump it up to 1,000.
__________________
titanic1
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5733  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2016, 6:15 PM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,359
Wow - Antunovich? So, very nearby, we have that also decent hotel design from them, now this......on they perhaps on the cusp of maybe, just maybe turning a corner?
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5734  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2016, 6:19 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 5,854
Let me take your attention for two seconds - 1411 S Michigan Ave was issued a building permit yesterday. That's the 199 unit, 15 story building --> http://chicago.curbed.com/2016/7/11/...partment-tower
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5735  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2016, 6:53 PM
moorhosj moorhosj is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 511
Quote:
Originally Posted by BVictor1 View Post
So 100 more units than the previous development. MEH... Just bump it up to 1,000.
There is virtually nothing on the east side of State Street. Plenty of room for density there after this development improves the immediate area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5736  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2016, 6:57 PM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 9,787
Quote:
Originally Posted by moorhosj View Post
There is virtually nothing on the east side of State Street. Plenty of room for density there after this development improves the immediate area.
But still...

And there are about 650 units in Hilliard currently.
__________________
titanic1

Last edited by BVictor1; Oct 25, 2016 at 7:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5737  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2016, 7:58 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 20,819
^ I think there are plenty of chances to add a lot of density to that area. One step at a time
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5738  
Old Posted Oct 26, 2016, 1:00 PM
Mr Roboto Mr Roboto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chi 60616
Posts: 3,577
I'm very excited about the Ickes redevelopment, looks great. I actually wasn't expecting something this dense anyway, nor any solid plans anytime soon, so Ill take it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5739  
Old Posted Oct 26, 2016, 2:46 PM
rlw777 rlw777 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,742
Ickes proposal looks great!
South Loop is in the middle of a HUGE transformation. The next decade is going to be busy with Riverline, Ickes, Rezko and all the buildings proposed near grant park.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5740  
Old Posted Oct 26, 2016, 2:55 PM
UPChicago's Avatar
UPChicago UPChicago is offline
Vote for me for Mayor!
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 784
don't look here lol

Last edited by UPChicago; Oct 26, 2016 at 3:07 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:03 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.