HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #581  
Old Posted May 6, 2020, 3:19 AM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,274
I just love the passionate response form forumers here. Lol.

Here:

https://vancouver.ca/home-property-d...-district.aspx

By the way, this area does have a really strict height limit despite no mountain views from Champlain heights.

Not saying the pace of development in this area is totally bad, but it should be much bolder, planned and developed like one of the four town centres in Burnaby. Vancouver loves boring sleepy tired-looking neighbourhoods. I can name a few: Kerrisdale, Joyce-Collingwood, and the River District. If Metro Van had been amalgamated in the early 1900s, I can imagine how it would be like today: A sleepy city with low density suburbs sprawling all the way to Hope: all with their own distinct Viewcone corridors.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #582  
Old Posted May 6, 2020, 5:40 AM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 8,386
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheba View Post
Also Landmark at New West Station. I wouldn't be terribly surprised if River District does their own outdoor screen on nice summer evenings (limited to the residents - not a commercial thing).
Keep forgetting about that one. Thanks. And yes, if OV Square is large enough for an inflatable screen, any of the park spaces would do just fine.

Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
COVID19 could be the end of movie theaters. The expense, the hassle, the continuous improvement to home setups, non-traditional distribution (Netflix).

The business model is old and the final days are here.
Might kill a lot of the B-movies, but I think there's always going to be a market for big screens with big audiences. Stuff like Avatar and Endgame doesn't always have the same impact from home.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #583  
Old Posted May 6, 2020, 4:33 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 3,671
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vin View Post
I just love the passionate response form forumers here. Lol.

Here:

https://vancouver.ca/home-property-d...-district.aspx

By the way, this area does have a really strict height limit despite no mountain views from Champlain heights.

Not saying the pace of development in this area is totally bad, but it should be much bolder, planned and developed like one of the four town centres in Burnaby. Vancouver loves boring sleepy tired-looking neighbourhoods. I can name a few: Kerrisdale, Joyce-Collingwood, and the River District. If Metro Van had been amalgamated in the early 1900s, I can imagine how it would be like today: A sleepy city with low density suburbs sprawling all the way to Hope: all with their own distinct Viewcone corridors.
Agreed, if there was more "disposable land" owned by a select few of larger corporations along rapid transit we'd see the same development. This is in a poor location for that and I think the City recognized that without a "green light" by TransLink.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #584  
Old Posted May 6, 2020, 11:13 PM
VancouverOfTheFuture's Avatar
VancouverOfTheFuture VancouverOfTheFuture is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 3,275
i still find it odd that in a city going on about density and climate change and no cars, all biking and transit...

that they let this get built, in the middle of nowhere, far from transit, on low lying land that is more likely to flood. it is the complete opposite of everything they preach.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #585  
Old Posted May 6, 2020, 11:16 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 3,671
Quote:
Originally Posted by VancouverOfTheFuture View Post
i still find it odd that in a city going on about density and climate change and no cars, all biking and transit...

that they let this get built, in the middle of nowhere, far from transit, on low lying land that is more likely to flood. it is the complete opposite of everything they preach.
It's been updated through the years with climate resilience in mind, as well as massive amounts of bike, walking, and local shopping infrastructure / design in mind.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #586  
Old Posted May 7, 2020, 12:20 AM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 8,386
Quote:
Originally Posted by VancouverOfTheFuture View Post
i still find it odd that in a city going on about density and climate change and no cars, all biking and transit...

that they let this get built, in the middle of nowhere, far from transit, on low lying land that is more likely to flood. it is the complete opposite of everything they preach.
I get the feeling that the City sees this as more of a pilot program for transit-starved SFH neighbourhoods. Marpole, Sunset or Dunbar might look like the RD pretty soon.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #587  
Old Posted May 7, 2020, 12:25 AM
VancouverOfTheFuture's Avatar
VancouverOfTheFuture VancouverOfTheFuture is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 3,275
Quote:
Originally Posted by GenWhy? View Post
It's been updated through the years with climate resilience in mind, as well as massive amounts of bike, walking, and local shopping infrastructure / design in mind.
yes, they're building berms. they don't build dykes, that would require more money, so just berms. i remember hearing about that.

i guess we will see how this turns out in 20yrs. its already been 12yrs, and it doesn't seem like it is very well served.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #588  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2020, 8:48 PM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,347
I think River District is shaping up to be a solid neighbourhood. Despite being brand new it has achieved a bit of character with a diversity of housing types, massing and materials. Walking through the Town Centre my friend and I agreed that it felt cozy almost. Lack of transit access is the area's biggest downfall but at least they've included a stop within the town centre.

My pics from yesterday.







Reply With Quote
     
     
  #589  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2020, 8:54 PM
djmk's Avatar
djmk djmk is offline
victory in near
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Vancouver
Posts: 1,573
looks nice. thanks for sharing
__________________
i have no idea what's going on
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #590  
Old Posted Oct 8, 2020, 9:54 PM
Feathered Friend Feathered Friend is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,190
3350 Marine Way – DP-2020-00467 – EFL Parcel 14 - UDP & DP Approved





















Quote:
Urban Design Panel Helps River District Rental Homes Find Vancouver’s Doorway To Approval

3350 Marine Way – DP-2020-00467 – EFL Parcel 14
One thing the East Fraser Lands has taught Hannah and I is the need to be flexible, as even the best laid plans can’t stand up to the unexpected demands of the future. Thirty years ago, surface parking lots were the norm, and our region’s leader planned to spread a series of office hubs across Metro Vancouver. Today, even with the pandemic, most companies are still embracing the synergies of Downtown (pg 3), and green space is prioritized over asphalt.

Fortunately this area plan was reviewed back in 2017, and already this town centre has seen some changes, like the shift of the tower on Parcel 13 that’s adjacent to this one. That brought in more sunlight, but has blunted the flatiron corner of this site that was originally envisioned as an office building. That, along with the switch to rental housing, has required a new response, which was generally well received by the Urban Design Panel.....

.....Unfortunately, even though the official minutes of this review haven’t been posted on the city’s website, it’s now too late to express your thoughts. That’s because this application was recently approved yesterday (October 7th 2020), by the Director of Planning, with several conditions that reflect the panel’s instructions.
More info at
https://cityduo.wordpress.com/2020/1...y-to-approval/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #591  
Old Posted Oct 8, 2020, 10:20 PM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,100
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feathered Friend View Post
Go home, architect. You're drunk (with pretentiousness).
__________________
If it seems I'm ignoring what you may have written in response to something I have written, it's very likely that you're on my Ignore List. Please do not take it personally.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #592  
Old Posted Oct 8, 2020, 10:31 PM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 8,386
Merits of the design aside, this indeed looks nothing like a fish.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #593  
Old Posted Oct 9, 2020, 12:19 AM
officedweller officedweller is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 38,329
If you twisted a sturgeon like that you'd kill it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #594  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2021, 5:42 AM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,347
My pics from earlier today.







Reply With Quote
     
     
  #595  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2021, 1:46 PM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,141
1.5 million sq. ft. of additional homes proposed for Vancouver's River District
Kenneth Chan Feb 9 2021

existing


Proposed changes to the OCP


https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/rive...-proposal-2021
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #596  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2021, 5:16 PM
spacebjorn spacebjorn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 79
Interesting.

The proposed new area is built on very very shallow, flood plains. I'm curious how they'd build the high-rise (~16 stories) so close to the water especially given no real dyke system are in place unlike Richmond.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #597  
Old Posted May 14, 2021, 6:52 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,141
went for a walk in the area took some pics, its a very lively area now compared to a few years ago. Its got a nice vibe developing to it.

i like this one
2021-05-13_11-32-08 by snub_you, on Flickr

2021-05-13_11-32-22 by snub_you, on Flickr

2021-05-13_11-32-40 by snub_you, on Flickr

2021-05-13_11-32-54 by snub_you, on Flickr

2021-05-13_11-33-07 by snub_you, on Flickr

2021-05-13_11-33-19 by snub_you, on Flickr

2021-05-13_11-33-32 by snub_you, on Flickr

2021-05-13_11-34-16 by snub_you, on Flickr

2021-05-13_11-35-23 by snub_you, on Flickr

2021-05-13_11-35-36 by snub_you, on Flickr

2021-05-13_11-35-41 by snub_you, on Flickr

2021-05-13_11-35-46 by snub_you, on Flickr

2021-05-13_11-35-51 by snub_you, on Flickr

2021-05-13_11-35-57 by snub_you, on Flickr

doesn't really show the same on camera as in person but the copper part is really shiny
2021-05-13_11-36-20 by snub_you, on Flickr

2021-05-13_11-36-47 by snub_you, on Flickr

2021-05-13_11-37-02 by snub_you, on Flickr

2021-05-13_11-37-15 by snub_you, on Flickr

2021-05-13_11-37-27 by snub_you, on Flickr

2021-05-13_11-37-32 by snub_you, on Flickr

2021-05-13_11-37-37 by snub_you, on Flickr

2021-05-13_11-37-43 by snub_you, on Flickr

2021-05-13_11-37-48 by snub_you, on Flickr

2021-05-13_11-37-54 by snub_you, on Flickr

2021-05-13_11-37-59 by snub_you, on Flickr

2021-05-13_11-38-04 by snub_you, on Flickr

2021-05-13_11-38-09 by snub_you, on Flickr

2021-05-13_11-38-15 by snub_you, on Flickr

2021-05-13_11-38-15 by snub_you, on Flickr

2021-05-13_11-38-20 by snub_you, on Flickr
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #598  
Old Posted May 14, 2021, 11:01 PM
officedweller officedweller is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 38,329
Thanks for the tour.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #599  
Old Posted May 15, 2021, 1:26 AM
giallo's Avatar
giallo giallo is offline
be nice to the crackheads
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 11,530
Great tour. I barely recognize it now.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #600  
Old Posted May 15, 2021, 12:48 PM
Zepfancouver's Avatar
Zepfancouver Zepfancouver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,771
Thanks for that walk down memory lane. Cored hundreds of holes on these sites for 3 years on Parcel 15 - 16 -17- 19 - 20 and 21.
Enjoyed working with the people there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:06 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.