HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #921  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2012, 4:41 AM
Hed Kandi's Avatar
Hed Kandi Hed Kandi is offline
+
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 8,164
Quote:
Originally Posted by phesto View Post
That's not an MCMP design...
But it does look like a Thom Mayne design.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #922  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2012, 5:27 AM
dleung's Avatar
dleung dleung is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 5,968
Quote:
Originally Posted by dleung View Post
It's actually 31 stories ON TOP of the 11 stories in the existing building, for a total height of 42 stories and 540 feet, which is perfect for the location. Floorplates range from 14,000sf to 9000sf at the top, which is still larger than at MNP tower. The bulk of the new tower structure will replace the parkade next to 1090, but regular office floors don't begin until level 12. The existing building will undergo a seismic upgrade, with the first 2 floors (where Purolator is) reclad in spider-glass curtain wall to suit high end retail. It's a similar type building to 900 Hastings where Chanel is, and so will go through a similar upgrade.

It's the best of all worlds!

concept design images
Yeah I lied... again (http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/show...=186381&page=5).

It's just that whenever I read about what sounds like a tremendous waste of design potential (in this case, waste of existing architecture and waste of buildable air space), I can't help but spend half an hour whipping something together in photoshop. Even if only to remind you of how sucky it turned out to be and what could have been, once the real renders are released.

It was not meant to look like Phare tower, I was just being lazy and overlayed some facade texture into the massing I wanted for the site. To me, the massing is most important. But who knows... with Telus, my hoax turned out to have the exact same massing - right down to the podium - as the real proposal.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #923  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2012, 5:57 AM
Sir Conga's Avatar
Sir Conga Sir Conga is offline
Be nice.
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 353
For some reason the second image reminds me of this.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #924  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2012, 7:35 PM
wrenegade's Avatar
wrenegade wrenegade is offline
ON3P Skis
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Lower Lonsdale, North Vancouver, BC
Posts: 2,593
I was speaking to someone from Stantec who is working with UBC on doing a reno/expansion of their Robson Square space and he mentioned that the awful awful pagodas *might be disappearing. I know I have my fingers crossed, but we'll have to see what happens.
__________________
Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #925  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2012, 8:04 PM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,186
I don't find the pagodas themselves awful, but they should remove the awful tags some idiot has tarnished the southern pagoda glass with. It always hits me whenever I walk by, as it's such a visible place.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #926  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2012, 6:47 PM
Spork's Avatar
Spork Spork is offline
Shoebox Dweller
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,784
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrenegade View Post
I was speaking to someone from Stantec who is working with UBC on doing a reno/expansion of their Robson Square space and he mentioned that the awful awful pagodas *might be disappearing. I know I have my fingers crossed, but we'll have to see what happens.
Let him know that he has a lot of free labour available on here if that will help keep project costs to an acceptable level.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #927  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2013, 9:47 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 12,629
Hey guys, just saw the preliminary designs of a new office building for downtown. It's a LONG way from coming to fruition but the initial concepts/ideas seemed really cool.

Nothing to tall (top of the table kinda thing) but designed by what I would consider an international starchitect.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #928  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2013, 10:46 PM
Prometheus's Avatar
Prometheus Prometheus is offline
Reason and Freedom
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Vancouver/Toronto
Posts: 4,015
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeftCoaster View Post

Hey guys, just saw the preliminary designs of a new office building for downtown. It's a LONG way from coming to fruition but the initial concepts/ideas seemed really cool.

Nothing to tall (top of the table kinda thing) but designed by what I would consider an international starchitect.
Thank you for the information.

But I find it more depressing than exciting to see an otherwise promising tower get castrated by viewcones or some other Vancouver-made reason.

Last edited by Prometheus; Mar 8, 2013 at 12:30 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #929  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2013, 10:47 PM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,100
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeftCoaster View Post
Hey guys, just saw the preliminary designs of a new office building for downtown. It's a LONG way from coming to fruition but the initial concepts/ideas seemed really cool.

Nothing to tall (top of the table kinda thing) but designed by what I would consider an international starchitect.
Why is it that I come to this website hoping it's like a peeler bar, but the peelers are all dressed like nuns?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #930  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2013, 3:07 AM
jsbertram jsbertram is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by s211 View Post
Why is it that I come to this website hoping it's like a peeler bar, but the peelers are all dressed like nuns?
out of habit, perhaps?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #931  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2013, 4:34 PM
red-paladin red-paladin is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 3,626
hawhaw
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #932  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2013, 9:05 PM
djh djh is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,934
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeftCoaster View Post
Hey guys, just saw the preliminary designs of a new office building for downtown. It's a LONG way from coming to fruition but the initial concepts/ideas seemed really cool.

Nothing to tall (top of the table kinda thing) but designed by what I would consider an international starchitect.
Hmm, I remember very similar comments about multiple other towers:
"Hey, can't say much now, but there's going to be a fantastic tower going up in the city in the near future..."
Inevitably a rendering appears.
It gets dumbed-down by various committes.

We eventually get: Ta-Da...The Rolston ("It's gonna be a Jenga Building!"), or Marine Drive Gateway ("It's like staggered horizontal Jenga blocks!"), or the hotel Georgia ("It's like glass cubes...that look like Jenga!"). And on and on.

So whilst I still hold *some* optimism because there are one or two buildings that made it through this process of removing all creativity, as they say, I'll believe it when I see it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #933  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2013, 9:42 PM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
Ferris Wheel Hater
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,371
Think members need to pay more attention to who says the things, instead of just what is said... I tend to trust LeftCoaster's voice on these matters as he's shown to be be quite trustworthy over the years.
I know i seldom make comments about future projects being spectacular just because of the amount of criticism on this board. The only exception I can think of on my part was the BIG proposal for Howe St.
There is one more upcoming project that I feel will land into that category but it's still much to early in the process to release details on.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #934  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2013, 1:06 AM
red-paladin red-paladin is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 3,626
LeftCoaster also just said it seemed really cool.

He didn't say it was a 250m violet glass curtainwalled cylinder with a retail and office podium, that was gauranteed to have no Subways, nail salons and banks, but only counterculture record stores and foodie restaurants.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #935  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2013, 1:28 AM
Jebby's Avatar
Jebby Jebby is offline
........
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Mexico City
Posts: 3,307
Quote:
Originally Posted by red-paladin View Post
LeftCoaster also just said it seemed really cool.

He didn't say it was a 250m violet glass curtainwalled cylinder with a retail and office podium, that was gauranteed to have no Subways, nail salons and banks, but only counterculture record stores and foodie restaurants.
And an observation deck with green roof.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #936  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2013, 9:14 PM
dreambrother808 dreambrother808 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,001
Awesome. Love that design.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #937  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2013, 9:55 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 38,309
Nice.
Is that the Oxford tower on Melville?
Or the one on Pender @ Thurlow?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #938  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2013, 6:22 AM
EastVanMark EastVanMark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,604
If recent history teaches us anything, if it is a shorter, smaller building it might have some interesting design features. If its anything taller, then it must be a plain rectangle with clear or green glass. If you're really living on the edge Vancouver style, it MIGHT even include...wait for it... a PROTRUDING BOX!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #939  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2013, 4:29 PM
theKB theKB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 904
Quote:
Originally Posted by EastVanMark View Post
If recent history teaches us anything, if it is a shorter, smaller building it might have some interesting design features. If its anything taller, then it must be a plain rectangle with clear or green glass. If you're really living on the edge Vancouver style, it MIGHT even include...wait for it... a PROTRUDING BOX!
this is the truth

I don't get why it's so tough to allow for interesting architecture.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #940  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2013, 7:52 PM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,839
Quote:
Originally Posted by EastVanMark View Post
If recent history teaches us anything, if it is a shorter, smaller building it might have some interesting design features. If its anything taller, then it must be a plain rectangle with clear or green glass. If you're really living on the edge Vancouver style, it MIGHT even include...wait for it... a PROTRUDING BOX!
Hey!! Prodruding boxes are cool and beautiful. So is lower-cost green glass. So are truncated buildings. Lighten up! These are becoming the Hallmarks of Vancouver Design.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:31 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.