Disagree strongly, and this reeks of Robert Moses urban renewal. Washington DC is infamous for its strong preservationist lobby, and it's the American city with by far the most buildings listed as "historic"
Everything in orange below is protected:
And it looks like another one is coming in the next month:
https://dc.urbanturf.com/articles/bl...district/18645
----------------
And yet....Washington is booming, and has grown by 15% in the past decade.
Even being only 61 square miles, D.C. has enough empty space to keep growing for the next 50 years. Navy Yard alone was a nothing more than a decade ago and now has 15,000 people, and still has space to add another 10,000. And this is just a tiny neighborhood:
https://www.google.com/maps/place/Na...xgQ8gF6BAhgEAE
Ward 6 in D.C. is 5.7 square miles, yet added 30,000 people from 2010-2020. Density went from 12,000 per mile in 2010 to 17,500:
https://censusreporter.org/profiles/...006-ward-6-dc/
This is the now-defunct Kennedy Stadium:
It's right next to desirable Capitol Hill, the U.S. Capitol, and Union Station. This stadium and the parking lots alone could accommodate upwards of 25,000 people.
Could you imagine New York if they'd decided to raze Park Slope, instead of redeveloping the Brooklyn Navy Yard? You're not going to fix the housing crisis by razing historic buildings.