Quote:
Originally Posted by xanaxanax
I thought there's been a lot of discussion with private developers and Wayne Mason about the Dennis Building and the lot beside it recently about developing that lot and preserving the Dennis building
|
A good development on this site would make a huge difference for the downtown.
I hope I'm wrong, but the lack of progress with this site and the complaining about paying $50k to heat the building, etc. gives me a pretty terrible feeling about the province's collective view of the situation. They're still operating a parking lot across the street on some of the most valuable and culturally significant land in the province.
In the past another comment has been that the province can't compete with private landlords, so if an office building does go in on Barrington Street in 2030 then the street will at best get an Access NS if it is lucky. One block over, this has already happened in the former Eaton's building, which arguably has the nicest retail storefront space on the street.
My fear is that they are accounting for easy-to-calculate dollar costs while ignoring much larger opportunity costs. There's a cost to keeping prime land empty. You see less development and therefore lower tax revenues. The empty lots drive down the desirability of the area, hurting nearby businesses and tourism. The empty lots also give residents and visitors alike a negative impression of the city and the province -- an empty building and a parking lot in the middle of the city makes a poor impression, and the province's economic reputation, whether it's justified or not, is already pretty much on life support. Empty storefronts also kill retail areas, even if they are used as office space.