HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southwest


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #12001  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2018, 2:37 AM
stutteringpunk stutteringpunk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 127
Quote:
Originally Posted by ASUSunDevil View Post
Looks cool to me.
Agreed. Any height is an improvement in my opinion. It also ain't the Sheraton either.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12002  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2018, 3:45 AM
Obadno Obadno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,608
Yeah looks like they are leaving the van buren side of the base open for a second tower

It removes the setback issue of the old proposal and looks to be what ~22stories and super wide?

I think it’s fine. It’s not like downtown is hurting for space and stocky wife buildings can end up being very cool/differentiation in the skyline hardly worth scoffing at

Edit: the only thing I dont like is there far to long timeline.

Last edited by Obadno; Mar 8, 2018 at 4:04 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12003  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2018, 5:01 PM
muertecaza muertecaza is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,231
Quote:
Originally Posted by combusean View Post
We have something approaching a rendering for 200 W Monroe courtesy of DVC.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SuQ...rIOpK_SXx/view

I'm not impressed. It's what happens when developers have too large a lot. It's also a slap in the face compared to the developer's other projects in other cities which are larger and more architecturally interesting.
Yeah, not a big fan. I do prefer this to the previous office proposal. But generally not really in favor of full-block parking podiums. With 40,000 ft. of proposed commercial space, they could at least hopefully do that part of it right--I'm hopeful for instance for the street presence of Block 23 and Union in Tempe that have similar full-block footprints.

If it ended up like a scaled-down version of their Ft. Lauderdale project, that would be pretty cool.

EDIT: Also, not sure if Golub went through abandoning the alley, and it's hard to tell from the rendering whether there is still an alley beneath the building. If neither is true, they are setting themselves up for a battle with Urban Phoenix Project and Downtown Voices Coalition folks. And I could see the City not wanting to abandon this alley after abandoning the Barrister alley.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12004  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2018, 6:09 PM
CrestedSaguaro's Avatar
CrestedSaguaro CrestedSaguaro is offline
Modulator
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 4,398
Quote:
Originally Posted by muertecaza View Post
If it ended up like a scaled-down version of their Ft. Lauderdale project, that would be pretty cool.

EDIT: Also, not sure if Golub went through abandoning the alley, and it's hard to tell from the rendering whether there is still an alley beneath the building. If neither is true, they are setting themselves up for a battle with Urban Phoenix Project and Downtown Voices Coalition folks. And I could see the City not wanting to abandon this alley after abandoning the Barrister alley.
It does look like it's a scaled down version of the Ft. Lauderdale tower. This is just a preliminary sketch and I'm sure a more detailed rendering will be much better looking.

I do see a fight brewing for the alley right-of-way considering how much of a fuss went into the Barrister abandonment. I am honestly against abandoning the alley myself. We need to decrease the number of super-sized blocks, not increase them.
__________________
Ronnie Garrett
https://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?memberID=205
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12005  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2018, 6:13 PM
Obadno Obadno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,608
Quote:
Originally Posted by RonnieFoos View Post
It does look like it's a scaled down version of the Ft. Lauderdale tower. This is just a preliminary sketch and I'm sure a more detailed rendering will be much better looking.

I do see a fight brewing for the alley right-of-way considering how much of a fuss went into the Barrister abandonment. I am honestly against abandoning the alley myself. We need to decrease the number of super-sized blocks, not increase them.
I mean If they get the developer to redesign for the ally, they leave the Van Buren side empty for phase 2, even if we don't get phase 2 we get a better and bigger phase one.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12006  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2018, 7:19 PM
Phxguy Phxguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 1,134
On the fence about the design, looks like a larger/modern version of the Professional Building. Disappointing when the article leads with their other designs which look far nicer. That one from Miami would do wonders here on such a prominent and visible lot. And I understand this is maybe just a preliminary rendering, so maybe in the end we'll get a noteworthy project.


In other news, the shipping containers for the Churchill are being installed. I believe we have only been informed of 5/10 tenants for this project.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12007  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2018, 8:54 PM
biggus diggus biggus diggus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 2,838
here's to hoping they have a 20' fire breathing praying mantis like the container park in las vegas.
__________________
Mr. K the monopoly man
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12008  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2018, 9:23 PM
Obadno Obadno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,608
Quote:
Originally Posted by biggus diggus View Post
here's to hoping they have a 20' fire breathing praying mantis like the container park in las vegas.
Lol I agree the shipping container thing I hate, and it will age like 2 week old milk.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12009  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2018, 9:34 PM
biggus diggus biggus diggus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 2,838
In a year that location is going to be the alcohol center of the universe, worst case scenario is the shipping containers are all leased to bars.
__________________
Mr. K the monopoly man
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12010  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2018, 10:13 PM
haux's Avatar
haux haux is offline
Rising into view
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Downtown Phoenix
Posts: 143
They're putting in the containers at The Churchill. These are from just moments ago.



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12011  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2018, 10:40 PM
combusean's Avatar
combusean combusean is offline
Skyriser
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Newark, California
Posts: 7,201
I hate shipping container projects because of their third world aspect--we should be putting in buildings instead of upcycling industrial garbage in the downtown of such a large city.

But, like anything else, it's better than a vacant lot without the permanence of a "safe" building and not a huge investment that could be easily dismantled for future redevelopment.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12012  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2018, 10:42 PM
Obadno Obadno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,608
Quote:
Originally Posted by combusean View Post
I hate shipping container projects because of their third world aspect--we should be putting in buildings instead of upcycling industrial garbage in the downtown of such a large city.

But, like anything else, it's better than a vacant lot without the permanence of a "safe" building and not a huge investment that could be easily dismantled for future redevelopment.
Yeah, itll have a bar in it so there's that
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12013  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2018, 11:25 PM
muertecaza muertecaza is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,231
Quote:
Originally Posted by RonnieFoos View Post
So, I posted a while back about 200' building obstruction evaluation for the Kierland area. The obstruction was approved and now shows a little more detail. The permit shows "Proposed to build an approximate 200 foot tall mixed-use building of hotel, residential, office and commercial uses.".

I'm trying to find more information on the development. But it is not part of the Optima development.
Here is DMB's PUD packet with details about this development:

https://www.phoenix.gov/pddsite/Docu...Z/Z-14-18n.pdf

They take the interesting approach of proposing two alternatives: a 120' building that is more massive horizontally and therefore blocks more neighboring views (assumedly from Optima); or a 196' option that's obviously taller but more slender.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12014  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2018, 11:53 PM
dtnphx dtnphx is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,057
Quote:
Originally Posted by muertecaza View Post
Here is DMB's PUD packet with details about this development:

https://www.phoenix.gov/pddsite/Docu...Z/Z-14-18n.pdf

They take the interesting approach of proposing two alternatives: a 120' building that is more massive horizontally and therefore blocks more neighboring views (assumedly from Optima); or a 196' option that's obviously taller but more slender.
Those zoom out balconies are so cool. Adds so much pow! and zing! I like.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12015  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2018, 4:09 PM
Classical in Phoenix's Avatar
Classical in Phoenix Classical in Phoenix is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: A place with bigger haboobs than yours
Posts: 625
Quote:
Originally Posted by Obadno View Post
Yeah, itll have a bar in it so there's that
Awesome.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12016  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2018, 5:01 PM
gymratmanaz gymratmanaz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,914
While a little color variance would be nice. I kinda like the design and the slanted, triangular balcony or glassed in parts.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12017  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2018, 5:07 PM
biggus diggus biggus diggus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 2,838
That area is beginning to get a little kooky, there's a fairly large shopping/living development well under construction on the north side of Scottsdale Quarter as well.
__________________
Mr. K the monopoly man
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12018  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2018, 8:01 PM
ASUSunDevil ASUSunDevil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 922
Quote:
Originally Posted by muertecaza View Post
Here is DMB's PUD packet with details about this development:

https://www.phoenix.gov/pddsite/Docu...Z/Z-14-18n.pdf

They take the interesting approach of proposing two alternatives: a 120' building that is more massive horizontally and therefore blocks more neighboring views (assumedly from Optima); or a 196' option that's obviously taller but more slender.
Those look incredible!

Davis might be the most important architect in PHX. They're definitely helping PHX/Tempe take large buildings to a much higher level. I'd say they deserve to build our new tallest (Central Station)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12019  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2018, 8:04 PM
ASUSunDevil ASUSunDevil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 922
Quote:
Originally Posted by combusean View Post
I hate shipping container projects because of their third world aspect--we should be putting in buildings instead of upcycling industrial garbage in the downtown of such a large city.

But, like anything else, it's better than a vacant lot without the permanence of a "safe" building and not a huge investment that could be easily dismantled for future redevelopment.
Disagree with the first part. See: Austin, TX

We have plenty of other vacant lots. This will help the cool factor + get more people wanting to live Downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12020  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2018, 9:59 PM
combusean's Avatar
combusean combusean is offline
Skyriser
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Newark, California
Posts: 7,201
So that 3 story Paragon at Kierland complex was built in 2000, bought for $210,000 a unit a few years ago ... and they're proposing to raze it for a 120' complex?

That's crazy. I've never heard of a newer property lasting so short.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southwest
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:01 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.