HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #201  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2006, 1:32 PM
Alargule Alargule is offline
Retarded User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Amsterdam, "in ze nezzerlens"
Posts: 89
In Amsterdam: definitely the 'Maupoleum', built in the 1970's and torn down less than 10 years after its completion. A huge, concrete 'commie-block' if you will, built in the heart of the historic center:

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #202  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2006, 2:18 PM
rockyi's Avatar
rockyi rockyi is offline
Bah!
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Rock Island, Illinois
Posts: 16,399
^Wow! What was that ugly hulk used for?
__________________
My feet hurt!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #203  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2006, 3:21 PM
Alargule Alargule is offline
Retarded User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Amsterdam, "in ze nezzerlens"
Posts: 89
Apartments and office space, mainly.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #204  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2006, 2:44 AM
toddguy toddguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Columbus Ohio
Posts: 873
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmancuso
^ ooh, that's pretty bad. gives that building in toronto a run for its money. kinda like a shorter version of this masterpiece:

soon to be joined in ugliness matrimony with:




Which is the front runner soon-to-be building that will snatch the ugly crown tiara away from that ugly old soviet monstrosity in Kaliningrad.

(just my opinion of course!)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #205  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2006, 10:41 PM
secondson secondson is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 83
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alargule
In Amsterdam: definitely the 'Maupoleum', built in the 1970's and torn down less than 10 years after its completion. A huge, concrete 'commie-block' if you will, built in the heart of the historic center:

Out of idle curiosity, aside from the fact that it was ugly, why did they tear it down?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #206  
Old Posted Nov 25, 2006, 1:13 AM
Marcu Marcu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,649
Quote:
Originally Posted by toddguy
soon to be joined in ugliness matrimony with:




Which is the front runner soon-to-be building that will snatch the ugly crown tiara away from that ugly old soviet monstrosity in Kaliningrad.

(just my opinion of course!)
Whose idiotic idea was it to build this thing again and why are they building it?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #207  
Old Posted Nov 25, 2006, 4:35 AM
SapphireBlueEyes SapphireBlueEyes is offline
Honored Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago-John Hancock Center
Posts: 206
Smile

Building near Paddington Station...Makes Mies Van Der Rohe buildings look like 'Wonders of the World!' [and that's not saying much, as you can tell, I'm NOT a Bloody 'Mies' fan!]

-Sapphire Blue Eyes-
Citizens for Better Planning of CHICAGO
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #208  
Old Posted Nov 25, 2006, 7:37 AM
clubbster clubbster is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Singapore
Posts: 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by sapphireblueeyes
Building near Paddington Station...Makes Mies Van Der Rohe buildings look like 'Wonders of the World!' [and that's not saying much, as you can tell, I'm NOT a Bloody 'Mies' fan!]
That's the Trellick Tower -- that and its sister (the Balfron Tower in E London) are the best examples of Brutalist residential high-rises in London.

It was built as council housing, but most of the apartments are now privately owned, and highly sought-after. It's also the de-facto icon of Notting Hill (the area of London it's in), and now very much loved by the locals, and probably one of the most popular examples of modern architecture in the UK. Most of Erno Goldfinger's buildings received a rough reception when built, but they're actually pretty well-designed and beautifully detailed, and a couple of decades and improved maintenance have turned public opinion around.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #209  
Old Posted Nov 25, 2006, 4:41 PM
PhillyRising's Avatar
PhillyRising PhillyRising is offline
America's Hometown
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Lionville, PA
Posts: 11,778
Quote:
Originally Posted by bryson662001
Here's a contender......it's the federal courthouse in Philly. A few years ago the bricks were falling off so the GSA spent gazillions to strip the entire facade and put up new bricks....one by one....exactly the way they were before. That is also when they added the limestone trim (someone thought it might help but it only made things worse). That thing in the front that looks like a brick beach house (2nd picture) is the new visitor's center for the Independence National Park. It's pretty ugly too. Talk about fashion victims.





Yes...that is probably the most hideous building in Philadelphia with the State Building at Broad and Spring Garden as the runner up.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #210  
Old Posted Nov 25, 2006, 8:50 PM
Distill3d's Avatar
Distill3d Distill3d is offline
Glorfied Overrated Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver (Burnaby), British Columbia
Posts: 4,151
Quote:
Originally Posted by sapphireblueeyes
Building near Paddington Station...Makes Mies Van Der Rohe buildings look like 'Wonders of the World!' [and that's not saying much, as you can tell, I'm NOT a Bloody 'Mies' fan!]

-Sapphire Blue Eyes-
Citizens for Better Planning of CHICAGO

did they forget to finish this building? i mean seriously, that looks like the developer ran out of money and said "okay, we're done. don't worry about an outer core! it's not like it'll end up on the 'most shameful monstrosity list'!"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #211  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2006, 6:07 AM
Exodus Exodus is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,859
Quote:
Originally Posted by boden
I don't live in NY, but here is a building in the Bronx

WTF? Are those cooling towers ? That's got to be part of a plant or something, right ?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #212  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2006, 7:28 AM
TheMeltyMan's Avatar
TheMeltyMan TheMeltyMan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,217
It looks like an oversized air-conditioner. What a work of art.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #213  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2006, 8:21 AM
Stephenapolis's Avatar
Stephenapolis Stephenapolis is offline
The True Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 8,573
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exodus
WTF? Are those cooling towers ? That's got to be part of a plant or something, right ?
It could be. We have something like this in dt Minneapolis. It is a steam plant that provides heat to most if not all of the buildings in dt Minneapolis. In January this thing covers a good part of dt in a shroud of water vapor.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #214  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2006, 1:02 PM
gradvmedusa gradvmedusa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 15
Love it or hate it? Hard to tell from the photo but in person this thing looks HUGE.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #215  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2006, 3:16 PM
rockyi's Avatar
rockyi rockyi is offline
Bah!
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Rock Island, Illinois
Posts: 16,399


Quote:
WTF? Are those cooling towers?
It looks like a row of Reeses Peanut Butter Cups on the roof.
__________________
My feet hurt!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #216  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2006, 3:33 PM
CGII's Avatar
CGII CGII is offline
illwaukee/crooklyn
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: rome
Posts: 8,518
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephenapolis
It could be. We have something like this in dt Minneapolis. It is a steam plant that provides heat to most if not all of the buildings in dt Minneapolis. In January this thing covers a good part of dt in a shroud of water vapor.
There's one just South of 311 Wacker in Chicago, but, granted, the design is a lot nicer.

How could I forget Kaden?

It still astounds me that the same man that brought us Kaden gave us the Robie House, the Kaufmann House, Price Tower, the Guggenheim...
__________________
disregard women. acquire finances.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #217  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2006, 9:06 PM
The_Analyst's Avatar
The_Analyst The_Analyst is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 122
From the Hotel Uzbekistan brochure: "Walk into our luxurious rooms with olive green shag carpet, bright yellow daisy-print bedspreads, and matching faux dark walnut formica end tables. Enjoy the 19 inch color TV featuring all 2 of Uzbekistan's channels. Your ensuite stepsaver bath features refreshing cold running water and electric light with switch. Awarded the Soviet 4 red star rating in 1967, we haven't changed a thing since then."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #218  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2006, 10:14 PM
TheMeltyMan's Avatar
TheMeltyMan TheMeltyMan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,217
NEW YORK - Westin Hotel



Gotham has no room for clown buildings.

Tacoma, Washington - What the hell building




Mystery Asian building



Behind Scottish Parliament

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #219  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2006, 10:31 PM
spyguy's Avatar
spyguy spyguy is offline
THAT Guy
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,949
Many probably hate Granville Tower in Chicago, however, I actually kind of like it.


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #220  
Old Posted Nov 27, 2006, 12:57 AM
LMich's Avatar
LMich LMich is offline
Midwest Moderator - Editor
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Big Mitten
Posts: 31,745
I must say, for me, anyway, there is a clear difference between an ugly, uninteresting building, and then one that happens to be 'ugly,' but interesting. Most that have been posted are the latter.

What I consider 'ugly' is simply a design that the architect has put little thought in effort to, and that can include both conventionally "ugly" and "beautiful" buildings new and old, alike.

For instance, there is no way I'd consider the Kaden Tower "ugly." There was just too much thought and intricate detail put into that design for it to be ugly. It's certainly unconventional, but that's not the definition of ugly in my book. Now, take your typical senior citizens tower built with subsidies from the government, or a tower built by a developer on a tight and low budget building a building too large or two high thus cutting out the detail and I'll show you an ugly building.
__________________
Where the trees are the right height
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:26 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.