HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture


    The Brooklyn Tower in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • New York Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
New York Projects & Construction Forum

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1541  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2021, 2:20 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Riverview Estates Fairway (PA)
Posts: 45,815
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1542  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2021, 3:27 PM
BuildThemTaller BuildThemTaller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Long Island City, NY
Posts: 1,016
For a skyline that has been built mostly over the last decade+, Brooklyn is remarkably devoid of blue glass boxes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1543  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2021, 3:38 PM
QUEENSNYMAN QUEENSNYMAN is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Queens, New York
Posts: 1,270
chris08876, those pics were great! Brooklyn will have the King of Kings County!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1544  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2021, 5:06 PM
Imaus's Avatar
Imaus Imaus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 11
A true beauty, love seeing it and how it compliments the skyline.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1545  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2021, 5:16 PM
BK1985 BK1985 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 248
Quote:
Originally Posted by BuildThemTaller View Post
For a skyline that has been built mostly over the last decade+, Brooklyn is remarkably devoid of blue glass boxes.
Lol good. Let’s keep it that way.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1546  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2021, 8:41 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,899
Brooklyn has seen mostly residential towers, and those tend to stay away from the blue glass, which itself is mostly centered on Manhattan’s west side.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1547  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2021, 8:48 PM
BuildThemTaller BuildThemTaller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Long Island City, NY
Posts: 1,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYguy View Post
Brooklyn has seen mostly residential towers, and those tend to stay away from the blue glass, which itself is mostly centered on Manhattan’s west side.
Maybe, but there are a lot of blue glass residential towers in NYC and around the country. Long Island City, near Court Square, has a bunch. The Williamsburg waterfront, the Two Bridges towers, Central Park Tower, etc. A lot of the recent residential towers in Philly, Miami, and Austin are blue glass.

It's nice to have a place where that isn't the dominant trend.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1548  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2021, 10:36 PM
Barney Greengrass's Avatar
Barney Greengrass Barney Greengrass is offline
West End & Riverside
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: UWS NYC, Dörfli Zürich
Posts: 508
Quote:
Originally Posted by BuildThemTaller View Post
Maybe, but there are a lot of blue glass residential towers in NYC and around the country. Long Island City, near Court Square, has a bunch. The Williamsburg waterfront, the Two Bridges towers, Central Park Tower, etc. A lot of the recent residential towers in Philly, Miami, and Austin are blue glass.

It's nice to have a place where that isn't the dominant trend.
In Vancouver and Toronto it became a running joke, though it seems to have subsided now. Downtown Brooklyn avoided the trend but you're right, there are plenty of others scattered around here and LIC definitely has its share.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1549  
Old Posted Sep 21, 2021, 12:36 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,899
Quote:
Originally Posted by BuildThemTaller View Post
Maybe, but there are a lot of blue glass residential towers in NYC and around the country. Long Island City, near Court Square, has a bunch.
There really aren't a lot going up in midtown besides the west side, where they're built in clusters. LIC isn't characterized by blue glass buildings either, that's not what's been going up there for the most part. And of course, here in Brooklyn you don't see a lot of it. A lot of the buildings are bland (both in Brooklyn and LIC), but you can't just pin that on blue glass.




https://www.instagram.com/p/CUDqqHfpnPB/





https://www.instagram.com/p/CT_G831rWt1/





__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1550  
Old Posted Sep 21, 2021, 8:22 PM
QUEENSNYMAN QUEENSNYMAN is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Queens, New York
Posts: 1,270
My latest video from last night, by NYCSKYSCRAPERS2020:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbBSWRaMDwQ
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1551  
Old Posted Sep 22, 2021, 1:35 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,899
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1552  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2021, 12:31 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,899
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1553  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2021, 3:41 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,899
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1554  
Old Posted Sep 24, 2021, 2:50 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,899
The amended zoning diagram changes the height....















Another look at that sunrise shoot....



https://twitter.com/GaryHershorn/sta...697858/photo/3





__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.

Last edited by NYguy; Sep 24, 2021 at 3:08 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1555  
Old Posted Sep 24, 2021, 9:24 PM
QUEENSNYMAN QUEENSNYMAN is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Queens, New York
Posts: 1,270
9 Dekalb is in my latest video from Brooklyn, By NYCSKYSCRAERS2020:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KECd2BC0hpY
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1556  
Old Posted Sep 24, 2021, 11:37 PM
Crawford Crawford is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 30,757
So this is officially 1,073 ft.

Was that an increase from 1,066 or a decrease from 1,099? I see both figures in official documents.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1557  
Old Posted Sep 25, 2021, 12:05 AM
ht-freak ht-freak is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 106
I've been noticing dicrepancies in heights whether in "official" or actual heights. Too bad there isn't a group that can verify street to highest part of the structure(not including antenna) by drone.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1558  
Old Posted Sep 25, 2021, 1:31 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,899
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crawford View Post
So this is officially 1,073 ft.

Was that an increase from 1,066 or a decrease from 1,099? I see both figures in official documents.
The height of 1,066 has been changed for a long time.




Quote:
Originally Posted by ht-freak View Post
I've been noticing dicrepancies in heights whether in "official" or actual heights. Too bad there isn't a group that can verify street to highest part of the structure(not including antenna) by drone.
There have been no discrepancies. The DOB documents are official. Buildings do sometimes undergo changes, and that's what's reflected. Also, keep in mind that when someone quotes a height, it may be an actual "roof" height, omitting rooftop structures or parapet heights.



1066 ft



1099 ft




This is the last amendment. As the building is close to being topped out, I would assume there would be no more changes.


1073 ft





NYMAN2010











https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/n...?adppopup=true







Not hard to find....


https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/n...?adppopup=true

__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.

Last edited by NYguy; Sep 25, 2021 at 2:16 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1559  
Old Posted Sep 25, 2021, 5:51 AM
ht-freak ht-freak is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 106
NYguy That is incorrect. If you compare different websites, you will see different heights for the same building. I lived in Brooklyn for 9 years leaving in the 70's. I could see the existing tallest buildings. For years, many sources had the Montague-Court building listed as 399', which I knew had to be incorrect. I finally found the correct height (462') in Skyscraper center(Council on tall buildings and urban habitat) and emailed this site to correct in the diagrams, which they did as did other sources. I've been trying to get this site to do the same for 75 Livingston St. listed as 343', should be 399' as stated in aforementioned website. The list goes on and on. Check it out yourself. Look at Ava Dobro, 540 Fulton(to name a couple)Look up their respective heights on this site, Skyscraper City, wikipedia and others to see what I mean.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1560  
Old Posted Sep 25, 2021, 10:51 AM
QUEENSNYMAN QUEENSNYMAN is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Queens, New York
Posts: 1,270
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:01 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.