HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #48421  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2021, 2:11 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,368
Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post
It's good to see these fill up. I posted a few weeks ago about Roosevelt Square phase 3 from Related Midwest. Was kind of surprised to see nobody talk about it. On the other side of Addams Medill Park on Roosevelt, 2 new buildings on vacant lots - 6 stories and 70 units each. Pretty close to the IMD in general.
I was at the community meeting for the Roosevelt Sq project since I live nearby, it also includes the buildout of the Public Housing Museum on Taylor and a mixed-use building at Taylor/Racine.

Exciting, but the overall progress on Roosevelt Square and the other CHA lands (Cabrini, Robert Taylor, Prairie Shores) has been embarrassing.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #48422  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2021, 2:27 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
I was at the community meeting for the Roosevelt Sq project since I live nearby, it also includes the buildout of the Public Housing Museum on Taylor and a mixed-use building at Taylor/Racine.

Exciting, but the overall progress on Roosevelt Square and the other CHA lands (Cabrini, Robert Taylor, Prairie Shores) has been embarrassing.
Yup. Posted all that a few weeks back. I read some people were worried about their property values..?

Yeah, it has been slow. I think they said they wanted to complete phase 3 in 2023 right? When is this supposed to start then?
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #48423  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2021, 2:34 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,368
Yeah Little Italy residents are really awful. God forbid they have to share the neighborhood with some lower-income families. I can't believe they'd rather have a vacant lot. Fortunately Ald. Ervin doesn't really give a crap about their NIMBY complaints. He might be sensitive to parking complaints but I doubt he will downsize the buildings. Can't believe I'm saying this but thank god for our gerrymandered ward map. If there was a white alderman representing the Near West Side it would be a NIMBY paradise like Norwood Park or something.

Any phasing for Roosevelt Square is basically a joke. Related keeps tweaking the income mix but per their agreement with CHA, they can't build enough market-rate units to actually be profitable. So they have to rely on a trickle of LIHTC tax credits to build everything, and those credits are highly competitive every year.

What I don't get is why Related claims they can't make market-rate townhouses pencil out in Little Italy, when the market for SFH and townhomes is the hottest we've seen in decades (condos not so much). Seems like you could literally print money with those.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #48424  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2021, 2:35 PM
ChiPlanner ChiPlanner is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Lakeview East Chicago
Posts: 173
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
I was at the community meeting for the Roosevelt Sq project since I live nearby, it also includes the buildout of the Public Housing Museum on Taylor and a mixed-use building at Taylor/Racine.

Exciting, but the overall progress on Roosevelt Square and the other CHA lands (Cabrini, Robert Taylor, Prairie Shores) has been embarrassing.
Honestly though, the build-out proposed for the Roosevelt Square area is FAR superior to what they were doing pre-recession. Those single family homes and two flats already look horribly aged and are strikingly low density.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #48425  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2021, 2:50 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,368
I would have liked to see denser development in Roosevelt Square Phase I, given how close it is to downtown, but I don't mind the fine-grained scale of the early 2000s stuff. The design is a little cringey but it hits all the right points of a traditional Chicago neighborhood block (porches/stoops, parking off alleys, fenced yards, narrow lots, etc).

It could have been so much worse; HOPE VI developments in other cities are really really bad imitations of neighborhood vernacular. Roosevelt Square is merely mediocre. The buildings are all masonry too so I think they've aged pretty well, they just need a spitshine after almost 20 years of Chicago winters.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #48426  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2021, 3:02 PM
Randomguy34's Avatar
Randomguy34 Randomguy34 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago & Philly
Posts: 2,369
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
I was at the community meeting for the Roosevelt Sq project since I live nearby, it also includes the buildout of the Public Housing Museum on Taylor and a mixed-use building at Taylor/Racine.

Exciting, but the overall progress on Roosevelt Square and the other CHA lands (Cabrini, Robert Taylor, Prairie Shores) has been embarrassing.
Hearing NIMBYs complain at CHA meetings is probably one of the most toxic cesspools you could imagine at a meeting

To answer your question about why progress on developing the sites has been slow, CHA the past couple of years has been shifting towards having the private sector play a major role in redeveloping the sites. CHA could get more public funds to redevelop the sites themselves, but the CHA doesn't want to take that risk after what happened with the Great Recession.

That's why Related has been heavily involved with Lathrop Homes & Roosevelt Square, Harold Ickes is being built by Mccaffrey, and the current Cabrini Green phase being developed by a Texas developer. So redeveloping the remaining CHA sites isn't going to happen anytime soon unless there is interest from the private sector. This of course means that the former Robert Taylor and Ida B. Wells homes are gonna remain vacant for a long while
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #48427  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2021, 10:51 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by bcp View Post
Sorry...wait, what??

"Public housing museum"...

What the hell...?
It actually exists in River North. It would move to Taylor St once that's completed:

https://www.nphm.org
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #48428  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2021, 2:56 AM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,368
Quote:
Originally Posted by bcp View Post
Sorry...wait, what??

"Public housing museum"...

What the hell...?
If this seems like a weird idea to you, watch The Pruitt Igoe Myth. There's a lot of interesting history - the people who moved in didn't do so out of desperation, the projects were genuinely an upgrade from the overcrowded slums, at least at first. Then the wheels started coming off, for a whole list of complicated reasons.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #48429  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2021, 3:23 PM
killaviews's Avatar
killaviews killaviews is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 492
Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post
Permit was issued yesterday to renovate the Bridgeview Bank building in Uptown on Broadway (& Lawrence) with Cedar St leading the charge. Part of it will be converted to 176 new apartments, and the lobby will become a co-working space. The rooftop will have an amenity deck. Ground floor Starbucks and bank are expected to remain. According to an article from November, they'd most likely start once they have permits - which is now..

Estimated cost on the permit is nearly $15.25M. Cedar St bought the building a few years ago for $19M.
Level Incorporated - the architect - posted updates on Instagram. Glad to see this is well on its way.
https://www.instagram.com/p/CNpkmKoh...d=zs6i1kz5l3cw
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #48430  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2021, 3:59 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,368
Quote:
Originally Posted by bcp View Post
I'm familiar - good intentions gone awry due to very bad design (and many other factors).

That said - seems like a waste of funds that could be used for............housing?
The museum has done private fundraising like any other museum and gotten state/federal cultural grants. I think Related is making a big donation that will put them over the top. They're not using housing funds for the museum.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #48431  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2021, 4:41 PM
west-town-brad west-town-brad is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 967
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
If this seems like a weird idea to you, watch The Pruitt Igoe Myth. There's a lot of interesting history - the people who moved in didn't do so out of desperation, the projects were genuinely an upgrade from the overcrowded slums, at least at first. Then the wheels started coming off, for a whole list of complicated reasons.
no weirder of an idea for a museum than:

https://www.atlasobscura.com/places/...holography-mro

or

https://imss.org/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #48432  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2021, 8:20 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
Show me the blueprints
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 10,356
My parents bought me a Michael Jackson hologram sticker from the Museum of Holography when I was a little boy back in the day. Good memories.
__________________
Everything new is old again

There is no goodness in him, and his power to convince people otherwise is beyond understanding
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #48433  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2021, 9:26 PM
CrazyCres's Avatar
CrazyCres CrazyCres is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Behind You
Posts: 345
C40 Chicago Loop Site Proposals

Assemble Chicago
Video Link


Common Good Collaborative - The Arbor
Video Link


Inspiration Exchange
Video Link


ecoVIBE -
Video Link


Assemble Chicago is my favorite
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #48434  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2021, 10:25 PM
r18tdi's Avatar
r18tdi r18tdi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,432
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrazyCres View Post

Assemble Chicago is my favorite
I second this. It's not even close (aesthetically speaking).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #48435  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2021, 10:53 PM
CrazyCres's Avatar
CrazyCres CrazyCres is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Behind You
Posts: 345
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #48436  
Old Posted Apr 16, 2021, 4:11 AM
ithakas's Avatar
ithakas ithakas is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 977
Quote:
Originally Posted by r18tdi View Post
I second this. It's not even close (aesthetically speaking).
Agreed, though I like programming aspects of all the other projects a lot (a Silver Room space, Massimo Bottura soup kitchen, and housing for recently graduated artists, respectively).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #48437  
Old Posted Apr 16, 2021, 3:00 PM
Jibba's Avatar
Jibba Jibba is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,916
Quote:
Originally Posted by ithakas View Post
Agreed, though I like programming aspects of all the other projects a lot (a Silver Room space, Massimo Bottura soup kitchen, and housing for recently graduated artists, respectively).
Agree. And the way the Valerio building meets the park is quite nice.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #48438  
Old Posted Apr 16, 2021, 5:33 PM
BrinChi BrinChi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 446
Honestly they all seem like great proposals. Hopefully the park itself can be successful and inviting for everyone.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #48439  
Old Posted Apr 17, 2021, 7:35 PM
harryc's Avatar
harryc harryc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Park, Il
Posts: 14,989
932 W Randolph

April 11






__________________
Harry C - Urbanize Chicago- My Flickr stream HRC_OakPark
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. B Franklin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #48440  
Old Posted Apr 17, 2021, 7:48 PM
harryc's Avatar
harryc harryc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Park, Il
Posts: 14,989
1117 W Randolph

March 29



April 11

__________________
Harry C - Urbanize Chicago- My Flickr stream HRC_OakPark
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. B Franklin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:00 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.