HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > Halifax > Suburbs


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2014, 5:50 PM
Dmajackson's Avatar
Dmajackson Dmajackson is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: B3K Halifax, NS
Posts: 9,342
[Halifax] Regency Park Extension | 12 Buildings | 7-28 FL | Proposed

New proposal for the Mount Royale area for a Stage I development agreement to allow the extension of Regency Park Drive to Washmill Lake Drive adjacent Bentley Drive. The plan is for 996 residential units in a mix of townhouses and mult-unit dwellings up to 12 floors and 164'000sq ft of commercial and office space.

Case 19532 Details
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2014, 11:05 AM
curnhalio's Avatar
curnhalio curnhalio is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 314
It's what we've been asking for, isn't it? All the buildings appear to be at the street with parking in the rear. It does look like the on-street diagonal parking is facing the wrong way. Or, are people going to be required to back into these spaces?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Jul 13, 2023, 12:48 AM
Dmajackson's Avatar
Dmajackson Dmajackson is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: B3K Halifax, NS
Posts: 9,342
Might as well reuse this long-dead thread for the new proposal;

Rank Inc is proposing a Stage I DA for the extension of Regency Park Drive to Washmill Lake Drive.

• the extension of Regency Park Drive to Washmill Lake Drive;
• a total of 12 multiple unit buildings ranging in height from 7 to 28 storeys;
• ~2,750 residential units inclusive of townhouse style and apartment units;
• ~ 143,000 square feet of commercial space located along the Regency Park Drive extension;
• dedicated parkland and trail systems that connect the development to existing trails within the area, such as the Geizer Hill Trail;
• landscaped areas and amenity spaces throughout the development

Case 2023-00408 Details
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2023, 1:55 PM
Stuckinsky Stuckinsky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 18
Seems to be a lack of images here on the HRM forums. Going to start posting before these files get pulled off the city's website!




Last edited by Stuckinsky; Jul 14, 2023 at 2:07 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2023, 4:12 PM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 33,694
It seems a bit better than some projects around there but still not great. I don't think site plans like this, added together, add up to a larger area where you can easily get a lot of your day-to-day needs met without a car, ideally in an attractive environment (not walking or cycling through parking lots and arterial roads).

I am sure some people like this part of town but it is the worst of both worlds in some ways. You get multi-unit with no private outdoor space and shared walls but you don't get the usual convenience of a medium density neighbourhod.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2023, 4:19 PM
LikesBikes's Avatar
LikesBikes LikesBikes is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Halifax
Posts: 172
Terrible placement for the parking. Looks like a Le Corbusian nightmare.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2023, 4:49 PM
fatscat fatscat is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 162
Quote:
Originally Posted by someone123 View Post
It seems a bit better than some projects around there but still not great. I don't think site plans like this, added together, add up to a larger area where you can easily get a lot of your day-to-day needs met without a car, ideally in an attractive environment (not walking or cycling through parking lots and arterial roads).

I am sure some people like this part of town but it is the worst of both worlds in some ways. You get multi-unit with no private outdoor space and shared walls but you don't get the usual convenience of a medium density neighbourhod.
143,000 sq. feet of retail space ain't nothing, and perhaps there may be some additional retail developments on this stretch in the future.

That said, I generally agree with your sentiment. If I had to imagine myself living here, I'd feel land locked (based on the current proposal).

There is also way too much open-air parking creating a much more sparse neighbourhood. If that was placed underground, everything could be tighter and create a better sense of place
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2023, 6:18 PM
teddifax's Avatar
teddifax teddifax is offline
Halifax Promoter!
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Halifax
Posts: 1,080
\This looks great, I hope the buildings have some design, like shown here! I think the parking is mostly underground with parking shown to be guest or commercial.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > Halifax > Suburbs
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:00 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.