HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #781  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2024, 8:11 PM
BrickellBased BrickellBased is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 187
Interesting effects of city planning and zone on real estate economics. I am sure this case will be studied for a many years to come.

The Class A out-performance has been playing out in Chicago as well which hasn't suffered from the same zoning issues as NY I don't believe. Salesforce broke ground on a new tower there after the pandemic started. Several other major towers were completed around that time as well, 110 Wacker, BMO Tower - several other new office space in Fulton Market has kicked off since the pandemic too. And there is a big project to convert old vacant office space to residential now.

I think a lot of it is once a new standard is set, basically all of the previous stock becomes antiquated and you're almost starting from 0 again. If you're not in Hudson Yards or in a new building you're 2nd tier.

Also I think there's an element of induced demand - once people see the shiny new developments then what was Class A becomes Class B. Or maybe now there is a new class A+ or something.

Quote:
Originally Posted by NYguy View Post
^ Good look at the 3 designs.





The problem with New York is, even though there is a lot of office space, and a lot of office buildings, most of them - especially in Midtown East - are 80 years or older. New York hasn't really done a good job of renewing it's office supply, mainly due to zoning restrictions. Midtown East was zoned down, so most of the office buildings that could or would have been replaced would have had to be replaced with smaller buildings. Which was ridiculous. That all changed with the Midtown East rezoning. Meanwhile, the Hudson Yards was the city's effort to provide a space for the kinds of new office towers companies demand, it has proved more successful than really anyone thought.

Which brings us back to Midtown East. The largest, and really the only new significant office tower under construction is 270 Park Avenue, the headquarters of JPMC. It can't really be counted as an option, since it will entirely belong to JPMC.

Citadel, being the prime tenant at 350 Park, will get the best floors, and I'm sure some of the upper floors. The heavyweights like to be the anchor tenants in the new buildings. The smaller, upper floors of new buildings are some of the most expensive in the city. If you need a half million sf of space or more, you really want to be an anchor tenant in the early stages.

But when people wonder why new office towers are going up in the city, with a high vacancy rate, the issue is what's in demand. Not all office space is the same, and it's the newer office space that is in demand.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #782  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2024, 11:14 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,900
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrickellBased View Post
The Class A out-performance has been playing out in Chicago as well which hasn't suffered from the same zoning issues as NY I don't believe. Salesforce broke ground on a new tower there after the pandemic started. Several other major towers were completed around that time as well, 110 Wacker, BMO Tower - several other new office space in Fulton Market has kicked off since the pandemic too. And there is a big project to convert old vacant office space to residential now.

I think a lot of it is once a new standard is set, basically all of the previous stock becomes antiquated and you're almost starting from 0 again. If you're not in Hudson Yards or in a new building you're 2nd tier.

Also I think there's an element of induced demand - once people see the shiny new developments then what was Class A becomes Class B. Or maybe now there is a new class A+ or something.

One key is that they want to convert the older office buildings into residential. I've read where one landlord has been relocating companies into other buildings. As a developer, you know which towers can stand the test of the market, and which ones are better off as conversions. But another tier complicating matters is the fact that office buildings are well above the maximum FAR for residential in the state. They are trying to remedy that now, though with small gestures. But in the meantime, those older buildings are just driving up the vacancy rates. I saw a case, with SL Green I believe, where they are planning to hollow out and seal off a portion of a building to convert it to residential.

Park Avenue is ripe for redevelopment of some of the older structures.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:57 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.