HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #21  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2007, 9:48 PM
texcolo's Avatar
texcolo texcolo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Truth or Consequences, NM
Posts: 4,304
I'll second the opinion of the 'smallness' of AON Center.

I stood right across the street form it in Millium Park... it seemed 'small.'
__________________
"I am literally grasping at straws." - Bob Belcher
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2007, 12:04 AM
Austin55's Avatar
Austin55 Austin55 is offline
__________
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Fort Worth
Posts: 4,998
especially when compared to,or pictured from hancock and sears,
__________________
Fort Worth Urban Development
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2007, 12:23 AM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is offline
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 29,733
i'm sorry guys, but one of the most directly vertical box-scrapers ever built will never seem small or short to me. i guess we'll just have to agree to disagree.
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a great middle ground for many middle class families.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #24  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2007, 1:04 AM
CGII's Avatar
CGII CGII is offline
illwaukee/crooklyn
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: rome
Posts: 8,518
To give a sense of how unimaginably massive Wynn really is, it's the same height as Milwaukee's tallest, US Bank building.


from:http://www.city-data.com/picfilesv/picv22050.php
__________________
disregard women. acquire finances.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #25  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2007, 7:53 PM
Upward's Avatar
Upward Upward is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 8,047
That's crazy. And the Wynn is as wide as it is tall, right?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #26  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2007, 8:48 PM
Alpha Alpha is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,769

Stuttgart Planetary looks smaller than it is

The buildings of large thermal power stations look also often much smaller as they are. This comes from the fact, that these buildings are in most cases not surrounded by buildings with well-known height and are often seen from a large distance.

Generally tall structures not surrounded by others are always estamited lower. Take some pictures of radio masts and towers whose height you know and let someone estimate their height. The results are estonishing!

Tall pylons of powerline crossings of rivers and straits look often also not as tall as they are. This results in the circumstance that they are of same design as lower pylons, only just larger. How tall would you think is this pylon?



It is 346.5 metres tall ( taller than Eiffel Tower) and belongs to Yangtze River Powerline Crossing Jiangyin
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:37 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.