HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Downtown & City of Hamilton


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #41  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2022, 4:44 PM
ccheck7 ccheck7 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 34
This soil testing would be to inform the Geotechnical Report required for the 2nd submission. Unlike other municipalities, Hamilton doesn't require the full list of technical reports until the 2nd SPA submission. A Geotechnical report was not submitted with the initial application.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #42  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2022, 3:33 AM
TheRitsman TheRitsman is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,021
DRP Package is up. Some significant changes:

- 905 Residential units now
- 626 Parking Spaces
-

There have been a few design changes. And while I'd still be generally critical of a lot of the design, including the lack of more retail, and the general feeling of the attempt to integrate "brick" with the heritage elements, I do think this submission looks and feels significantly better.
My biggest criticism would be the massive number of driveways. There are 5, and two of which connect in the middle for no real reason with a Woonerf style drive. Two parking entrances both off George street which will be a clusterfuck for traffic, unsure why at least one entrance isn't off Main St.

I tried to post the pictures below in a clockwise fashion around the base of the building starting with the southeast corner at Main and Caroline. I will post some more tomorrow.





















__________________
Hamilton Downtown. Huge tabletop skyline fan. Typically viewing the city from the street, not a helicopter. Cycling, transit and active transportation advocate 🚲🚍🚋

Follow me on Twitter: https://x.com/ham_bicycleguy?t=T_fx3...SIZNGfD4A&s=09
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #43  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2022, 12:04 PM
onetimetoomany onetimetoomany is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 52
I would prefer if the cladding were all one colour.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #44  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2022, 12:54 PM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 11,565
The architecture itself is fine. I'm even indifferent on the mid block driveway, cognizant of the condition of Main Street and how the local road will create a calmer pedestrian environment for the block. Even if Main is eventually 2-wayed and cut to 4 lanes, it's always going to be the primary vehicular corridor through downtown and is never going to be *super* pedestrian friendly.

I agree that all the accesses off of George Street are too much though. There is no reason a single 3 tower development needs 5 curb cuts, usually by having multi-tower developments one of the bonuses is reducing the number of curb cuts. They try to make it look otherwise, but as planned right now George Street would end up being basically little more than a rear lane servicing this development. The parking ramps should be consolidated to just a single ramp access, which should easily be able to handle 600 car parking spaces, and if possible, both the parking ramp and loading dock should be shifted to be off of the local driveway.

The Hess St frontage is possibly the best part of the project, and looks intelligently handled. Not more needs to be done there, I think. Even the Main St frontage looks generally good, though I may be partial to giving more space for the sidewalk and providing more connections to the local driveway for pedestrians compared to the little fence they are planning right now.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #45  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2022, 1:05 PM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 11,565
also - screw the escarpment height limit. You can really see the tabletop effect it's creating here.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #46  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2022, 1:20 PM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is online now
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 19,878
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheRitsman View Post
With Hess Village being next door as a destination, you'd think there would be a hotel component. The front entrance looks like a hotel; the first six floors could be hotel space.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #47  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2022, 1:24 PM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 11,565
There is a new hotel going up at Queen and King and Vrancor is planning another one at King and Caroline.. no lack of hotel space in the area.

Bentall Kennedy, the developer here, is a large institutional investor. I don't think they view that as a key market for them.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #48  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2022, 8:41 PM
johnnyhamont's Avatar
johnnyhamont johnnyhamont is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 1,115
Hess is not the kind of destination that out-of-towners book hotels to visit.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Innsertnamehere View Post
There is a new hotel going up at Queen and King and Vrancor is planning another one at King and Caroline.
do we know that the King/Caroline plan is hotel, rather than residential?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #49  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2022, 9:10 PM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 11,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnyhamont View Post
Hess is not the kind of destination that out-of-towners book hotels to visit.



do we know that the King/Caroline plan is hotel, rather than residential?
not specifically, but it's the kind of place that if you are staying in Hamilton, it's good to be close to.

The King / Caroline hotel will be on the lower floors with condos above from what I remember.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #50  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2022, 10:26 PM
ScreamingViking's Avatar
ScreamingViking ScreamingViking is offline
Ham-burgher
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,515
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnyhamont View Post
Hess is not the kind of destination that out-of-towners book hotels to visit.
Truth is the whole city is not the kind of destination that most out-of-towners book hotels to visit, unless they have a reason (event, etc.).

We still need a lot more hotel space though.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #51  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2022, 3:55 PM
TheHonestMaple's Avatar
TheHonestMaple TheHonestMaple is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 1,717
Fingers crossed we see this break ground this summer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #52  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2022, 7:40 PM
TheRitsman TheRitsman is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,021
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheHonestMaple View Post
Fingers crossed we see this break ground this summer.
Not a chance. This is next year at earliest at the point it's at. Developments this large require significantly more planning and I suspect staff will recommend changes to the drive entrances too.
__________________
Hamilton Downtown. Huge tabletop skyline fan. Typically viewing the city from the street, not a helicopter. Cycling, transit and active transportation advocate 🚲🚍🚋

Follow me on Twitter: https://x.com/ham_bicycleguy?t=T_fx3...SIZNGfD4A&s=09
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #53  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2022, 7:58 PM
TheHonestMaple's Avatar
TheHonestMaple TheHonestMaple is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 1,717
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheRitsman View Post
Not a chance. This is next year at earliest at the point it's at. Developments this large require significantly more planning and I suspect staff will recommend changes to the drive entrances too.
We'll see. SPA was submitted a solid two years ago.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #54  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2022, 11:54 PM
ZTrade ZTrade is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 156
There should be an LRT stop at Bay st. The density between this project, vrancor's two towers, and McMaster tower, combined with FirstOntario center should provide merit for a stop being there. Most likely another tower going up next to A&W in the future too.

As of right now, all of those people have to walk to James st to head East and Queen st to head west. I understand they are pretty close, but this is the heart of the city. From a cost/benefit point of view, I see there being more of a benefit for a stop being at Bay versus a cost of the LRT ride being 1-2 minutes longer as a result of this stop.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #55  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2022, 12:16 AM
TheRitsman TheRitsman is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,021
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZTrade View Post
There should be an LRT stop at Bay st. The density between this project, vrancor's two towers, and McMaster tower, combined with FirstOntario center should provide merit for a stop being there. Most likely another tower going up next to A&W in the future too.

As of right now, all of those people have to walk to James st to head East and Queen st to head west. I understand they are pretty close, but this is the heart of the city. From a cost/benefit point of view, I see there being more of a benefit for a stop being at Bay versus a cost of the LRT ride being 1-2 minutes longer as a result of this stop.
I agree. When I first moved here I thought a Bay St stop wouldn't be warranted, but I do think so now. I suspect one will be retrofit in the future. I hope the city has made room for future stop addition. Especially with FOC it makes sense since I'm sure after it's fixed up more events will be there, but even now the King and Bay intersection is one of the busiest with pedestrian traffic.
__________________
Hamilton Downtown. Huge tabletop skyline fan. Typically viewing the city from the street, not a helicopter. Cycling, transit and active transportation advocate 🚲🚍🚋

Follow me on Twitter: https://x.com/ham_bicycleguy?t=T_fx3...SIZNGfD4A&s=09
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #56  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2022, 12:44 AM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 11,565
James is very close so it’s not super necessary, but it wouldn’t hurt either.

This project is closer to Queen station anyways.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #57  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2022, 1:31 AM
TheRitsman TheRitsman is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,021
Quote:
Originally Posted by Innsertnamehere View Post
James is very close so it’s not super necessary, but it wouldn’t hurt either.

This project is closer to Queen station anyways.
It's not too far, but it's a bit of a trek for rapid transit in Hamilton. The big reason it wasn't included was cost saving and time saving. Despite the fact that the goal wasn't to improve speed by that much, the trip taking longer than it currently takes off-peak would have looked bad.

Currently taking the 10 would be 33 minutes, during rush hour that likely goes to 40 minutes. I believe the LRT is touting 31 minutes end to end.
__________________
Hamilton Downtown. Huge tabletop skyline fan. Typically viewing the city from the street, not a helicopter. Cycling, transit and active transportation advocate 🚲🚍🚋

Follow me on Twitter: https://x.com/ham_bicycleguy?t=T_fx3...SIZNGfD4A&s=09
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #58  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2022, 4:59 PM
shoelessjoe shoelessjoe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 75
Regarding the apartment building on Caroline S that is on the same property as the Arrival Inn - back in the 90s when it was an EconoLodge I stayed there with some friends after doing some drinking downtown -- and at that time the hotel had been expanded into that former apartment building. At various points it's had different flags (it was later a Quality Inn) and has continued to seemingly slide into full-blown seediness.

As for the heritage registration, back when I was a kid and it was the Town Manor it had a very cool mid-century vibe including a distinctive 'screen' on the building facing Main Street -- all long since stripped away/covered over (I believe the patterned brickwork is still visible on the building on the corner of Main and Caroline S)...there may have been some potential at some point for a retro-vibe restoration but that ship has likely sailed...the types of development encroaching on the area will eventually make the property ripe for redevelopment.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #59  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2022, 7:43 PM
TheRitsman TheRitsman is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,021
I wonder if the developers here are debating a site plan change again since the weird layout was largely a result of Main St being one way. If the city is seriously considering a two way conversion of Main St, this site plan would be even worse and even less necessary.
__________________
Hamilton Downtown. Huge tabletop skyline fan. Typically viewing the city from the street, not a helicopter. Cycling, transit and active transportation advocate 🚲🚍🚋

Follow me on Twitter: https://x.com/ham_bicycleguy?t=T_fx3...SIZNGfD4A&s=09
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #60  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2022, 10:30 PM
TheHonestMaple's Avatar
TheHonestMaple TheHonestMaple is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 1,717
What about it was weird? Still makes a lot of sense even with a two way Main.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Downtown & City of Hamilton
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:34 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.