HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia


View Poll Results: Should we adopt this format?
Yes 19 30.16%
No, keep it the same 32 50.79%
Yes, but with modifications 3 4.76%
I like josh white 9 14.29%
Voters: 63. You may not vote on this poll

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2008, 6:51 PM
Wooster's Avatar
Wooster Wooster is offline
Round Head
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 12,688
New Alberta Forum Format (SSP Local Alberta) VOTE!!

I think we should consider a much simpler, less fragmented version of SSP local Alberta. 2 main sections. Development and City building as one. and General discussion as the other.

I think most agree we could leave Calgary and Edmonton together. Let's vote on this format, and forward it to administrators.


Development and City building
Sticky: Calgary Construction
Sticky: Edmonton Construction
Sticky: Calgary Public Transit
Sticky: Edmonton Public Transit
Sticky: Calgary Roads
Sticky: Edmonton Roads
Sticky: YYC
Sticky: YEC
Unsticky: Everything else like individual project polls etc

General Discussion
Sticky: Calgary food and coffee
Sticky: Edmonton food and coffee
Sticky: Alberta economy and politics
Sticky: Calgary Arts and Entertainment
Sticky: Edmonton Arts and Enternainment
Sticky: Edmonton Sucks
Sticky: Calgary Rules
Unsticky: Everything else
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2008, 6:55 PM
lubicon's Avatar
lubicon lubicon is offline
Suburban dweller
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Calgary - our road planners are as bad as yours Edmonton
Posts: 5,047
I've said it before and I will say it again. Keep things the way they are, I don't want this forum to become more fragmented and harder to navigate.
__________________
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe.

Albert Einstein
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2008, 7:01 PM
RWin's Avatar
RWin RWin is offline
of Canada
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Calgary AB
Posts: 2,851
I think you should try changing the name and then re-poll.
__________________
All right... all right... but apart from better sanitation and medicine and education and irrigation and public health and roads and a freshwater system and baths and public order... what have the Romans done for us? NOTHING!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2008, 7:07 PM
Boris2k7's Avatar
Boris2k7 Boris2k7 is offline
Majestic
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Calgary
Posts: 12,010
No offense Josh, but this is a big can of worms.

...

Now, my view is as follows:

1) While I am not opposed to a Local totally... since my biggest issue was that the Construction thread be maintained... I do think that if we are to do so, we need to try and keep divisions to an absolute minimum.

2) I think that there are other things we should be looking at before Local, those being:
  • aesthetic upgrades to make sticky's more distinct and give the Alberta subforum a better "sense of place" (including, if possible, better navigation and a banner)
  • more local moderation; right now, we have itom, who does a good enough job I guess, but we could use increased supervision and intervention from above (obviously, I cannot fulfill this role if available because I have little ability to remain a third party in most debates)
  • a firmer set of rules for the Alberta subforum regarding voluntary posting practice, common courtesy, and forum direction
  • more coordination regarding items such as diagram requests and news posting

etc.
__________________
"The only thing that gets me through our winters is the knowledge that they're the only thing keeping us free of giant ass spiders." -MonkeyRonin

Flickr

Last edited by Boris2k7; Mar 4, 2008 at 7:18 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2008, 9:17 PM
Kevin_foster's Avatar
Kevin_foster Kevin_foster is offline
Kevin Folds Five
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Posts: 6,064
To me, it's just an internet forum. Why the need to be so structured.. I have no problem following threads I talk in... and I also like to read other threads concerning calgary etc.

I hate beaurocratizing things.
__________________
I used to be indecisive, but now I'm not sure...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2008, 9:36 PM
frinkprof's Avatar
frinkprof frinkprof is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Gary
Posts: 4,869
I voted yes. I generally like the format Josh proposes, and I would probably come up with something a little different. That's the thing though, everyone wants something different.

Also, Boris raises a good point, that regardless of a switch to a different format, it has become clear in recent months that some form of moderator or administrative intervention is needed, at least in the Calgary threads. I won't name names, but the information and conversational flow has been crippled and the things that make this corner of SSP great have been compromised. I have more thoughts on this topic, and I'd be happy to share them with the SSP moderation team if they were to ask either me or the group.

Anyway, as for the topic at hand, I'd be good with what Josh has proposed, other than the obvious joke about Edmonton sucking and Calgary ruling.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2008, 9:38 PM
freeweed's Avatar
freeweed freeweed is offline
Home of Hyperchange
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dynamic City, Alberta
Posts: 17,566
If anything, combining "roads" with "public transit" and calling it "transportation" would make the most sense. I really don't see the volume to justify two stickies for that, plus, how would we ever have calm, intelligent debate about transit vs cars? Kidding aside, as much as some might like to disagree, the two items are intricately linked and really feed off each other.

Doing that, it just strikes me that the only change needed would be to make the airport threads sticky (which I think is a good idea regardless). The food and entertainment discussions come up so infrequently that I never even notice them cluttering up the forum.

Here's a pickle: if we have a "Calgary entertainment" thread and a "Calgary development" thread, how the heck do we discuss the most important news story of the century, a replacement for the Saddledome? Virtually any discussion on that topic would cross over between the two threads, and then we'd have groups on both sides whining that there should be a THIRD thread (much like Edmonton has done for their arena discussion), and where does that go? What happens when someone mentions the LRT stations to the Saddledome, do we need thread moderators to shove that discussion into the transit/transportation thread, whereupon the folks there will complain about the inevitable hockey comments? I shudder to think of where a discussion about coming home on the LRT after hitting a really good bar after a hockey game would end up.

Eventually we'll just have both sections looking pretty much identical to the current set up, but with duplication everywhere. As you may be able to determine, I'm not a huge fan of artificial compatmentalization of knowledge. Everything is related to everything else.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2008, 9:42 PM
freeweed's Avatar
freeweed freeweed is offline
Home of Hyperchange
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dynamic City, Alberta
Posts: 17,566
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boris2k7 View Post
[*]more local moderation; right now, we have itom, who does a good enough job I guess, but we could use increased supervision and intervention from above (obviously, I cannot fulfill this role if available because I have little ability to remain a third party in most debates)
Props to Boris for having the integrity to state this. It's the same reason I always refuse to be a moderator/op role in any discussion format ever - I'm never impartial and I full well know it.

Personally though, I'm a fan of very little moderation. Mostly because I'm exceedingly tolerent of jackasses, but also because I know about the /ignore function. Now if only that applied to when other people not on your ignore list quote those that are, so you could fully eliminate the offender from your sight...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2008, 10:03 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 66,805
KISS

If it aint broke, dont fix it.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2008, 3:21 AM
jeffwhit's Avatar
jeffwhit jeffwhit is offline
effete latte-lifter
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Aalborg, DK
Posts: 3,689
I like this format proposal a lot. A Third Way, if you will

How typically, typically Albertan.
__________________
Arts!: Click to listen
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2008, 3:32 AM
itom 987's Avatar
itom 987 itom 987 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,046
Quote:
Originally Posted by josh white View Post
Sticky: Edmonton Sucks
Sticky: Calgary Rules
Josh, that isn't winning any positive diplomacy points.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2008, 5:12 AM
freeweed's Avatar
freeweed freeweed is offline
Home of Hyperchange
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dynamic City, Alberta
Posts: 17,566
Quote:
Originally Posted by itom 987 View Post
Josh, that isn't winning any positive diplomacy points.
Heh.

No doubt we also won't see any "Sticky: Alberta humour" threads.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2008, 5:47 AM
Greco Roman Greco Roman is offline
Movin' on up
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 3,449
Quote:
Originally Posted by itom 987 View Post
Josh, that isn't winning any positive diplomacy points.
It's a typical Calgarian attitude, joking or not. Not surprising.

Anyways, the current format is good the way it is.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2008, 5:52 AM
Hardhatdan Hardhatdan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,287
Yawn
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2008, 7:10 AM
CanadianCentaur's Avatar
CanadianCentaur CanadianCentaur is offline
Briareos Hecatonchires
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: The Big E
Posts: 3,806
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greco Roman View Post
It's a typical Calgarian attitude, joking or not. Not surprising.

Anyways, the current format is good the way it is.
Yeah, and that "typical Calgarian attitude" gets old really fast.
__________________
Edmonton/Amiskwacîwâskahikan Lat. 53° 34'N Elevation 671 m (2201 ft) Pop. 1,010,899 (2021 city) 1,418,118 (2021 metro) - North America's northernmost metro area over one million.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2008, 1:42 PM
freeweed's Avatar
freeweed freeweed is offline
Home of Hyperchange
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dynamic City, Alberta
Posts: 17,566
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanadianCentaur View Post
Yeah, and that "typical Calgarian attitude" gets old really fast.
Especially when it's coming from a typical Edmontonian attitude.

Or is it only OK to act like a jackass when you're from one city and not the other?

Seriously. People need to lighten up. The big bad Calgary ego monster isn't gonna steal you away in your sleep or anything.

Edit: Hrm. I thought that with the quotation marks you were poking fun at constant braying of the "typical Calgarian attitude" phrase. Just realized that my first comment makes far less sense if not. Ah well, never fear, Edmonton is better represented in the mod community than Calgary so I'm sure Josh or I will get banned soon.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2008, 2:30 PM
Wooster's Avatar
Wooster Wooster is offline
Round Head
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 12,688
Alright, alright. We'll change those two catagories to:

Sticky: Greco Roman has no sense of humour
Sticky: Typical Calgary attitudes

Anyway, seems like the crowd has spoken. No change.

And at least six people like josh white. Encouraging.

Last edited by Wooster; Mar 5, 2008 at 2:42 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2008, 2:44 PM
The Kid's Avatar
The Kid The Kid is offline
Kid Dynamic!
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 546
I know I haven't been posting at all the past couple of months but I am still following almost daily. I like things the way they are if we're still counting votes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2008, 5:09 PM
Greco Roman Greco Roman is offline
Movin' on up
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 3,449
Quote:
Originally Posted by josh white View Post
Sticky: Greco Roman has no sense of humour
Sticky: Typical Calgary attitudes
You are right. I do need a better sense of humor, so here is my contribution:

Calgary is full of crap.

Ha Ha Ha.

See, I have a sense of humor
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2008, 6:13 PM
freeweed's Avatar
freeweed freeweed is offline
Home of Hyperchange
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dynamic City, Alberta
Posts: 17,566
Now make it a sticky.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:34 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.