Not a great fan of high-rise apartments - yes, it's ironic that I insist on lurking around the various threads of Skyscraperpage, it's true. But the idea that they must be a certain height because of the Escarpment is one of the most incoherent arguments I've ever heard. It's the sort of proposition that a 12-year-old might put forth in a social studies paper - appropriate for the times, however.
Despite the obvious stupidity of these protests, it seems to be a very common complaint. I lived in another city some time ago where a few noisy residents objected to a proposed development that was to be sited next to the river.
'If this development goes ahead', they posited, 'how will we be able to see the river?' (from several blocks away).
These (learning disabled) people never seem able to come up with the solution that, perhaps, if they want to see the river (or the Escarpment), that GOING TO IT might serve them best!