HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #8041  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2021, 5:14 PM
Mazrim's Avatar
Mazrim Mazrim is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 1,403
Looks like they're planning to finally add an extra lane on Stoney between 16th Avenue and Airport Trail in the NE. It's desperately needed!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8042  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2021, 4:25 AM
Rollerstud98 Rollerstud98 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,737
Should be from 17th ave.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8043  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2021, 5:54 AM
craner's Avatar
craner craner is offline
Go Tall or Go Home
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 6,753
I agree - gotta widen south to 17th Ave SE.
It’s confusing, the list says 16th to Airport Tr. but the map shows a red line from 17th to Airport Tr.
http://https://www.alberta.ca/provincial-construction-program.aspx
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8044  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2021, 4:35 PM
Oliver Klozov Oliver Klozov is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 224
Stoney Trail and 11 Street NE Interchange Construction is out for tender - closes April 2, 2021.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8045  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2021, 10:12 PM
YYCguys YYCguys is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oliver Klozov View Post
Stoney Trail and 11 Street NE Interchange Construction is out for tender - closes April 2, 2021.
I had no idea that ANOTHER interchange was planned for that area! Is that going to be a full or partial interchange? Seems there will be a lot of interchanges in a short space in that section!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8046  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2021, 6:07 AM
holhm22 holhm22 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Calgary
Posts: 315
Quote:
Originally Posted by YYCguys View Post
I had no idea that ANOTHER interchange was planned for that area! Is that going to be a full or partial interchange? Seems there will be a lot of interchanges in a short space in that section!
A full interchange, but will be built as a half interchange initially:
City of Calgary page
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8047  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2021, 2:50 PM
YYCguys YYCguys is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,521
Quote:
Originally Posted by holhm22 View Post
A full interchange, but will be built as a half interchange initially
Golly! Those folks in the Coville area of Coventry Hills will have this interchange almost right outside their backyards! An interchange to nowhere (currently).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8048  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2021, 12:41 AM
sammyd sammyd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 103
Quote:
Originally Posted by YYCguys View Post
I had no idea that ANOTHER interchange was planned for that area! Is that going to be a full or partial interchange? Seems there will be a lot of interchanges in a short space in that section!
I think it is already roughed in from initial construction. You can see it when you drive by.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8049  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2021, 2:32 AM
milomilo milomilo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Calgary
Posts: 10,499
Do road designers in Calgary/Alberta ever ask the question; is this too many interchanges? Or is the minor increase in access more valuable than the increased weaving and decreased capacity on the road that matters?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8050  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2021, 3:02 PM
Cumberland Cumberland is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 2
The planning seems incoherent. They put in half interchanges in the south and west to limit weaving, then they plan to put this interchange in such close proximity to the adjacent interchanges.

If you're going to build full interchanges that close together, you need to put in basketweaves.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8051  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2021, 4:19 PM
Mazrim's Avatar
Mazrim Mazrim is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 1,403
Quote:
Originally Posted by milomilo View Post
Do road designers in Calgary/Alberta ever ask the question; is this too many interchanges? Or is the minor increase in access more valuable than the increased weaving and decreased capacity on the road that matters?
In my experience it's usually the road designers that hit the brakes on jamming in more access. If political/business forces want it bad enough, they just make it work as best as they can. There are limits though...look at Deerfoot and Stoney in the South and the uproar at the time when it was built by people who live in Cranston and Auburn Bay.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8052  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2021, 2:39 PM
milomilo milomilo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Calgary
Posts: 10,499
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mazrim View Post
In my experience it's usually the road designers that hit the brakes on jamming in more access. If political/business forces want it bad enough, they just make it work as best as they can. There are limits though...look at Deerfoot and Stoney in the South and the uproar at the time when it was built by people who live in Cranston and Auburn Bay.
Fair enough, that sounds believable.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8053  
Old Posted Mar 19, 2021, 12:06 PM
speedog's Avatar
speedog speedog is offline
Moran supreme
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,579
Drove by the short noise barrier wall on the noth side of Valley Ridge yesterday evening and yeah, it's a joke. It actually is shorter than the resident's fences directly behind it so really, I do not see the point of why monies were wasted on that ineffective noise barrier wall.

Also sucks for people owning homes backing out onto the TransCanada highway there as it is considerably above their properties - yeah, the TUC has been in place for decades but I can not think of any instances in Calgary in the over 40 years I've lived here where a section of roadway has been raised by so much. Now granted, they did purchase homes next to a major transportation corridor that was never going to be reduced in size and scope but that height adjustment is really quite stunning.
__________________
Just a wee bit below average prairie boy in Canada's third largest city and fourth largest CMA
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8054  
Old Posted Mar 19, 2021, 5:05 PM
Mazrim's Avatar
Mazrim Mazrim is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 1,403
Quote:
Originally Posted by speedog View Post
Also sucks for people owning homes backing out onto the TransCanada highway there as it is considerably above their properties - yeah, the TUC has been in place for decades but I can not think of any instances in Calgary in the over 40 years I've lived here where a section of roadway has been raised by so much. Now granted, they did purchase homes next to a major transportation corridor that was never going to be reduced in size and scope but that height adjustment is really quite stunning.
Definitely no examples of being raised a bunch and that close. I can think of a few places where the people who had generous distances from roads reduced when an interchange was built, or having a higher ramp built somewhat close by (Country Hills and Beddington, Stoney at Deerfoot and Stoney and Macleod), but this is more extreme. Geography isn't on Valley Ridge's side here with such a big hill to climb to the West. The really low design standards of the original interchange let them get away with a lot.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8055  
Old Posted Mar 22, 2021, 4:25 PM
Cage Cage is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: YYC
Posts: 2,742
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mazrim View Post
Definitely no examples of being raised a bunch and that close. I can think of a few places where the people who had generous distances from roads reduced when an interchange was built, or having a higher ramp built somewhat close by (Country Hills and Beddington, Stoney at Deerfoot and Stoney and Macleod), but this is more extreme. Geography isn't on Valley Ridge's side here with such a big hill to climb to the West. The really low design standards of the original interchange let them get away with a lot.
Is the current road placement the final location. I have a suspicion the road will eventually get lowered once the final alignment is complete for the bridge over the bow river, dropping the peak of the TCH to the west, and final alignment of the crestwood interchange.
__________________
United Premier a Elite latte lifter. Climber of swanky bridges.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8056  
Old Posted Mar 22, 2021, 7:27 PM
YYCguys YYCguys is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cage View Post
Is the current road placement the final location. I have a suspicion the road will eventually get lowered once the final alignment is complete for the bridge over the bow river, dropping the peak of the TCH to the west, and final alignment of the Crestmont interchange.
Fixed that for ya. Crestwood is a local road in Ogden.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8057  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2021, 7:33 PM
Mazrim's Avatar
Mazrim Mazrim is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 1,403
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cage View Post
Is the current road placement the final location. I have a suspicion the road will eventually get lowered once the final alignment is complete for the bridge over the bow river, dropping the peak of the TCH to the west, and final alignment of the crestwood interchange.
The new Valley Ridge/Crestmont interchange is going to be higher than the original interchange. This page shows a map with the original and proposed road profiles overlaid on each other: https://westringroad.ca/wp-content/u...ile_123020.pdf

All the new ramps are going to have to climb more to catch the new Trans-Canada roadway.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8058  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2021, 11:40 PM
Pegasus's Avatar
Pegasus Pegasus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 529
Looks like prep. work has commenced on the Stoney Trail bridge replacement project over the Bow River (by the McKenzie golf course). Traffic signs are up and clearing of the central reservation on the approach to the bridge has begun (to facilitate cross-over traffic?).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8059  
Old Posted Apr 16, 2021, 2:12 PM
craner's Avatar
craner craner is offline
Go Tall or Go Home
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 6,753
^Yeah I saw that yesterday too.
Are there any plans floating around for this bridge replacement ?
I’d like to see what they are planning in terms of additional lanes at the Cranston & Sundance overpasses.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8060  
Old Posted Apr 16, 2021, 8:49 PM
Pegasus's Avatar
Pegasus Pegasus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 529
Quote:
Originally Posted by craner View Post
^Yeah I saw that yesterday too.
Are there any plans floating around for this bridge replacement ?
I’d like to see what they are planning in terms of additional lanes at the Cranston & Sundance overpasses.
Alberta Transportation website show this project still in the design phase https://abtrans.maps.arcgis.com/apps...105b8defe05a2e

This map identifies design work on both EB and WB bridges, plus a pedestrian bridge. I assume demolition of the existing EB bridge can commence even though design of the new bridge is not yet complete.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:53 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.