A Pre-Application Conference has been scheduled by TVA Architects to discuss a project at 1650 NW Naito:
Quote:
New 17 story mixed use apartment building, 292 living units, first floor retail and parking, underground parking approximately 189 spaces. . Property to be divided prior to development.
__________________
"Maybe to an architect, they might look suspicious, but to me, they just look like rocks"
A project at 1650 NW Naito Parkway has been submitted for Type III Design Review by TVA Architects:
Quote:
new 17 story apartment building. 258 residential units are proposed. The first floor will have both residential and parking. There are 192 underground parking spaces. The access for the parking would be from NW Naito. Two loading spaces are proposed. The property will be divided to create a 79,700 square foot site for this development.
__________________
"Maybe to an architect, they might look suspicious, but to me, they just look like rocks"
Design Advice has been requested by TVA Architects for a project at 1650 NW Naito Parkway:
Quote:
new 17 story apartment building. 270 residential units are proposed. The first floor will have both residential and parking. There are 192 underground parking spaces. The access for the parking would be from NW Naito. One loading space is proposed. The property will be divided to create a 79,700 square foot site for this development.
__________________
"Maybe to an architect, they might look suspicious, but to me, they just look like rocks"
Where precisely is this project? Is the site a portion of the parking lot for the 3-story office building? Or does it replace the one-story building (think it is red/black?) closer to the Mills site?
Where precisely is this project? Is the site a portion of the parking lot for the 3-story office building? Or does it replace the one-story building (think it is red/black?) closer to the Mills site?
Immediately southeast of the existing office building, on a section of the site currently occupied by parking. There's a site plan in the pre-app notice linked above.
__________________
"Maybe to an architect, they might look suspicious, but to me, they just look like rocks"
Can someone explain to me why the North Pearl and South Waterfront seem to be stealing each other's zeitgeist? Cosmopolitan, NV, Vista and now this project all seem better suited for SW, at least as originally envisioned. Remember? Why, it was going to become a veritable forest of towers! A mini-Vancouver of sorts. Post-recession it's nothing but a sea of 8-storey apartment warehouses down there while the Pearl continues to go tall(er). What's up (or not) with that?
Prev
Linear Mode
