HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3941  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2020, 6:40 AM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by yotajoe View Post
Great news!

"The final two projects, which will receive over $27 million and $26 million respectively, will see the design and construction of three major mobility hubs and rapid bus lines along three corridors."

What is a real surprise is the "rapid bus lines". This may lead to BRT, and one day, an LRT....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3942  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2020, 3:41 PM
ericmacm's Avatar
ericmacm ericmacm is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: SW Ontario
Posts: 722
The "rapid bus lines" that they are describing could effectively be considered BRT. I'm glad to see this, it's a very ambitious project for a small city like Sudbury. It's always good to see smaller cities planning ahead, these projects are always so much easier to build earlier than later down the road.
__________________
Opinions expressed here are solely my own and do not represent those of my employer.

Come See My Work: Mississauga Future Skyline Model | Pan-Canadian Future Skylines Project - Kelowna, Saskatoon, Windsor, London, Hamilton, Niagara Falls, Barrie, Ottawa, Halifax​​​ | Astrophotography Thread
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3943  
Old Posted Aug 10, 2020, 12:04 AM
vid's Avatar
vid vid is offline
I am a typical
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Thunder Bay
Posts: 41,172
Meanwhile Thunder Bay has eliminated bus service and rendered the system nearly unusable. What a contrast!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3944  
Old Posted Aug 10, 2020, 4:52 AM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by ericmacm View Post
The "rapid bus lines" that they are describing could effectively be considered BRT. I'm glad to see this, it's a very ambitious project for a small city like Sudbury. It's always good to see smaller cities planning ahead, these projects are always so much easier to build earlier than later down the road.
Kinda makes me think of Ottawa's Transitways. They helped lay the groundwork for the LRT system.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3945  
Old Posted Aug 10, 2020, 3:33 PM
ericmacm's Avatar
ericmacm ericmacm is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: SW Ontario
Posts: 722
Quote:
Originally Posted by swimmer_spe View Post
Kinda makes me think of Ottawa's Transitways. They helped lay the groundwork for the LRT system.
That's exactly the point. Having a precursor to LRT, like a separated median/shoulder BRT or a BRT transitway makes it easier to upgrade later in the future. Sudbury has a very long way to go before LRT is ever in the picture, but having the ROW already set up will make the transition a lot cheaper and easier.

I suspect in this case, they'll probably go for shoulder or median bus lanes with some separated sections.
__________________
Opinions expressed here are solely my own and do not represent those of my employer.

Come See My Work: Mississauga Future Skyline Model | Pan-Canadian Future Skylines Project - Kelowna, Saskatoon, Windsor, London, Hamilton, Niagara Falls, Barrie, Ottawa, Halifax​​​ | Astrophotography Thread
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3946  
Old Posted Aug 11, 2020, 7:36 AM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by ericmacm View Post
That's exactly the point. Having a precursor to LRT, like a separated median/shoulder BRT or a BRT transitway makes it easier to upgrade later in the future. Sudbury has a very long way to go before LRT is ever in the picture, but having the ROW already set up will make the transition a lot cheaper and easier.

I suspect in this case, they'll probably go for shoulder or median bus lanes with some separated sections.
For once, Sudbury might be doing something right....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3947  
Old Posted Aug 11, 2020, 12:24 PM
Truenorth00 Truenorth00 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 24,404
Why is everybody talking about BRT? It's a decent development but they aren't building Transitways:

Quote:
Rapid bus lines will help to reduce bus travel time, increase transit ridership, and improve overall operational efficiency. The new corridors will include intersection improvements with dedicated turn lanes for buses, passenger waiting areas and shelters, fare vending machines and more.
Sounds like Züm in Brampton.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3948  
Old Posted Aug 11, 2020, 7:18 PM
TbayON TbayON is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Thunder Bay, NWO
Posts: 830
THUNDER BAY

Preliminary site work and foundation work is wrapping up for the new Motel 6 on Arthur Street. There hasn't been much activity on site the last couple of weeks.

City council voted to go ahead with the new indoor turf facility, estimated to cost anywhere between $32 million and $48 million (depending on who one asks). Construction could very likely begin this year if all proceeds as expected now. The project has been under scrutiny both because of budgetary concerns as a result of the Covid-19 budget shortfalls and a perceived lack of consultation/information.

Sounds like one, perhaps two new breweries are setting up shop in downtown P.A.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3949  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2020, 3:35 AM
ericmacm's Avatar
ericmacm ericmacm is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: SW Ontario
Posts: 722
Quote:
Originally Posted by Truenorth00 View Post
Why is everybody talking about BRT? It's a decent development but they aren't building Transitways:

Sounds like Züm in Brampton.
Züm is still a BRT. Bus rapid transit systems aren't exclusively limited to transitways. Some systems run on the shoulder or median in dedicated bus lanes without being fully separated. Mind you, it's definitely not as effective as full separation, but it's still rapid transit.
__________________
Opinions expressed here are solely my own and do not represent those of my employer.

Come See My Work: Mississauga Future Skyline Model | Pan-Canadian Future Skylines Project - Kelowna, Saskatoon, Windsor, London, Hamilton, Niagara Falls, Barrie, Ottawa, Halifax​​​ | Astrophotography Thread
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3950  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2020, 2:02 AM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,236
https://kenoraonline.com/local/three...ucture-funding
Quote:
The Lake of the Woods District Hospital will receive $319,999, the Dryden Regional Health Centre will receive $147,767 and the Riverside Health Care Facilities, in Fort Frances, will receive $108,379.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3951  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2020, 4:43 AM
yotajoe yotajoe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 147
https://northernontario.ctvnews.ca/p...ower-1.5133709

!4-story tower proposed for downtown Sudbury.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3952  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2020, 1:39 PM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by yotajoe View Post
https://northernontario.ctvnews.ca/p...ower-1.5133709

!4-story tower proposed for downtown Sudbury.
It is weird how people are reacting about it. "build this downtown, but move the arena far away". People say there is a problem with parking downtown, but hate the idea of a parking garage.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3953  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2020, 2:41 PM
yotajoe yotajoe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 147
Quote:
Originally Posted by swimmer_spe View Post
It is weird how people are reacting about it. "build this downtown, but move the arena far away". People say there is a problem with parking downtown, but hate the idea of a parking garage.
The cost is the issue, Sudbury residents love to complain that they have to pay to have nice things yet complain about not having nice things. The arena discussion is a huge can of worms, but from someone who lived in Sudbury for 20 years if its not all private money it probably wont be built.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3954  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2020, 4:07 PM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by yotajoe View Post
The cost is the issue, Sudbury residents love to complain that they have to pay to have nice things yet complain about not having nice things. The arena discussion is a huge can of worms, but from someone who lived in Sudbury for 20 years if its not all private money it probably wont be built.
While I would like to see the arena stay downtown. However, if you ignore downtown as an option, I do not understand how the best place is right beside the garbage dump of the city. When you stay at a hotel there and if your room faces NW, you will enjoy a view of the garbage dump.

The reality is, this land is not worth much as no one wants to live or work right beside the dump. There is no sound case for an arena that is not subsidized in Sudbury, so private money won't do it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3955  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2020, 5:08 PM
DoubleK DoubleK is offline
Near Generational
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,447
Quote:
Originally Posted by swimmer_spe View Post
While I would like to see the arena stay downtown. However, if you ignore downtown as an option, I do not understand how the best place is right beside the garbage dump of the city. When you stay at a hotel there and if your room faces NW, you will enjoy a view of the garbage dump.

The reality is, this land is not worth much as no one wants to live or work right beside the dump. There is no sound case for an arena that is not subsidized in CANADA, so private money won't do it.
Fixed your post.

Pretty sure the only arenas built without public funds were in Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3956  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2020, 6:03 PM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleK View Post
Fixed your post.

Pretty sure the only arenas built without public funds were in Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver.
Notice how they are all downtown?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3957  
Old Posted Oct 7, 2020, 1:11 AM
yotajoe yotajoe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 147
Quote:
Originally Posted by swimmer_spe View Post
Notice how they are all downtown?
And Ottawa?..

Personally I would love for the arena to be downtown and I was a fan of the plan that was revealed by the architecture firm. I know council is allowing a presentation to hear them out but thats a huge stretch. KED is way closer to reality in my opinion thats why I'm okay with it. I also don't think a casino would be bad either, but of course it would be way better downtown..
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3958  
Old Posted Oct 7, 2020, 5:38 AM
DavefromSt.Vital DavefromSt.Vital is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Yonge and Davisville
Posts: 696
Ottawa is in an awful location. They want to move closer to downtown just as Edmonton has done.

I like the reno proposal. Pushing out the envelope of the building to make a proper upper concourse with real concessions makes sense. Whichever proposal is chosen, something needs to happen. I have been to every OHL arena and I would have to say that Sudbury would be about the second worst in-arena experience. (Nothing compares to Flint). The tiny concourses, lack of concessions, lack of accessibility, the stench from the visiting team's dressing room, etc.

Not sure what the resistance is to parking garages. Many OHL arenas are adjacent to one (Saginaw, Guelph, London, Erie, Niagara, Ottawa, Hamilton, etc.)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3959  
Old Posted Oct 7, 2020, 1:47 PM
yotajoe yotajoe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 147
Quote:
Originally Posted by DavefromSt.Vital View Post
Not sure what the resistance is to parking garages. Many OHL arenas are adjacent to one (Saginaw, Guelph, London, Erie, Niagara, Ottawa, Hamilton, etc.)
Money is the problem, Sudbury is pretty much all hard rock and that makes it really expensive for site prep and excavation. Parking garages just increase that cost way more.

If they would move the rail yard outside the city that would solve the parking problem until the core grows.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3960  
Old Posted Oct 7, 2020, 1:57 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,236
Did Ottawa need to blast rocks for its arena too? The geology there isn’t all that simple either, with hard rocks here and unstable clay there.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:40 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.