HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #121  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2021, 7:39 PM
drummer drummer is offline
World Traveler
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Austin metro area
Posts: 4,479
Looks like we have a 4-story structure in there if the rendering is correct. That seems to be the highest to me.

While overall unimpressive, I'm sure these buildings will serve their functions and it really doesn't look all that bad. Not much interaction with pedestrians, but again, they are state buildings. All in all, an improvement with what's there at least from a visual standpoint.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #122  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2021, 8:22 PM
atxsnail atxsnail is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 551
Quote:
Originally Posted by drummer View Post
Looks like we have a 4-story structure in there if the rendering is correct. That seems to be the highest to me.

While overall unimpressive, I'm sure these buildings will serve their functions and it really doesn't look all that bad. Not much interaction with pedestrians, but again, they are state buildings. All in all, an improvement with what's there at least from a visual standpoint.
While we might someday end up with some of the new buildings and streets in that rendering, the actual new hospital is rather unimpressive, relatively forgettable, and mostly hidden from view. Maybe that's ideal for the needs of the patients, who knows. But from the outside looking in it doesn't scream, "MD Anderson of the brain" as Kirk Watson liked to describe it.

The actual plans are considerably different from the vision in the report. I'm sure it will still be nice enough, but I've lost hope for a meaningfully different ASH campus like in the original vision from the old rendering/report.

Here is a link to a 3D view of the new hospital building itself.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #123  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2021, 2:14 PM
H2O H2O is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,597
Utterly generic and depressing. Just what you don't want a mental health facility to be.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #124  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2021, 2:38 PM
ahealy's Avatar
ahealy ahealy is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: San Antonio / Austin
Posts: 2,564
Yeah, that's rather bland. Is this the final proposal for everything? It just seems like a modern version of some of their wards. My mom worked there in the 90's and let me tell you...that's far far better than what it is now.

Someone maybe needs to help the woman with the buzzcut tho....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #125  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2021, 3:43 PM
clubtokyo's Avatar
clubtokyo clubtokyo is offline
クラブトクヨ
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,095
The guy watering the plants looks depressed, this bland building is not helping.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #126  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2021, 4:54 PM
atxsnail atxsnail is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 551
I just took a closer look at my own link and I take back every bad thing I ever said about this place. Rotate around in the 3d view and drink in the awesomeness of that amazing baguette storage room.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #127  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2021, 4:56 PM
lonewolf lonewolf is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 546
what tf happened to landscape design in the past 10 years? especially in public places. seen some really unfunctional spaces and the trend seems to be increasing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #128  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2021, 4:57 PM
Echostatic's Avatar
Echostatic Echostatic is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: ATX
Posts: 1,364
Bask in its glory.

__________________
It can be done, if we have the will.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #129  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2021, 11:03 PM
atxsnail atxsnail is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 551
I just saw the following site plan filing pop up in a search on N Lamar (6416 N LAMAR BLVD):

JCI Threadgill's

The applicant proposes an office/retail and multifamily development with all associated improvements.


Has this been mentioned anywhere?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #130  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2021, 11:23 PM
The ATX's Avatar
The ATX The ATX is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Where the lights are much brighter
Posts: 12,045
Quote:
Originally Posted by atxsnail View Post
I just saw the following site plan filing pop up in a search on N Lamar (6416 N LAMAR BLVD):

JCI Threadgill's

The applicant proposes an office/retail and multifamily development with all associated improvements.


Has this been mentioned anywhere?
I saw that too, and I don't recall any discussion about it on the forum.
__________________
Follow The ATX on X:
https://twitter.com/TheATX1

Things will be great when you're downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #131  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2021, 1:43 AM
psychlotron psychlotron is offline
ATX USA
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Austin
Posts: 73
Quote:
Originally Posted by The ATX View Post
I saw that too, and I don't recall any discussion about it on the forum.
I was out riding my bike several weeks ago and passed through the Threadgill's parking lot. That's actually the best shortcut from my street to Lamar Blvd so I see that place from every angle. On that particular day Eddie Wilson's wife was out in the parking lot and she told me the place would be bulldozed and replaced with apartments. My heart sank, of course.

Now there's a fence around it. I assume that means demolition is coming soon.

It also means my shortcut to Lamar is blocked!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #132  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2021, 3:37 AM
MichaelB MichaelB is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: North edge of Downtown
Posts: 3,208
Quote:
Originally Posted by The ATX View Post
I saw that too, and I don't recall any discussion about it on the forum.
they moved fast and quiet so there would be no time for opposition.
So folks were told at the threadgills Auction
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #133  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2021, 4:09 AM
The ATX's Avatar
The ATX The ATX is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Where the lights are much brighter
Posts: 12,045
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelB View Post
they moved fast and quiet so there would be no time for opposition.
So folks were told at the threadgills Auction
I believe any building Demo permit triggers a review by the HLC or staff. I don't think they can sneak one by the City - except for that Jumpolin Pinata shop fiasco a few years ago.
__________________
Follow The ATX on X:
https://twitter.com/TheATX1

Things will be great when you're downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #134  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2021, 4:53 PM
H2O H2O is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,597
This is one I might actually be inclined to fight for. At least the original gas station building. It is truly historic! The site is a good size, but probably too narrow for a standard Texas Donut. If it is combined with some neighbors, it would be viable and could probably be designed to retain the original building in front. It would probably take a benevolent developer / music fan that is willing to take a loss for the sake of the music industry and history of the place. This one hurts! If it is lost, it will truly be the day that Austin changed for the worst, at least for me.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #135  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2021, 5:57 PM
shoreditch shoreditch is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 82
Maybe Mr. Musk would want to build a little goodwill in his new hometown?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #136  
Old Posted Jan 28, 2021, 1:22 PM
Sigaven Sigaven is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,477
I wonder if they'll keep the gas station building. I hope they do!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #137  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2021, 3:58 PM
Urbannizer's Avatar
Urbannizer Urbannizer is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: 360, St. Edwards
Posts: 12,380
https://austin.towers.net/preservati...eadgills-site/

Quote:
A multifamily residential development could be in the cards for the former restaurant and music venue Threadgill’s Old #1 at 6416 North Lamar Boulevard, which closed approximately a year ago — but the new owners hope to preserve part of the original building as a monument to this site’s storied past. That’s the latest from local developers Journeyman Group, which outlined its tentative plans to Austin’s Historic Landmark Commission earlier this week seeking feedback on how to best adapt the property for housing without losing the historic context of the venue.
__________________
HAIF
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #138  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2021, 4:13 PM
H2O H2O is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,597
This is great to hear! But it would be even better if they incorporated a music venue in the project.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #139  
Old Posted May 23, 2021, 7:53 AM
Urbannizer's Avatar
Urbannizer Urbannizer is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: 360, St. Edwards
Posts: 12,380
Alta Burnet

Anyone able to make out the location?

https://www.edi-international.com/alta-burnet

__________________
HAIF
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #140  
Old Posted May 23, 2021, 9:08 AM
mumu mumu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 140
Quote:
Originally Posted by Urbannizer View Post
Alta Burnet

Anyone able to make out the location?
Burnet and Rockwood, west side of Burnet. Bunch of slabs there now from light industrial warehouses.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:52 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.