Quote:
Originally Posted by 10023
It’s not offensive because it’s not talking about a person. It just means “Eastern”. There’s still an Orient Express train, etc.
I wonder if they’ll rename Occidental College next? Because that’s the same fucking thing.
|
Always seems like folks who aren't the subject of an purportedly offensive term are the first to say that the term isn't offensive. Even acting with indignation that anyone could think the term could be viewed as offensive and arguing that, given how long that term has been used, it should be exempt from change as a result of our evolving understanding of how that term may be offensive.
"It’s not offensive because it’s not talking about a person."
Except it is. The theater's name is tied to its fanciful/fictional depictions of scenes from the Far East (or East Asia to use a more modern term). Scenes that would, whether they are visible or not, be inhabited by the people therefrom.
"I wonder if they’ll rename Occidental College next? Because that’s the same fucking thing."
You are, if memory serves, living in London which is virtually the epicenter of Orientalism and you think "Occidental" is somehow equivalent? Sure in an alternate history where Oriens and Occidens were only ever used as Latin geographic terms. However that is not nearly the case especially after two or three centuries of colonial efforts in Eastern Asia.