HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions


View Poll Results: Next city to build 85-100 story building?
Houston 17 23.29%
Dallas 8 10.96%
Atlanta 13 17.81%
Austin 30 41.10%
Nashville 3 4.11%
Charlotte 2 2.74%
Voters: 73. You may not vote on this poll

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #41  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2020, 5:56 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is online now
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 29,815
Quote:
Originally Posted by BG918 View Post
With as flashy as Dallas is I am surprised their skyline is still pretty much the same as it was in the 90’s.
the 3 big southern skyline growers of the 70s/80s have all kinda stagnated at the top end.

between 1971 and 1992, houston, dallas, and atlanta combined to build 20 towers over 700' tall! (~26% of the national output)

however, over the past three decades since then, they have only combined to build 2 such towers, both in houston, one is currently U/C. (~2% of the national output)

and this has been during the largest 700+' skyscraper building period in our nation's history (thanks in large part to the booms in NYC, chicago, and miami).
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a great middle ground for many middle class families.

Last edited by Steely Dan; Jul 23, 2020 at 3:34 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #42  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2020, 7:02 PM
TexasPlaya's Avatar
TexasPlaya TexasPlaya is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: ATX-HTOWN
Posts: 18,344
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrnyc View Post
miami for condo, but texas for office or mixed use.
I see mixed use being able to crack the criteria sooner than condos.
__________________
"A society grows great when old men plant trees whose shade they know they shall never sit in."

"Such then is the human condition , that to wish greatness for one's country is to wish harm to one's neighbor" Voltaire
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #43  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2020, 7:31 PM
MonkeyRonin's Avatar
MonkeyRonin MonkeyRonin is offline
¥ ¥ ¥
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 9,914
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris08876 View Post
I believe for Toronto the reference was to:

1) The One ; 1,013 FT / 309 M | 85 FLOORS

Looks like its on hold.



2) One Younge ; One Yonge | 307 M | 95 FL | 263 M | 80 FL | 216 M | 65 FL

For One Younge (lol) ... I'd image its in phases. Is the 95 floor component rising 1st?


Although CTBUH does like one at 83 floors, maybe someone can reference the permits?

Building permit for The One is listed at 86 stories, but SSP and Urbantoronto databases have it at 85 stories (I'm assuming they're excluding the mechanical penthouse). It's under construction - work is definitely ongoing, and has recently reached grade level.

One Yonge is a multi-tower project, but the 95-storey Sky Tower is listed as under construction on SSP and UT. I believe it's only in the excavation stage now though.
__________________
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #44  
Old Posted Jul 25, 2020, 9:01 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 21,998
SSP is the best source for Toronto.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #45  
Old Posted Jul 25, 2020, 9:15 PM
JManc's Avatar
JManc JManc is online now
Dryer lint inspector
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Houston/ SF Bay Area
Posts: 37,947
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAYNYC View Post
Dallas could - and should, IMO - have the strongest (tallest and most dense) skyline in the Southwest + Southeast corridor (basically the area between Texas and the Carolinas). Problem is, the overwhelming majority of corporate office (both HQ and satellite / regional office) development in the area from the 90's until today has exploded north of 635 from the Galleria Area straight up the tollway into Plano, Frisco, etc. It seems that DFW companies large and small prefer the campus approach to building a 75-85 story tower downtown, and I'm assuming housing quality improves the further north one gets from downtown.

This issue seems to be far less prevalent in Greater Houston.
Not anymore. Campuses and mid-rises are far more popular than downtown high rises by a long shot.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #46  
Old Posted Jul 25, 2020, 10:05 PM
Northern Light Northern Light is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,227
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steely Dan View Post
Cool!

Which ones?

Neither are listed in the CTBUH database yet.

Did they start construction recently?

The highest floor count listed for Toronto in the CTBUH database is the U/C The One, which they list at 83 floors.
Top 3 under construction projects (height) in the Urban Toronto database are:

Pinnacle One Yonge 95floors/1,025ft

The One 85 Floors/1,012ft

YSL 85 Floors/981 ft

All are condos

In the 'proposed' space

Mirvish-Ghery is a condo project that been stalled a bit 91 Floors/1,079 ft

1200 Bay is a recent proposal 87 floors/1,070ft

Chelsea Green 85 stories/904ft

All the proposals are primarily residential

There are several office towers in the offing but none in this height range.

Union Park is the tallest office proposal at 58 floors/995ft

Commerce Court 3 clocks in at 64 floors but 990ft
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #47  
Old Posted Jul 26, 2020, 2:27 AM
wwmiv wwmiv is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Austin -> San Antonio -> Columbia -> San Antonio -> Chicago -> Austin -> Denver
Posts: 5,303
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonkeyRonin View Post
I voted Houston, just because it's extant towers are both the tallest and the most recent. Dallas and Atlanta haven't seen much high-rise growth at the top end of height in recent years (Houston is also dominated by 80s towers, but at least has a couple from recent years and one U/C).

Though, I understand its growth is a bit sluggish at the moment - so it likely won't happen until the next boom cycle. Austin and Nashville are growing like gangbusters right now, but conditions there are likely still a long way of from making an 85+ storey tower viable. They lack the corporate base for an office tower of that height; and lack the high land values for a residential tower.
Austin does not lack the proper land values. That’s why the city is building up relative to its peers.
__________________
HTOWN: 2305k (+10%) + MSA suburbs: 4818k (+26%) + CSA exurbs: 190k (+6%)
BIGD: 1304k (+9%) + MSA div. suburbs: 3826k (+26%) + adj. CSA exurbs: 394k (+8%)
FTW: 919k (+24%) + MSA div. suburbs: 1589k (+14%) + adj. CSA exurbs: 90k (+12%)
SATX: 1435k (+8%) + MSA suburbs: 1124k (+38%) + CSA exurbs: 18k (+11%)
ATX: 962k (+22%) + MSA suburbs: 1322k (+43%)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #48  
Old Posted Jul 26, 2020, 10:54 AM
Maldive's Avatar
Maldive Maldive is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,212
Atlanta by a nose.

Apologies for adding to the T.O. tangent but a visit to SSP diagrams show proposed office towers Commerce Court 3 (302 metres architectural top + a 74 m flagpole) and Union Park (303 metres architectural top) to be legit supertalls... if the overlords at CTBUH approve. YSL remains a huge gaping hole with a new (much-loathed) developer taking over the project.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #49  
Old Posted Jul 27, 2020, 1:15 PM
C. C. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,017
When the OP was talking about the next southern city to build a tower in the 85-100 story range, I doubt he indented to mean southern Ontario.

Toronto would definitely win the contest since y'all put up a new 85 story tower every other month it seems like.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #50  
Old Posted Jul 27, 2020, 6:57 PM
Maldive's Avatar
Maldive Maldive is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,212
^lol... good one. My first line was on topic ;-)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #51  
Old Posted Jul 27, 2020, 8:00 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 21,998
Does it really matter when they are so many other North American cities ahead of the South? It's like saying Bismarck has the best skyline in the Dakotas (just a guess)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #52  
Old Posted Jul 27, 2020, 8:09 PM
craigs's Avatar
craigs craigs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,832
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper View Post
Does it really matter when they are so many other North American cities ahead of the South? It's like saying Bismarck has the best skyline in the Dakotas (just a guess)
No, Fargo has the best skyline in the Dakotas, hands down.


source
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #53  
Old Posted Jul 27, 2020, 8:30 PM
plinko's Avatar
plinko plinko is offline
them bones
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Santa Barbara adjacent
Posts: 7,399
Considering there are only about 70 of these (85+ floors) in the world, it's definitely a unique club.

Miami seems like the only contender here amongst Southern cities.
__________________
Even if you are 1 in a million, there are still 8,000 people just like you...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #54  
Old Posted Jul 27, 2020, 10:33 PM
0214685226 0214685226 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 75
I went back and forth between Dallas and Atlanta. I ended up voting for Dallas based off of momentum in the state of Texas. I'm not sure when that will happen if ever, but it seems like the most logical place for a new 85 story building. I don't think any city outside of New York, Chicago and San Francisco actually need an 85 story building. There is plenty of land in all of these cities to build plenty of 50 story buildings.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #55  
Old Posted Jul 27, 2020, 10:45 PM
James Bond Agent 007's Avatar
James Bond Agent 007 James Bond Agent 007 is offline
Posh
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kansas City, MISSOURI
Posts: 21,155
Quote:
Originally Posted by austlar1 View Post
I'm betting no southern city will build that tall in the next ten years, if ever.
This.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #56  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2020, 12:36 AM
dc_denizen's Avatar
dc_denizen dc_denizen is offline
Selfie-stick vendor
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New York Suburbs
Posts: 10,999
with covid who knows, but I expect places like houston and dallas will continue to add tons of multi-family units (eg Dallas, which had 50-60,000 multifamily units under construction for several years), even without the trophy condo buildings inhabited by rich foreigners.
__________________
Joined the bus on the 33rd seat
By the doo-doo room with the reek replete
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #57  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2020, 12:47 AM
JManc's Avatar
JManc JManc is online now
Dryer lint inspector
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Houston/ SF Bay Area
Posts: 37,947
Quote:
Originally Posted by wwmiv View Post
Austin does not lack the proper land values. That’s why the city is building up relative to its peers.
Downtown Austin has momentum and appeal. There's Lady Bird Park/ Lake right there (huge plus) plus all the eateries and bars. I'd live there in a NY minute. Can't say the same about other Texas cities.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #58  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2020, 2:09 AM
Shawn Shawn is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 5,941
I'm no construction industry expert, but on Arch Boston we have a bunch of actual developers, PMs, and architects working for the big guys. To a person, they're saying capital markets for large new projects are frozen solid and will be for the foreseeable future. To quote one of the more knowledgeable members, "Debt capital markets are freaked out about construction lending right now, credit is super expensive and the last thing that lenders like is uncertainty. They get paid to NOT take risks on stuff, and there is way way way too much going on to finance a project this size. Furthermore the big syndicates that would take pieces of a deal this size are kind of out of the market because of all the junk they need to deal with in their existing book, they're not going to float a $700MM loan on a ground up deal that's a total flier right now."

I don't see anything this size going up anywhere in the US in the next decade outside of NYC and maybe Chicago and Miami. No one has any appetite for this level of risk.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #59  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2020, 2:50 AM
plinko's Avatar
plinko plinko is offline
them bones
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Santa Barbara adjacent
Posts: 7,399
^Small projects (<$40-$50M) though seem to still be funded left and right. It’s been shocking and happy to still see.
__________________
Even if you are 1 in a million, there are still 8,000 people just like you...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #60  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2020, 3:08 AM
Shawn Shawn is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 5,941
Quote:
Originally Posted by plinko View Post
^Small projects (<$40-$50M) though seem to still be funded left and right. It’s been shocking and happy to still see.
Same in Boston. Construction is booming now as everyone tries to get back on schedule from April and May's shutdown. But no one is getting an 80 story building for $50MM.

Maybe Miami can still do it, as a lot of those towers are spec and are funded by EMEA and LatAm groups, as opposed to local heavyweights and national firms like we have in Mass, who avoid spec like the plague.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:49 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.