Quote:
Originally Posted by HooverDam
AH, so its not a roof thats important, its trusses none of us have ever seen- my word, that certainly changes things.
|
Have you seen the interior of Tovrea Castle? I haven't. Nobody has in 30 years except the people that are renovating it. That doesn't mean it's not there and that it's not important.
I'm sure there's a way to incorporate the trusses in and around the concrete support columns and things like that, perhaps by leaving the roof over the museum space as is. (ding ding?) But given Sarver's tactics so far I just don't trust that he'd spend an extra $40 to do it. After having been lied to and pushed around, I don't blame the Sun Merc folks for suing.
Quote:
I don't see how you could choose the former. I know someone is going to say something like "well I want a third option, I want the Bruder design, or the hotel and the Sun Mercs super special trusses", but thats not an option, sorry.
|
That's exactly the problem with the process so far. It is a given that Sarver et al are going to develop it simply because they lease space at the arena. It is a given that they are going to select the best and only design. It is a given that alternative options (I'm really not crazy about Bruder's design) are impossible. It is a given that they are reputable and this is going to happen, but, contradictingly, they need tax dollars or public property first. It is a given that anybody opposed to the project in its current form is opposed to it in its entirety, because any suggestions they would have to improve the project are wrong anyway. It is a given that Phoenix will be developed not from ivory tower penthouses, neighborhood councils, nor swank engineering offices, but in superior court, because that's damn near where every project ends up. What the hell?
Why is it that in Phoenix people give developers so much leeway with the public good? Why do we place so much faith in them to do exactly the right thing when every single time I've heard the argument before they've been proven wrong? People toss out euphemisms like revitalisation and progress when we really don't know those are given.
Even as an aside, the definitions of progress in this town are many. Yours does not necessarily fit mine, so it is almost spurious to put it out there to begin with. It's progress to an element I don't think is critical to downtown's success except for the professional basketball players who will be staying there.
If the W was really going to happen or had to happen it would be happening now. The fact that we are subsiding it says that there's no reason to build it--in a normal market it should've been proposed hitherto on any number of vacant lots. Perhaps if there were no Sarver, that would be happening without a fight. Sarver, on the other hand, is fine getting tied up and monopolising Phoenix's path to a W. If it had to get built, Sarver would have started going to the negotiating table in earnest.
But if Sarver wants to prove his salt, he can build the toilet first. Then he can flush Sun Merc into it. It's very easy to look at a boring brick cube compared to the significant height (its only redeeming quality) of the W and say that's progress, but the scenario that I fear is Sun Merc's destruction (in its current form) for no damn reason. If Sun Merc gets torn apart, and for whatever reason the W doesn't happen, we're left with a fraction of what we started with.
Let's bring this back on topic--CityScape. Compare the approved project with what we first saw. Everybody associated with the savepatriotspark.org movement was derided for the same reasons the Sun Merc folks are now. But if we had shut up, we wouldn't be getting a better project--I like the flexible event space, etc. That's my solace out of the eight months I put into it. Why shouldn't Sarver be held to the same public standard?