HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #321  
Old Posted May 10, 2020, 1:34 AM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 66,803
One game against each team, everyone makes the playoffs as per seeding... single game elimination, winner take all.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #322  
Old Posted May 10, 2020, 7:17 PM
craner's Avatar
craner craner is offline
Go Tall or Go Home
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 6,755
^Just the 9th place team does not make playoffs to pare it down to 8 teams ?
1 vs 8, 2 vs 7, 3 vs 6, & 4 vs 5 ?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #323  
Old Posted May 10, 2020, 9:08 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 66,803
Bingo.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #324  
Old Posted May 11, 2020, 2:22 PM
jonny24 jonny24 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Hamilton, formerly Norfolk County
Posts: 1,169
Quote:
Originally Posted by thurmas View Post
https://3downnation.com/2020/05/09/c...loan-question/

2- Shorten the regular season but make the playoffs longer. Maybe have a 12 or 14 game regular season but make the playoffs a best of 2 or best of 3 series each round other than grey cup. This will make all games more meaningful and important and will increase tv ratings during the playoffs and make rivalries even more intense.
I have a problem with this part. To me it makes no sense to play single games all season, then need a series, to determine who goes on to a single game.

If a single game is good for the final, it's good for the semifinals. If multiple games are needed to decide who goes to the final, multiple games are needed for the final. One or the other.

As for playing in-conference only - I'd argue that this would ensure the East stays weak, if they never get to test themselves against the (currently) stronger West teams until the playoffs.

Other than that, great post
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #325  
Old Posted May 11, 2020, 2:37 PM
thurmas's Avatar
thurmas thurmas is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 7,598
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonny24 View Post
I have a problem with this part. To me it makes no sense to play single games all season, then need a series, to determine who goes on to a single game.

If a single game is good for the final, it's good for the semifinals. If multiple games are needed to decide who goes to the final, multiple games are needed for the final. One or the other.

As for playing in-conference only - I'd argue that this would ensure the East stays weak, if they never get to test themselves against the (currently) stronger West teams until the playoffs.

Other than that, great post
Main reason I did not include Grey Cup as a series is due to so many fans for Grey Cup are tourists who come in to the host city for 3 or 4 days during Grey Cup week it would not be feasible for them to go from city to city and the Grey Cup being a big event would be diluted somewhat if a series. As for the east being weak they have had 40 years to catch up to the west and have failed to do so and that division needs a real shot in the arm to rekindle fan interest and I think interdivisional play would help with that as the records would be more competitive and with arch rivals as the main opponents it would help draw more fans to games. My 5 point plan would try to model more the U.S. college football big event game day on a weekend and less games in the regular season would make them more meaningful and bigger events. thanks though for the thumbs up
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #326  
Old Posted May 11, 2020, 5:18 PM
jonny24 jonny24 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Hamilton, formerly Norfolk County
Posts: 1,169
Quote:
Originally Posted by thurmas View Post
Main reason I did not include Grey Cup as a series is due to so many fans for Grey Cup are tourists who come in to the host city for 3 or 4 days during Grey Cup week it would not be feasible for them to go from city to city and the Grey Cup being a big event would be diluted somewhat if a series.
I agree with all of that, therefore I would say no series-playoffs. One offs are great

Quote:
As for the east being weak they have had 40 years to catch up to the west and have failed to do so and that division needs a real shot in the arm to rekindle fan interest and I think interdivisional play would help with that as the records would be more competitive and with arch rivals as the main opponents it would help draw more fans to games.
Also a valid argument. I've wondered myself why it seems so systemic. I guess it really must be success = dollars = resources = success? And being the only game in town helps some of the Western teams ride out periods of no success?

Quote:
My 5 point plan would try to model more the U.S. college football big event game day on a weekend and less games in the regular season would make them more meaningful and bigger events. thanks though for the thumbs up
With you on that! I mean, I happily go to 9 games a year and sometimes more if Toronto is at home and Hamilton isn't playing, but if I could only go to 7 but the league was more successful for it, why not?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #327  
Old Posted May 11, 2020, 6:17 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
I like the idea of having a short season and playoffs, but man the logistics sure get complicated. Would it be worth it for the imports to travel here, quarantine for two weeks and then go into training camp/regular season if they're only playing like 8 regular season games?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #328  
Old Posted May 11, 2020, 6:37 PM
thurmas's Avatar
thurmas thurmas is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 7,598
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
I like the idea of having a short season and playoffs, but man the logistics sure get complicated. Would it be worth it for the imports to travel here, quarantine for two weeks and then go into training camp/regular season if they're only playing like 8 regular season games?
I am highly doubtful there will even be an 8 game season this year. CFL needs a serious reboot next year and they should also consider bringing back revenue sharing like the NFL has done since the 60's. It doesn't help the health of the CFL when the Riders can generate $42 million a year in revenue for themselves while the Argos can only generate $ 10 million a year.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #329  
Old Posted May 11, 2020, 7:53 PM
elly63 elly63 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 7,889
Quote:
Originally Posted by thurmas View Post
I am highly doubtful there will even be an 8 game season this year. CFL needs a serious reboot next year and they should also consider bringing back revenue sharing like the NFL has done since the 60's. It doesn't help the health of the CFL when the Riders can generate $42 million a year in revenue for themselves while the Argos can only generate $ 10 million a year.
I believe they do now share Grey Cup profits and Ambrosie is probably trying to move them to revenue sharing but the problem is little, isolated Saskatchewan would have to transfer funds to help prop up a team in an area of 6 million people. That's not an easy sell.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #330  
Old Posted May 11, 2020, 8:05 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by elly63 View Post
I believe they do now share Grey Cup profits and Ambrosie is probably trying to move them to revenue sharing but the problem is little, isolated Saskatchewan would have to transfer funds to help prop up a team in an area of 6 million people. That's not an easy sell.
Especially when it's a community owned team propping up MLSE, of all organizations. The idea that part of some farmer's Rider shirt purchase proceeds would go into Rogers' pockets would be a little hard to stomach

But that said, the Riders and possibly a couple other western teams might not exist if it weren't for the revenue sharing largesse of the eastern teams in the 70s and 80s.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #331  
Old Posted May 11, 2020, 8:46 PM
thurmas's Avatar
thurmas thurmas is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 7,598
It's frustrating as a fan knowing there are so many things that can be done to improve the business side of the CFL as the product on the field is great but that the board of governors and league office are so hesitant to make the changes necessary.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #332  
Old Posted May 11, 2020, 11:13 PM
elly63 elly63 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 7,889
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
Especially when it's a community owned team propping up MLSE, of all organizations. The idea that part of some farmer's Rider shirt purchase proceeds would go into Rogers' pockets would be a little hard to stomach

But that said, the Riders and possibly a couple other western teams might not exist if it weren't for the revenue sharing largesse of the eastern teams in the 70s and 80s.
Your first paragraph really had me gagging but the second brought me back to reality.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #333  
Old Posted May 12, 2020, 2:26 PM
thurmas's Avatar
thurmas thurmas is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 7,598
Ti-Cats Scott Mitchell on their financial predicament

https://3downnation.com/2020/05/12/t...games-in-2020/

Q: Can you explain how the league got to asking for $150 million?
Mitchell: You can get to the numbers very quickly. We can do a great job of educating our fans and being more transparent. With the Ticats, our total player costs are closer to $7.5 million rather than $5 million, that includes everything you do from injuries to some of the other stuff you can do with the players, your benefits, your pension and everything else. The total football operations piece is generally about half of what your total operations are for the season. In our particular case, if you think about our entity on the Ticats side as a $25 million business, it’s about half of that is football operations, that’s all football operations, and half of it is just running the business.
For us in particular the Ticats we will have by the end of the month burned close to $6 million dollars to get prepared for the year. Typically you’re spending that money to prepare for a season and you’re investing that money to get yourself in a situation where you can put on the events. Clearly in our particular case, and I think you’ll see this from other teams, you’re looking at somewhere in that $12 million shortfall if you’re not playing any games, per team.
When you add that together obviously you get to a number that’s north of $100 million dollars, combined with the league office challenges. And then you get into the situation around the uncertainty of when will you be able to get back into playing games with fans, putting on events where all your revenue streams come from. Is that in September? Is that in November? Or is that in March? Or is that in June of 2021?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #334  
Old Posted May 12, 2020, 3:11 PM
khabibulin khabibulin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,112
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
Especially when it's a community owned team propping up MLSE, of all organizations. The idea that part of some farmer's Rider shirt purchase proceeds would go into Rogers' pockets would be a little hard to stomach

But that said, the Riders and possibly a couple other western teams might not exist if it weren't for the revenue sharing largesse of the eastern teams in the 70s and 80s.
And how eager would TSN, or any broadcaster, be to pay $50 million annually to a Canadian league with no teams in Toronto, Montreal or BC?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #335  
Old Posted May 13, 2020, 8:29 PM
thurmas's Avatar
thurmas thurmas is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 7,598
Blue Bombers just posted a $3.5 million dollar profit for the 2019 season. Obviously 2020 looks much darker and ominous which is unfortunate considering all of the momentum the club was having in merch sales after the Grey Cup win.

https://www.tsn.ca/after-profitable-...2020-1.1475430
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #336  
Old Posted May 13, 2020, 9:12 PM
HomeInMyShoes's Avatar
HomeInMyShoes HomeInMyShoes is offline
arf
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: File 13
Posts: 13,984
Noontime call-in program was about the CFL asking for money. Even with season ticket holders that called in the overwhelming opinion (usually the negative side) was that fans are fed up with teams asking and taking more and more.

I'd say the odds of the government giving them any money is none to less than none. One caller even floated the idea of folding the Eastern half of the CFL and only having a Western League.
__________________

-- “We heal each other with kindness, gentleness and respect.” -- Richard Wagamese
-- “Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, Nothing is going to get better. It's not.” -- Dr. Seuss
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #337  
Old Posted May 13, 2020, 9:36 PM
thurmas's Avatar
thurmas thurmas is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 7,598
Quote:
Originally Posted by HomeInMyShoes View Post
Noontime call-in program was about the CFL asking for money. Even with season ticket holders that called in the overwhelming opinion (usually the negative side) was that fans are fed up with teams asking and taking more and more.

I'd say the odds of the government giving them any money is none to less than none. One caller even floated the idea of folding the Eastern half of the CFL and only having a Western League.
Rod Pedersen show had 68% fan approval for it last week. The league has to have the player association involved, present a concrete proposal to parliament and have a plan to pay the money back and a plan to improve the leagues finances overall be it revenue sharing, interdivisional play to cut travel costs, cutting executive pay, trimming scouting and coaching departments staffs ect..
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #338  
Old Posted May 14, 2020, 1:25 AM
HomeInMyShoes's Avatar
HomeInMyShoes HomeInMyShoes is offline
arf
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: File 13
Posts: 13,984
I'd say that is just the comparison of the audiences. I don't think either is a great indication of support for either yes or no.
__________________

-- “We heal each other with kindness, gentleness and respect.” -- Richard Wagamese
-- “Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, Nothing is going to get better. It's not.” -- Dr. Seuss
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #339  
Old Posted May 14, 2020, 2:30 AM
VANRIDERFAN's Avatar
VANRIDERFAN VANRIDERFAN is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Regina
Posts: 5,166
Quote:
Originally Posted by HomeInMyShoes View Post
Noontime call-in program was about the CFL asking for money. Even with season ticket holders that called in the overwhelming opinion (usually the negative side) was that fans are fed up with teams asking and taking more and more.

I'd say the odds of the government giving them any money is none to less than none. One caller even floated the idea of folding the Eastern half of the CFL and only having a Western League.
Was that Blue Sky on CBC?
If it was then that audience will be overwhelmingly against anything supporting professional sport. Thats just they way they are, not saying that they are right or wrong, just that that is opinion of people who listen to CBC Radio.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #340  
Old Posted May 14, 2020, 2:55 AM
HomeInMyShoes's Avatar
HomeInMyShoes HomeInMyShoes is offline
arf
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: File 13
Posts: 13,984
I was just struck that season ticket jolfers of 25 years are also in some cass fed up with the take and take and take if the teams. I wouldn't support giving thrm any money because at this point a few teams aren't contrubuting yo the heslth of the leagur. Even in the crappiest days of the 80s snd 90s. SK was still drawing 18000. This league is not healthy. Putting money into it is not a money making option.
__________________

-- “We heal each other with kindness, gentleness and respect.” -- Richard Wagamese
-- “Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, Nothing is going to get better. It's not.” -- Dr. Seuss
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:48 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.