MUMBAI | Waves | Height | 80 FLOORS

[Altauria]

Originally Posted by schuylkiller

.....not at all what I'd call pedestrian friendly.

I'm sure you're not talking about those Automobiles driving on the sidewalks in the first picture.

[excel]

nice.

[spyguy]

Originally Posted by firstcranialnerve

Ewww, the architect is like the kid who copies others in class and even does so incorrectly. This looks like a very horrible simplistic aqua.....

Aqua was not the first to have undulating balconies to create a ripple effect.

[Rico Rommheim]

I like it! Good for Mumbai! Indian skyscraper architecture is really interesting.

[Lecom]

Originally Posted by AdrianXSands

ummm... a REALLY bad AQUA rip-off, anyone??

Nope, don't see it.

As much as I love Aqua, it did not invent curves on building sides. Besides, the balconies here are arranged the way they are for a totally different effect.

[Northwest]

Well, India wont be trumpeting this as their own unique thing. But they certainly can build it and enjoy it for what it is.
You have my permission to move forward with this! Good luck!

[Lecom]

It is indeed unique; if not, show me a building in the world that's a good deal similar. Curved facade is a very vague reference to Aqua, and this tower's streamined hanging garden approach is entirely different than Aqua's flowing waves of shallow balconies.

[NDPhilly]

Yea it does remind me of Aqua in Chicago except this one isnt glass.