HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #461  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2023, 10:31 PM
rrskylar's Avatar
rrskylar rrskylar is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: WINNIPEG
Posts: 7,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by bomberjet View Post
What were the expectations? Gas stations are the first thing First Nations develop. Provides revenue and cheap gas for members. Win win.

Plans are here:
https://c7r.1b6.myftpupload.com/wp-c...aster-Plan.pdf

Phase 1 is this piece and then the Canada Lands section in the SW corner of the project.
Seriously, not a lot of margin selling gasoline, not a lot of employment either not that they worry about that!

Guess the whole project will be a larger version of Thunderbird House!

Won't be long before they section off and sell parcels of the land
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #462  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2023, 12:36 AM
cllew cllew is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 3,991
Quote:
Originally Posted by rrskylar View Post
Seriously, not a lot of margin selling gasoline, not a lot of employment either not that they worry about that!

Guess the whole project will be a larger version of Thunderbird House!

Won't be long before they section off and sell parcels of the land
Somebody I knew had a Esso Station in North Kildonan (now closed by Esso) and a gas and go ate all his gas profit for the day. He said he made his money on his car wash and convenience store sales.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #463  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2023, 2:30 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 13,782
Ya that's what I've heard. They make money off all the other stuff. Fuel get's you there. Same for Costco or Candian tire. The gas bars are a service. Seems like CT is getting rid of them.

The FN gas stations get their members gas at the reduced price, which saves them all money. They will also like be selling smokes, cannabis, whatever else they can. It will also be a draw to get people to their property. Plans for a casino/event centre on that site as well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #464  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2023, 2:43 PM
Justanothermember Justanothermember is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2023
Posts: 292
What a farking POS development

So much potential on that land.......lost for good.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #465  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2023, 4:00 PM
rrskylar's Avatar
rrskylar rrskylar is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: WINNIPEG
Posts: 7,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by Justanothermember View Post
What a farking POS development

So much potential on that land.......lost for good.
Exactly, always the lowest common denominator for FN developments in Manitoba!

Huge chunk of land with loads of potential and they build a fucking gas bar!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #466  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2023, 4:57 PM
wags_in_the_peg's Avatar
wags_in_the_peg wags_in_the_peg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 3,228
stop the negative crap, give it time. yes we been waiting decades, but theres huge plans, we've all seen them. yeah its a gas station now, but there much more coming

https://treaty1.ca/wp-content/upload...aster-Plan.pdf
__________________
just an ordinary Prairie Boy who loves to be in the loop on what is going on
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #467  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2023, 5:30 PM
pspeid's Avatar
pspeid pspeid is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,734
Quote:
Originally Posted by wags_in_the_peg View Post
stop the negative crap, give it time. yes we been waiting decades, but theres huge plans, we've all seen them. yeah its a gas station now, but there much more coming

https://treaty1.ca/wp-content/upload...aster-Plan.pdf
Couldn't agree more. This is a huge development that will take time to see it's completion.

I'm honestly not sure what some people wanted to see here. The residential components are greatly needed, and the location of the retail seems to fit well into the area. I suppose people can dream of having a cluster of high-rises, or two or three 20,000 seat arenas and wave pools, but that's just not realistic. The development is going to benefit both the First Nations communities that are developing it and the city. Win-win as far as I'm concerned.

DISCLAIMER: I am fully aware no-one suggested "two or three 20,000 seat arenas and wave pools". This is called "hyperbole"; a "purposeful exaggeration" not meant to be taken seriously, used to emphasize or draw attention to a certain element in the narrative.

Learning moment over.
__________________
"Opinion is really the lowest form of intelligence"-Bill Bullard

"Naysayers are always predicting the present"-Anon.

"Rudeness is the weak man's imitation of strength"-Eric Hoffer
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #468  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2023, 6:11 PM
peg's Avatar
peg peg is offline
keep the good times going
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Downtown Winnipeg
Posts: 414
Agreed, although not perfect these plans are pretty promising. Give it time.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #469  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2023, 6:58 PM
FactaNV FactaNV is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2023
Posts: 575
Quote:
Originally Posted by pspeid View Post
Couldn't agree more. This is a huge development that will take time to see it's completion.

I'm honestly not sure what some people wanted to see here. The residential components are greatly needed, and the location of the retail seems to fit well into the area. I suppose people can dream of having a cluster of high-rises, or two or three 20,000 seat arenas and wave pools, but that's just not realistic. The development is going to benefit both the First Nations communities that are developing it and the city. Win-win as far as I'm concerned.

DISCLAIMER: I am fully aware no-one suggested "two or three 20,000 seat arenas and wave pools". This is called "hyperbole"; a "purposeful exaggeration" not meant to be taken seriously, used to emphasize or draw attention to a certain element in the narrative.

Learning moment over.
I think people were expecting some urbanist paradise on Kenaston. It was unrealistic but they're disappointed that this prime land's first new buildings since the barracks days are a gas station and strip mall, the antithesis of urbanism. People need to realize it was never about urbanism, it's about making money for the Treaty One signatories. The housing comes later.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #470  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2023, 8:27 PM
EdwardTH EdwardTH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 465
Quote:
Originally Posted by FactaNV View Post
I think people were expecting some urbanist paradise on Kenaston. It was unrealistic but they're disappointed that this prime land's first new buildings since the barracks days are a gas station and strip mall, the antithesis of urbanism. People need to realize it was never about urbanism, it's about making money for the Treaty One signatories. The housing comes later.
For real. Hard not to notice how a First Nations group is getting absolutely blasted for building the exact same type of commercial development that everybody else builds everywhere else. Seasons of Tuxedo right next door is all parking lots and box stores and - GASP - a gas station, I don't remember people losing their shit over the "wasted potential" there.

Westport festival is the same crap. They just put up a bunch of box stores and strip malls on Taylor in a much more urban location, nobody seemed to care. But god forbid the natives do it too right?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #471  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2023, 8:45 PM
Justanothermember Justanothermember is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2023
Posts: 292
Quote:
Originally Posted by wags_in_the_peg View Post
stop the negative crap, give it time. yes we been waiting decades, but theres huge plans, we've all seen them. yeah its a gas station now, but there much more coming

https://treaty1.ca/wp-content/upload...aster-Plan.pdf
Perhaps I've jumped the flag. My understanding was that is was going to be a much sparser and bleaker development than what you have linked, like the original U of M proposal for the gold course. This actually looks better. Did it change over time?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #472  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2023, 8:49 PM
pspeid's Avatar
pspeid pspeid is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,734
Quote:
Originally Posted by EdwardTH View Post
For real. Hard not to notice how a First Nations group is getting absolutely blasted for building the exact same type of commercial development that everybody else builds everywhere else. Seasons of Tuxedo right next door is all parking lots and box stores and - GASP - a gas station, I don't remember people losing their shit over the "wasted potential" there.

Westport festival is the same crap. They just put up a bunch of box stores and strip malls on Taylor in a much more urban location, nobody seemed to care. But god forbid the natives do it too right?
Sadly, I've suspected this as well.
__________________
"Opinion is really the lowest form of intelligence"-Bill Bullard

"Naysayers are always predicting the present"-Anon.

"Rudeness is the weak man's imitation of strength"-Eric Hoffer
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #473  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2023, 8:56 PM
plrh plrh is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 788
Quote:
Originally Posted by EdwardTH View Post
For real. Hard not to notice how a First Nations group is getting absolutely blasted for building the exact same type of commercial development that everybody else builds everywhere else. Seasons of Tuxedo right next door is all parking lots and box stores and - GASP - a gas station, I don't remember people losing their shit over the "wasted potential" there.

Westport festival is the same crap. They just put up a bunch of box stores and strip malls on Taylor in a much more urban location, nobody seemed to care. But god forbid the natives do it too right?
I think there is a higher expectation out of government developments generally. This is a First Nation's government project not a private development, so I don't think money should not be the highest consideration. Governments should not compete with private businesses, generally. So unless they can provide something better than a private developer in order to serve their constituents I don't they should be in the development game.

When the province developed the Bridgwater neighbourhoods, they initially promised something better than a private development and then cut it back later. So the province also failed on their development. Two wrongs don't make a right.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #474  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2023, 9:10 PM
EdwardTH EdwardTH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 465
Quote:
Originally Posted by plrh View Post
I think there is a higher expectation out of government developments generally. This is a First Nation's government project not a private development, so I don't think money should not be the highest consideration. Governments should not compete with private businesses, generally. So unless they can provide something better than a private developer in order to serve their constituents I don't they should be in the development game.

When the province developed the Bridgwater neighbourhoods, they initially promised something better than a private development and then cut it back later. So the province also failed on their development. Two wrongs don't make a right.
But I thought the whole point was to give First Nations income streams and reduce their dependence on gov't funding. This isn't a public park or public amenity. It IS a private development, where the developer is a First Nation and the intent is to generate as much revenue as possible for them. Based on what other private developers choose to build, this is the most profitable and effective way to do that.

Now in general I agree that we should hold ALL developers to higher standards, what's best for their profit margin isn't necessarily best for the city. But it would be pretty unfair to tell this particular developer they can't develop their land that way when everybody else is allowed to.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #475  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2023, 9:18 PM
plrh plrh is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 788
Quote:
Originally Posted by EdwardTH View Post
But I thought the whole point was to give First Nations income streams and reduce their dependence on gov't funding. This isn't a public park or public amenity. It IS a private development, where the developer is a First Nation and the intent is to generate as much revenue as possible for them. Based on what other private developers choose to build, this is the most profitable and effective way to do that.

Now in general I agree that we should hold ALL developers to higher standards, what's best for their profit margin isn't necessarily best for the city. But it would be pretty unfair to tell this particular developer they can't develop their land that way when everybody else is allowed to.
I can agree with that. I didn't know that its purpose was solely to generate income. Not much different than Bridgwater.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #476  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2023, 9:32 PM
EdwardTH EdwardTH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 465
Quote:
Originally Posted by plrh View Post
I can agree with that. I didn't know that its purpose was solely to generate income. Not much different than Bridgwater.
I mean I guess it's a bit of both, some of the recreational & cultural components they're planning are more like amenities for their community members. But yeah my understanding of urban reserves is that typically they're trying to develop land as a revenue stream for their bands.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #477  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2023, 10:05 PM
Kinguni's Avatar
Kinguni Kinguni is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Manitoba
Posts: 1,420
The best use for the land where the gas station is going is a gas station, as that's what the CAF had there before.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #478  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2023, 10:14 PM
FactaNV FactaNV is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2023
Posts: 575
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kinguni View Post
The best use for the land where the gas station is going is a gas station, as that's what the CAF had there before.
I still think the CAF should have kept a parcel for a new super-armoury like Denison Armoury or Debney Armoury. The state of Minto Armouries is atrocious and LCol Harcus Strachan Armoury is getting too small for the two lodger units. Strachan Armoury is 100% original and would be great for a museum but modern facilities are really needed for Army Reserve personnel. Maintenance bays, quartermaster space, classrooms, barracks, messes, hangars, etc.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #479  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2023, 11:31 PM
rrskylar's Avatar
rrskylar rrskylar is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: WINNIPEG
Posts: 7,641
Between Kapyong, U of M Southwood golf course land and the Forks land all sit waiting at glacial speed for anything to actually transpire!
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:17 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.