Quote:
Originally Posted by Busy Bee
Wow you put a ton of effort into that. You even edited it. Impressive. Doesn't change the fact that the design looks completely lame. If this was a Habitat for Humanity project with no fancy architecture firm attached to the venture, we'd all be slamming it. You know it's true.
|
yeah, right-clicking to copy/paste GIF links off Google was so much effort. i edited it because i kept finding GIFs that i liked, and your obnoxious (as is often the case) pop-in comment was deserving of multiple eye rolls. levity was kind-of the point, though.
in fact, i like the built designs so far. and i like the overall siting. could it be denser? sure. but St. Louis has plenty of empty land waiting for infill. also, these homes will have considerably better amenities than Habitat homes, though there's nothing wrong with Habitat homes. they've built some good stuff in St. Louis—better than what some market-rate developers are building.
your feelings on this development are noted. now give it a rest, please.