HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #81  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2021, 1:48 AM
tech12's Avatar
tech12 tech12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Oakland
Posts: 3,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by iheartthed View Post
San Francisco
San Francisco is not majority white.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #82  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2021, 2:35 AM
tech12's Avatar
tech12 tech12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Oakland
Posts: 3,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by iheartthed View Post
Put another way, San Francisco never really experienced white flight, although the city did experience population decline.
that's a weird thing to say

SF white population:

1950 - 693,888 - 89.5%
1960 - 604,403 - 81.6%
1970 - 511,186 - 71.4%
1980 - 402,131 - 59.2%
1990 - 388,341 - 53.6%
2000 - 385,728 - 49.7% (Non Hispanic white: 338,909 - 43.6%)
2010 - 390,387 - 48.5% (non Hispanic white: 337,451 - 41.9%)

SF nonwhite population:

1950 - 81,469 - 10.5%
1960 - 135,913 - 18.4%
1970 - 204,488 - 28.6%
1980 - 276,843 - 40.8%
1990 - 335,618 - 46.4%
2000 - 391,002 - 50.3%
2010 - 414,848 - 51.5%

SF's white population started dropping nonstop right when nonwhite people started moving into the city in large and ever-growing numbers. But sure, there's no connection whatsoever.

It's true that white flight wasn't as bad as some other places though, and didn't result in massive abandoned areas and whatnot.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #83  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2021, 4:17 AM
craigs's Avatar
craigs craigs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,799
Quote:
Originally Posted by iheartthed View Post
Put another way, San Francisco never really experienced white flight, although the city did experience population decline. Between 1980 and 2010 the city's white population declined by only 23k and the black population by almost 40k.
tech12 has the receipts, and they show a more complex reality than what you are trying to assert here.

Between 1980 and 2010, San Francisco added more than 200,000 new residents--a 30% population increase--yet the city's white population still managed to decline numerically, and to drop from 59.2% to 48.5% of the population (and down to 41.9% for non-hispanic whites).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #84  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2021, 2:29 PM
iheartthed iheartthed is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 9,877
Quote:
Originally Posted by tech12 View Post
that's a weird thing to say

SF white population:

1950 - 693,888 - 89.5%
1960 - 604,403 - 81.6%
1970 - 511,186 - 71.4%
1980 - 402,131 - 59.2%
1990 - 388,341 - 53.6%
2000 - 385,728 - 49.7% (Non Hispanic white: 338,909 - 43.6%)
2010 - 390,387 - 48.5% (non Hispanic white: 337,451 - 41.9%)

SF nonwhite population:

1950 - 81,469 - 10.5%
1960 - 135,913 - 18.4%
1970 - 204,488 - 28.6%
1980 - 276,843 - 40.8%
1990 - 335,618 - 46.4%
2000 - 391,002 - 50.3%
2010 - 414,848 - 51.5%

SF's white population started dropping nonstop right when nonwhite people started moving into the city in large and ever-growing numbers. But sure, there's no connection whatsoever.

It's true that white flight wasn't as bad as some other places though, and didn't result in massive abandoned areas and whatnot.
My earlier post was poorly worded. I meant during the period when San Francisco's black population dramatically collapsed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:03 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.