Quote:
Originally Posted by Empire
Not sure if your silly comment is directed at me but I have never complained about the library either from a design or budget perspective. I think it's great for the city and in particular this part of the city.
This city needs a swift kick in the butt and this project delivers. We have little or no public buildings that combine an outdoor space with a fantastic interactive indoor venue. My only disappointment so far is the exposed concrete and no matter how you like to spin it you can't put lipstick on a pig.
Take some time and go through the New York Public Library. It will take a couple of hours if you start with a coffee or smoothie and sit in the connected Bryant Park and soak in the history that surrounds this great 42nd St. / 5th Ave. venue. At Christmas, they install a skating rink, a portable restaurant and multiple well designed holiday shops that house Christmas vendors. These are removed after the season is over.
The library is Beaux Arts design constructed of marble and shows that you don't build a grand building and leave 5% or 10% not representing the overall intent of the structure. The main reading room is nothing short of awe inspiring and the grand map room is complete with teak ceiling and of course, lots of marble.
Our budget didn't allow for this grandeur but exposed concrete outside will weather and look like Duke tower and inside will look unfinished and out of sync with the rest of the design. If there a lot of air pockets in the columns maybe they can fill them with grout or say it is part of the design.
|
If you could do me the favor of sparing me the condescending tone in regards to my "silly" comment, I might take you up on that. My original comment was to try and stop the thread spiraling into KP's personal "Hate" rant on the project.
I was only pointing out the fact it's pretty standard, for institutional buildings that are trying to achieve a high LEED certification, to use exposed concrete in an abundance of areas. This project, I believe has it only on the interior except for the planters and back area. The graphics for the interior look like a computer generated version of "concrete". If the right contractor was in to do the pillar they would have vibrated most of the air bubbles out column knowing it was to be exposed.
During the exchange of lands Dalhousie now owns the rest of the Infirmary lands in which the "Bold Ambitions" plan shows the area, is to be turned into a "quad" for the Sexton Campus.
When I first seen the back area the thought that came to my mind was a stage for an expanded "Buskers Festival" that stretched up to Robbie Burns park and Public Gardens. But thats just a delusional pipe dream