Quote:
Originally Posted by worldlyhaligonian
I feel as though they should hold two meetings... one for all of the people against and one for the people that are for a development, that way it would be more fair in terms of what is expressed.
Typically anti-development folks make blanket "normative" statements... This is really unfair because although no real points are made, the anti-development folks appear to represent the majority.
|
Wordly, I have to say that your comment seems to be a blanket 'normative' statement, and a generalization. It could also be argued, incorrectly, that pro-developmnet folks do the same thing: "if it's big, it's good'.
The folks at the meeting, mostly, had legitimate concerns, which were well articulated. Few were anti-development, but they were concerned about waht is proposed for our neighborhood. Some of what is proposed for the site is not suitable for that site. The building on Ochterloney will dwarf the greenvale, and takes up the whole frontage on that street. The tower will also do the same on the other side. The greenvale is lovely. Anything that is added there needs to be considerate of what is now there. I would like to see a 3d of how the developmnet will fit. The renderings were only of the buildings, not of the stretscape/neighborhood. JET