HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > Halifax > Business, Politics & the Economy


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #161  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2018, 1:10 AM
Dartguard Dartguard is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 670
I agree Keith, there seems to be something else at play here with both Brison and Fillmore missing in action in relation to the Ports future. I wonder if the Federal Liberal grand plan is to move cargo operations to Medford or Sydney in C.B. as Halifax has that Navy thing, not to mention the 60 Bill Shipbuilding contract. Former P.M. Jean Chretien has openly lobbied for one if not both of the C.B. operations and old Jean never had any love for Halifax so who knows?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #162  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2018, 1:16 PM
Ziobrop's Avatar
Ziobrop Ziobrop is offline
armchairitect
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Halifax
Posts: 721
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dartguard View Post
I agree Keith, there seems to be something else at play here with both Brison and Fillmore missing in action in relation to the Ports future. I wonder if the Federal Liberal grand plan is to move cargo operations to Medford or Sydney in C.B. as Halifax has that Navy thing, not to mention the 60 Bill Shipbuilding contract. Former P.M. Jean Chretien has openly lobbied for one if not both of the C.B. operations and old Jean never had any love for Halifax so who knows?
i forget Chretien was "lobbying" for sydney.
fuck.
they are plotting to fuck us, and try to make us like it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #163  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2018, 1:38 PM
MonctonRad's Avatar
MonctonRad MonctonRad is online now
Wildcats Rule!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Moncton NB
Posts: 34,605
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ziobrop View Post
i forget Chretien was "lobbying" for sydney.
fuck.
they are plotting to fuck us, and try to make us like it.
CB is faithful Liberal territory - the home of Dave Dingwall and all his cronies.

HRM is more fickle and tends to lean towards the NDP. Of course JT is going to reward CB (especially when your local Liberal representatives are so weak).
__________________
Go 'Cats Go
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #164  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2018, 2:00 PM
Keith P.'s Avatar
Keith P. Keith P. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,016
Don't forget longtime Liberal Party insider and bagman Richie Mann's involvement in the Melford operation. It all is starting to smell like a rotting fish.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #165  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2018, 6:35 PM
OldDartmouthMark OldDartmouthMark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 8,476
You all have just reminded me why I despise politics so much!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #166  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2018, 8:47 PM
Dartguard Dartguard is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 670
I travel to C.B. for business a couple times of year and the lack of hope except at Membertou is palpable. There is a barely disguised contempt for Halifax as "they get everything".

I remember the 1995 Federal budget that devastated C.F.B. Halifax and made C.F.B. Shearwater a lodger unit of C.F.B. Halifax. Over 5,000 job losses that thankfully turned into former Military pensioners that for the most part chose to stay in Halifax. Chretien was also responsible for the EH-101 cancellation contract that would have made the Halifax area a major Training and Maintenance base for EH-101 operations in North America. Ironically Harper bought the cancelled VH-71 program that Obama shot down which has to amount to one of the greatest giveaways the Yanks have ever given an Ally. Harper bought 9 airframes and 27 Tractor trailer loads of AW-101 parts for 168 Million CDN. The Program cost the Yanks 2 Bill USD before Obama cancelled it. At least Trudeau is about to make at minimum 5 of the Airframes flyable again and IMP will get most of the work. Hopefully Jean does not hear about DAT.

Yup Fillmore and Brison seem to be good little Liberal pups sitting in the corner and not peeing on the carpet.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #167  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2018, 9:23 PM
OldDartmouthMark OldDartmouthMark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 8,476
Maybe some of the container traffic could be diverted from the Port of Montreal to help bolster Sydney...

...yeah, like that would happen...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #168  
Old Posted Oct 28, 2018, 11:27 PM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 33,694
A report for regional council on the future of the port: https://www.halifax.ca/sites/default...1030rc1416.pdf

It has a lot of interesting details and attempts to address a bunch of the questions that have been floating around. The report suggests that the truck traffic has little impact on Cogswell in the sense that the Cogswell design would be the same with or without the truck traffic. The report enumerates a few different ways to mitigate the truck traffic, and explains why the port of Halifax is important nationally and is not easy to replace by shifting traffic somewhere else (to say nothing of the cost of rebuilding the infrastructure). It is close to the major American ports, can currently handle large container ships, and is the deepest port on the east coast. The report suggests that if Halifax loses business it will be American ports that gain the most, not Canadian ports.

It still seems incredibly short-sighted to think that the truck traffic is an existential crisis for the port, or that it is possible to cannibalize the port to send the business to other areas like Cape Breton.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #169  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2018, 11:42 AM
IanWatson IanWatson is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,227
Quote:
Originally Posted by someone123 View Post
A report for regional council on the future of the port: https://www.halifax.ca/sites/default...1030rc1416.pdf

It has a lot of interesting details and attempts to address a bunch of the questions that have been floating around. The report suggests that the truck traffic has little impact on Cogswell in the sense that the Cogswell design would be the same with or without the truck traffic. The report enumerates a few different ways to mitigate the truck traffic, and explains why the port of Halifax is important nationally and is not easy to replace by shifting traffic somewhere else (to say nothing of the cost of rebuilding the infrastructure). It is close to the major American ports, can currently handle large container ships, and is the deepest port on the east coast. The report suggests that if Halifax loses business it will be American ports that gain the most, not Canadian ports.

It still seems incredibly short-sighted to think that the truck traffic is an existential crisis for the port, or that it is possible to cannibalize the port to send the business to other areas like Cape Breton.
Funny thing about that report is that its origin is listed as "Public discussion and debate on the future of the South End Container Terminal and Port of Halifax." Usually report origins are either an applicant request, or a Council request for information. This makes it sound like it was written by staff on their own initiative. I can't recall ever seeing that before.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > Halifax > Business, Politics & the Economy
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:10 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.