Quote:
Originally Posted by beanmedic
The problem is that this guy took a supply of waterfalls and keeps trying to drum up demand for them. When that started, Hamilton didn't have much going on. That has changed. Yet very few people care about the waterfalls, except the same group that head out every few weeks, shine coloured lights on them, and pat themselves on the back.
|
I have to ask - is your issue with promoting the waterfalls, or with
who has been promoting the waterfalls?
I've got no problem with Ecklund spending his own money, time, and resources doing that, nor with anyone who wants to be part of it. I was always aware of a number of the waterfalls but they've highlighted so many more I did not know about.
If the city wants to embrace that as part of its broader tourism strategy, it makes sense to me to partner up and build on what's been done (but if there's an exchange of funds, it does deserve scrutiny, simply on the basis of it being tax dollars). This also applies to other organizations in the city - like the museums, conservation authority, RBG, festivals, etc.