HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southwest


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #721  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2008, 12:19 AM
Locofresh55's Avatar
Locofresh55 Locofresh55 is offline
Todo para la familia
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Back in Tucson
Posts: 489
Quote:
Originally Posted by kaneui View Post
Hotel at UA tech park gets regents' blessing
By Aaron Mackey
ARIZONA DAILY STAR
09.27.2008

FLAGSTAFF — The UA will build a hotel and conference center on Tucson's Southeast Side at its Science and Technology Park under a proposal approved Friday by regents. The 123-room hotel, which UA leaders say is crucial to the development of the technology park, will include a 7,400-square-foot conference center and cost roughly $23 million to build.

Officials said it will be the only hotel within seven miles of the University of Arizona Science and Technology Park and will allow companies there to use much-needed conference rooms and lodging. A non-profit company will be created by the UA, University Hotel Corp., to manage the overall project, with Legacy Hospitality LLC of Nevada operating the hotel. Legacy manages hotels worldwide, including several Hilton Garden Inns and Holiday Inns, says its Web site.

But even as UA officials touted the potential profit the hotel could bring, one regent voted against the proposal over concerns the bonds used to finance the project would hurt the university in the long run. Regent Anne Mariucci opposed the project and the bonds because she said it counts against the UA's debt finance ratio established by the state. The project might not be necessary at this time, she added. "Can we afford to do something with that precious capacity of our debt ceilings?" Mariucci asked. "I think it calls again into question the strategic feasibility of the project and what this hotel is doing for us."

However, UA officials said whether the debt actually counts against the UA's bottom line is an open question. The project is being managed by a corporation, and the tech park has authority to finance projects independent of the UA. Therefore, it's the university's position the project doesn't count against its debt, said Bruce Wright, associate vice president for economic development. Wright also argued that the hotel would not be used just by the companies in the tech park but also by visitors to Southeast Side neighborhoods. "It's the fastest-growing region in that area," he said. "This will be a really important community asset."

Construction on the project would begin in June with an anticipated opening in September 2010. In its first year, the hotel would charge an average rate of $119 per night with a projected occupancy rate of close to 70 percent, the regents were told. UA President Robert Shelton said the hotel will be a welcome addition. "Having a hotel and conference center at the park will be essential to further development there," he said. "We believe that this project will not only be viable but will enhance revenues at the UA."
With this hotel and a supposed super target coming to Kolb and I-10 area....there better be more super markets and such coming to the southeast side...and no I´m not talking about Rita Ranch. I live on Wilmot and I-10 and it´s about time to get some commercial/retail development there....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #722  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2008, 5:45 AM
kaneui kaneui is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,561
^Speaking of development on the southeast side, it looks like Westcor will be master-planning over 12,000 acres as shown on the map below, with a probable build-out time of 30-40 years:






Huge Southeast side development will reach far beyond its borders
By Danielle Sottosanti
ARIZONA DAILY STAR
10.02.2008

A 12,000-acre development on the Southeast Side will be so large that it will affect other parts of Tucson, attendees of a recent town hall meeting said. Phoenix-based developer Westcor is creating an overview plan for residential, commercial, industrial and retail development on nearly 12,000 acres of state land in Ward 4, along South Houghton Road. It would be a 20-year project in a perfect world, but more realistically it's a 30- or 40-year project, said Mitch Stallard, vice president for Westcor. In January, the State Land Department gave Westcor an urban planning permit for the area, which is the second-largest state land parcel ever designated for master planning. Though Westcor will create the plan for the area, the state is still the property owner and the land will be sold in parts by public auction.

Stallard and lead Tucson consultant Jim Portner gave a presentation on the project Sept. 22 at Ward 2's Eastside City Hall, 7575 E. Speedway. About 20 people attended the meeting, which included a question-and-answer session with Stallard and Portner. They told attendees they are looking at all uses for the area, from residential to commercial to civic.

Ward 2 Councilman Rodney Glassman explained why his ward held a meeting about a development that will take place in neighboring Ward 4. "It's a significant portion of our city. It will both create additional burdens on our infrastructure as well as opportunities for our residents," Glassman said. The development will lead to more traffic but also more jobs on the East Side, he said.

West Side resident Tracy Williams said she has questions about the development. "I'm very concerned about natural resources and the impact that this very large development will have on the quality of life for all of us," said Williams, a lifelong Tucson resident of 50 years. The biggest question asked at the meeting was who will pay for the infrastructure, she said.

But Ward 4 Councilwoman Shirley Scott disagrees the development's infrastructure requirements will be a burden to taxpayers and spoke of the area's future benefits to Tucson. "Since the new development can pay for that itself, then the 'pressure on infrastructure' question is moot," she said. One way the area could pay for itself is if the City Council set up a community facilities district, she said. If that occurs, someone buying property in the district would pay an extra fee based on the property's assessment. "I think it is a good idea to plan a large area within the city limits of Tucson," Scott said. "I think the benefits will be city-wide and not limited to the general location."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #723  
Old Posted Oct 7, 2008, 5:12 AM
kaneui kaneui is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,561
In a nod to serious water conservation, the City Council will consider making Tucson the first city in the nation to require new commercial developments to use rainfall for 50% of their landscaping water needs:



Issac Figueroa, a member of a crew from Pro Service Landscape, works beside a row of 8-foot-tall rainwater tanks that
eventually will supply all the irrigation needed by the plants at Southwest Hazard Control, an environmental-cleanup company.
(photo: Arizona Daily Star)


Developers may win 50%-rain rule
by Tony Davis
ARIZONA DAILY STAR
10.06.2008

Standing at the entrance to the new West Side office of Southwest Hazard Control, an environmental-cleanup firm, are 11 corrugated metal tanks, all 8 feet tall and 6 feet in diameter. After the West Grant Road site's native mesquites and yuccas and the South American jacaranda trees become established in a year or two, every drop of their irrigation water will come from the tanks.

On Oct. 14, the Tucson City Council will vote on an ordinance to require new commercial developments to harvest rainwater. If it's approved, most of those affected likely won't go that far. The proposal, supported by the city's staff and an advisory committee, mandates that 50 percent of a development's landscaping water must be from rainfall. That's down from a proposed 75 percent that the committee had endorsed last spring and from some environmentalists' original hope for 100 percent.

The change was made in the name of flexibility after developers said 75 percent would be too costly and otherwise would be difficult to meet. Not everyone is happy about it. The committee voted 8-4 last month to recommend the lower figure. Environmentalist dissenters said the group was moving without adequate discussion. Even now, not all developers are on board with the new proposal, but they're clearly happier.

But all factions involved agree that a 50 percent ordinance still would put the city in the vanguard. It would bring water conservation one more step toward the foreground during a drought that many scientists say threatens the city's long-term supply of Colorado River water, backers say. Most committee members who voted against the latest change still support the current proposal. It's the only one of its kind in the nation, as far as Tucson officials know. "We have to address the issue of drought, and we need to provide for as much creativity as possible when it comes to water conservation," said Ward 2 Councilman Rodney Glassman, who pushed the water-harvesting proposal. "Fifty percent is not the end goal. It is the minimum standard. It is just the beginning."

City staffers and advisory committee members said the key factor making 50 percent more flexible is that according to staff calculations, that wouldn't force developers to install expensive cistern tanks. Instead, they could use "earthworks," a buzzword for the practice of building berms or contouring slopes on a site to guide rainwater to trees and shrubs. Or developers could depress curbs near landscape areas so water would flow into them. "When people typically think of rainwater harvesting, they think of corrugated metal tanks next to the house. This will be something different," said Kevin Barber, an architect on the water-harvesting advisory committee. "It was found that there is sort of a breaking point — somewhere around 50 percent — where it would require both tanks and earthworks."

Rob Paulus, the architect who designed the Southwest Hazard landscaping system, agreed that a 75 percent rule isn't desirable, even though his site will use 100 percent. The water-harvesting system there costs a little over $1 per gallon of stored water, he said, compared with an estimate from the business-backed Metropolitan Pima Alliance of $2 to $4 per gallon for a cistern system. But Paulus said that every site needs to be considered separately, and the city should give incentives such as permit-fee waivers to encourage harvesting.

The alliance, representing a wide range of business interests and also including some government officials, voted last week to endorse the 50 percent standard. A Tucson Chamber of Commerce official said that 50 percent is much more reasonable than 75 percent. "There could be scenarios where cisterns are the least expensive option, but now at least the developer has different options to choose," alliance Director Michael Guymon said.

On the environmentalist side, Sierra Club committee representative Matt Hogel said the 50 percent standard is too low, because he believes Tucson is 15 years away from a water crisis. The Tucson Audubon Society and the Sonoran Institute were mainly concerned that after hearing the city staff analysis on Sept. 18, they needed more time to digest what they felt were complex calculations. City staffer Ann Audrey said her studies found that roughly a 50 percent standard gives developers the flexibility to handle year-to-year fluctuations in rainfall. Another desert reality that must be considered is that some areas get more rain than others during a storm, she said.

Advisory committee member Brad Lancaster, a harvesting expert who has written two books on the subject, said he believes that if developers plant low-water-use plants — which city codes already require — they can meet a 75 percent goal once plants are established. Lancaster was out of town for the committee vote, didn't otherwise take sides on the 50-75 percent issue and now supports the proposal. But conditions for plants at a shopping center are far harsher than in the natural desert, replied Audrey, of the city's Office of Conservation and Sustainable Development.

A critical point that wasn't discussed is the balancing act between dealing with a continuing drought that could be aggravated by global warming, while the business community faces a serious economic crunch, said Amy McCoy of the Sonoran Institute. "We don't want to create an ordinance that puts an onerous financial burden upon people," McCoy said. "We're trying to find that spot where we can use this untapped resource of rainwater in an economical and efficient way."

Councilman Glassman defended the decision to move quickly, saying that all sides originally had agreed to an Oct. 14 vote. As for the committee membership, he said he wanted balance. He noted that a few months ago, the Southern Arizona Home Builders Association had criticized as unfair another committee recommendation to make gray-water plumbing mandatory in new homes, because existing homes use far more water. The recommendation became law last month after SAHBA withdrew its objection. "Perhaps there's balance in everyone feeling it's unbalanced," Glassman said.


IF YOU GO
What: City Council water-harvesting discussion.
Where: In Council Chambers, 250 W. Alameda St.
When: Meeting starts at 7 p.m. Oct. 14.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #724  
Old Posted Oct 14, 2008, 6:20 AM
kaneui kaneui is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,561
The restoration of historic downtown buildings continues...the county is planning to spend $780,000 restoring the 1929 facade on the Walgreens building it owns at the prime downtown corner of Pennington and Stone, with the hopes it will attract potential buyers:



The Walgreens building at 44 N. Stone Ave., shown in the 1930s, is getting a restored facade.
The building was originally a Montgomery Ward in 1929. Architects believe the 1930s look can be
restored in less than two years. (photo: Tucson Citizen files)


Restorative work on 1929 Walgreens building is under way
by TEYA VITU
Tucson Citizen
10.13.2008

Early design work is under way to restore the 1929 facade on the Walgreens building, 44 N. Stone Ave., which started life as a Montgomery Ward. Pima County awarded a $68,970 contract one month ago to Poster Frost Associates to design the project. It includes restoring the original facade underneath and determining how to remove the 1956 modernist facade visible now.Architect Corky Poster, a principal at Poster Frost, believes the 1929 look can be in place within 18 months. A precise construction schedule won't be known until the 1956 facade is removed, said Reid Spaulding, director of the county's Facilities Management Department.

The county owns the building and is doing the $780,000 facade work to make the structure more attractive to potential private-sector buyers. County bond funding is in place for what is informally called the Roy Place Building in honor of the architect who designed the Ward building and had his office there. "We're taking off the skin that's there to see what we have," Spaulding said. Poster estimates he'll be ready to peel off the 1956 facade in about four months.

Poster had his kick-off meeting Thursday to establish the design and construction plan. "We're going to draw the whole thing but bid it in an additive alternative," Poster said. That means he will get a separate price for the facade on Stone Avenue south of the tower at the Pennington Street corner. Poster is uncertain whether the $780,000 is enough for the complete facade and he intends to hold off on the Stone Avenue section of the store if money runs out. "Pennington had the main entrance (to Ward) and is (the facade) longer," Poster said. "If we really get lucky, we could do the whole thing."

Poster Frost has about a 20 percent headstart because the firm also did a May 2004 historic feasibility study on the restoration of the entire Walgreens building and a February 2005 schematic design report. That is the first phase of designing the interior for a potential user. Poster believes enough 1929 design elements remain intact underneath the 1956 skin that damaged features could be recast. "This will be an extensive restoration," he said. "Here we're missing a fair amount, but we're not trying to guess what's there."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #725  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2008, 9:59 PM
kaneui kaneui is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,561
Reflecting the cancellation of numerous flights, TIA's September traffic reported the lowest monthly figures in nearly four years, after March had the highest monthly traffic ever:


Tucson airport's traffic off 12.5%
ARIZONA DAILY STAR
October 18, 2008

Passenger traffic at Tucson International Airport approached a five-year low in September, continuing a precipitous drop that started after July, when the total of passengers getting on and off planes at TIA was just below the five-year high. In September, 287,577 people got on and off planes at TIA, a 12.5 percent drop from one year ago, according to the monthly report from the Tucson Airport Authority. That's nearly as low as the lowest month in 2004, September.

Monthly passenger traffic had been building steadily since 2004 until June, when the totals dropped below last year's figures for the month, and have continued to slide, thanks to the closure of one airline, ExpressJet, the cancellation of several other daily flights, and the increasing price of airline tickets. Commercial flights were down almost 9 percent in September compared with the same month last year.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #726  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2008, 8:26 PM
kaneui kaneui is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,561
City preparing for bond issues for downtown projects
by TEYA VITU
Tucson Citizen
10.16.2008

City leaders will find out next week how Tucson rates for the first in a series of bonds to pay for a wide array of downtown projects. The worldwide financial crisis doesn't shut off the faucet for Tucson, but higher interest rates and other requirements may lead the city to bond for less than the $73.135 million targeted for the Series 2008 bond.

City Manager Mike Hein said it's a misconception that you can't get bonds. "The issue is not accesses to capital. The issue is projected revenue stream,'' he said. Hein will meet Oct. 23 in San Francisco with the three leading credit rating services to get a sense of where Tucson stands for the first of a projected six bonds to be issued through 2014 for a combined $453 million to fund a number of Rio Nuevo projects. Hein will meet with Moody's Investors Service, Standard & Poor's and Fitch Ratings. He will be accompanied by Frank Abeyta, the city's interim finance director, and Shawn Dralle, a financial adviser at RBC Capital Markets.

The Tucson team will back up its bond rating request with Dralle's comprehensive capital funding plan, which projects that the Rio Nuevo tax increment financing will produce $650 million in sales tax revenue through 2025, said Jaret Barr, Hein's assistant. Barr said that earlier this year, Tucson got an A-plus credit rating for Rio Nuevo bonding in a rating system that ranks AAA, AA, A, BBB, BB, B, CCC, CC, C and D. A-plus is considered low risk, according to investopedia.com, a Forbes Web site. "The biggest thing now, it's not about the rating," Barr said. "The biggest thing now is credit. If you have to hold more in reserve, that could be problematic."

Barr said standard policy is to hold 25 percent of a bond in reserve to assure bond payments. He said it is unknown whether substantially more of the bond will have to be held in reserve. Barr said the city may be ready to issue a bond by the end of the year. "I would assume if things stay the way they are, we are not going to go out for as much (bonding)," Barr said. "We would see what we absolutely will do in the next six months or so."

The only projects firmly in place for Series 2008 bond funding are $13.6 million for the Depot Plaza underground garage under construction behind Hotel Congress; $7 million for the first phase of the downtown infrastructure project on Congress Street, Broadway and South Granada Avenue; and $3.635 million to refund the Fox Theatre bond, Barr said. The Series 2008 bond also targets $48.9 million in Rio Nuevo projects at Tucson Origins on the West Side, the two most substantial being $10 million for a Cushing Street bridge over the Santa Cruz River and $17.3 million for an underground garage. Barr said they could be funded with the 2009 bond. The city also intends to issue bonds for $112.5 million in 2009, for $80 million and $11 million in 2010 and for $64 million and $113.3 million in 2014.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #727  
Old Posted Oct 28, 2008, 4:26 AM
kaneui kaneui is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,561
Tucson multiplex boom goes on: New theaters opening this week
By Phil Villarreal
ARIZONA DAILY STAR
10.27.2008

Continuing a multiplex boom in the Tucson area that started last December, Cinemark will open a new 12-screen theater in Oro Valley this week. Century Theatres at the Oro Valley Marketplace, at 12155 N. Oracle Road, officially debuts Friday. The Marketplace features stadium seating, a self-service concession stand and 48-inch-wide aisles, similar to Cinemark’s El Con and Park Place theaters. “It’s our first theater in Oro Valley and we’re so very excited, not only because it’s in Oro Valley but because it’s such a neat development,” Cinemark vice president of marketing James Meredith said. “I don’t think I’d say it’s an underserved market, but there’s clearly demand for a theater in Oro Valley,” he said.

Meredith said Cinemark plans to make the theater something of an arthouse destination, much like the Century El Con 20. As long as the market supports it, he said, it will play smaller-budget, indie-style films such as “The Duchess” and “Pride and Glory.” Demand will also help determine whether it eventually joins Cinemark’s other Tucson properties in broadcasting the live HD simulcasts of the New York Metropolitan Opera, company officials said. The Plano, Texas-based Cinemark operates more than 400 theaters in 38 states and as well as Mexico and South America.

The Marketplace is the third first-run theater to open in the Tucson area in last 11 months. The 12-screen Tower Theatres opened near Continental Ranch in Marana last December and the Harkins Spectrum 18 followed in May near Interstate 19 and West Irvington Road on Tucson’s South Side. Before that, the last first-run multiplex to open was the Century Park Place 20 in 2001.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #728  
Old Posted Oct 28, 2008, 4:38 AM
kaneui kaneui is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,561
Since there isn't much under construction of any height at the moment, it might be interesting to examine more of Tucson's historic structures that reflect the city's history and flavor:



El Con Water Tower saved by community efforts
10/27/2008 06:00 PM
Elaine Raines
Arizona Daily Star

It took a lot of local supporters and a 1955 Buick station wagon to save the historic El Con Water Tower from the wrecking ball in 1978. But that wasn’t the first time, nor would it be the last, that the old tower’s existence was threatened.



1991 Star photo
The El Con Water Tower



Built in 1929, the tower, near Randolph Way and East Broadway, provided water for the long-gone El Conquistador Hotel. It has been called “the last remnant of the first organized effort to bring tourists here.”

When it was built, the 50,000 gallon tank was surrounded by steel girders. Neighbors complained about its appearance, so the stucco facade, stained glass windows and weather vane were added. The city took ownership of the tower in 1944.

In 1975, having weathered previous attempts to tear it down, the six-story tower was threatened by the city. Clay tiles had fallen off and damaged nearby apartments. Instead of demolition, the city decided to spend about $2,000 for repairs and hoped that a buyer for the property could be found. It was used only for storage by that time.



1978 Star photo
Workers carry off the tower weather vane.



During a storm in 1978, the bearings for the 75-pound weather vane were damaged and for safety reasons it was taken down. Neighbors began a petition drive to restore the Joesler-designed prospector and burro to their lofty perch. It was the spindle of a 1955 Buick station wagon that came to the rescue of the sculpture and the old weather vane turned once again.



1978 Star photo
The restored miner and burro are back on top.



In 1980, the El Con Water Tower was listed on the National Register of Historic Places. It was designated an official city landmark in 1991.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #729  
Old Posted Oct 29, 2008, 4:17 AM
Rive85's Avatar
Rive85 Rive85 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 43
cool. ive seen that thing there all my life and i didnt know what it was...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #730  
Old Posted Nov 6, 2008, 7:54 AM
kaneui kaneui is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,561
Some recent museum developments--a possible permanent downtown home for the Museum of Contemporary Art Tucson, and an architect for the new $80M Arizona Historical Society Museum to be built west of I-10:


Museum might take over Fire Department site
Current fire headquarters will be vacated in 2009

by TEYA VITU
Tucson Citizen
11.05.2008

The Museum of Contemporary Art Tucson is looking at moving into the Tucson Fire Department headquarters downtown after TFD moves out next fall. The vagabond museum is the only entity showing interest in the city's request for proposals on the building at 265 S. Church Ave., said Tim Murphy, special projects coordinator of the Real Estate Division. MOCA officials toured the building Oct. 28, the only scheduled tour before proposals are due Dec. 4. "It's the right kind of space for us," said Randi Dorman, president of MOCA's board of directors. "It's the right size, right location and right configuration." The two-story, 19,289-square-foot TFD headquarters was built in 1971. In September 2009, the Tucson Fire Department plans to move into a 62,000-square-foot structure under construction near Cushing Street and Granada Avenue.

The current fire station was initially destined for use by the Tucson Police Department, which shares the block with TFD, but the city decided to field other proposals after building a crime lab on Miracle Mile instead of at police headquarters. The leasing party would have to accept the building "as-is," despite acknowledged problems, including a lack of parking. "We would like to use it as part of our headquarter expansion," police Capt. George Stoner said. But TPD has made no move to submit a proposal.

Councilwoman Nina Trasoff, whose ward contains the Fire Department headquarters, favors finding a public use for the building to bring activity to that corner as the city is in the process of renovating the Tucson Convention Center and building an arena across the street. The call for bids limits the lease to five years and allows the city to terminate it with one year's notice. "The five years give whoever comes in enough time to really make a go at it," Trasoff said. "And it gives the city enough time to find a (permanent) use for it." MOCA is looking for a permanent facility, either by constructing one or acquiring a building. "We could probably do five-year planning," Dorman said. "It would be a great next step for us."

MOCA was established in 1997 but has never had a full-fledged home. It has relied on tenuous leases at city-owned or city-managed buildings. The museum's most high-profile location since February has been on the Plaza inside the city-owned building at 149 E. Stone Ave., where MOCA's temporary right of entry expires at year's end. MOCA has leased city warehouse space at 191-197 E. Toole Ave. for $550 a month since 1997. Its office is there, but fire code violations have prohibited exhibitions since June 2006. MOCA moved exhibitions across the street in February 2007 to 174 E. Toole into what is called concept : moca, where the museum's artists in residence work.




Architect chosen for Historical Society's Rio Nuevo museum
By Tom Beal
ARIZONA DAILY STAR
10.31.2008

The Arizona Historical Society has selected an architect for its museum at Rio Nuevo. The museum, expected to cost up to $80 million to build and equip, will be designed by the Denver firm of Fentress Architects. Fentress designed the passenger terminal for Denver International Airport, whose roof is a series of white tepee-shaped structures meant to reflect the terminal's Rocky Mountains backdrop. The firm also was the architect for the National Museum of the Marine Corps at Quantico, Va., whose soaring steel and glass roof ends in a 210-foot mast and geometrically mirrors the iconic World War II photograph of five Marines and a Navy corpsman raising the American flag on Iwo Jima.

No design has yet been chosen for the Historical Society Museum, said Historical Society CEO Bill Ponder. The museum will sit west of the dry Santa Cruz River, south of Congress Street, on land that was the site of Tucson's first European buildings at the Mission San Agustín. It will be part of a complex of cultural attractions being built as part of the city's Rio Nuevo project, and the city has set aside $50 million in tax-increment bonds for it. It is expected to take a year, with groundbreaking set for the fourth quarter of 2009. It will take about 22 months to build, said Ponder. The Historical Society wants to open its museum in advance of Arizona's Centennial, Feb. 14, 2012. Other attractions planned for the site include a building to house the University of Arizona's Science Center and Arizona State Museum and a series of reconstructions of the original mission buildings.

The Historical Society's museum will replace its present Arizona History Museum at 949 E. Second St., adjacent to the UA campus. Fundraising and the sale of that valuable property will help offset the cost not covered by the city, said Ponder. In addition to its exhibits, archives and meeting rooms, the museum will host an "e" library with computer terminals, run by the Pima County Public Library system, Ponder said. Matt Popowski, of Fentress Architects, said his firm will work to match the building to its site. "In whatever place we go to, we really take the culture, history and landscape into consideration and work with the local architect and the client to understand what it is that they want to represent in the museum." Breckenridge Group Architects/Planners of Tucson will be associate architect on the project.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #731  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2008, 7:47 PM
kaneui kaneui is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,561
Although the most recent commercial leases show businesses leaving downtown, the completion of the streetcar line and perhaps the TCC expansion and hotel could hopefully ignite demand for tenants to fill this potential twin of the UniSource tower:



(render: Tucson Citizen)


Second Unisource Tower still possible
Developer sees potential demand for 100,000 square feet

by TEYA VITU
Tucson Citizen
11.10.2008

Downtown Tucson was supposed to have its own twin towers when the UniSource Tower, 1 S. Church Ave., was built in 1986. What remains Tucson's tallest building at 22 stories also remains the last skyscraper built here. Tucson was in the habit of building one or two of what now are the city's tallest buildings every decade from the 1950s to the 1980s. A conceptual drawing was made for a second UniSource Tower that could have continued the streak into the 1990s, but any work on a second tower stopped underground. "The core of the building infrastructure is in place for a second building," said Buzz Isaacson, who has been the building's broker and leasing agent since 1988.

The 20-foot-high stub with the "build to suit" signs southeast of the existing tower is filled with an elevator shaft, footings and entire foundation extending three stories down for construction of a second 22-story building, Isaacson said. Isaacson posted a new "build to suit" sign recently after giving up his independent real estate company to become a senior vice president at CB Richard Ellis. He said interest in a second tower is "pretty quiet right now," but he sees potential demand. "Tucson is a growing community," he said. "I don't think there is anyone who will say nobody will ever build a building downtown. It's a matter of timing."

He just looks at his client list in the UniSource for tenants that will eventually warrant a second tower. They include UniSource Energy/Tucson Electric Power, and the law firms Snell & Wilmer, Lewis and Rocca and Fennemore Craig. "As those tenants continue to grow, that will trigger demand for a second tower," he said. The infrastructure is in place for 200,000 additional square feet, which nearly matches the 233,000 square feet in the UniSource Tower, but Isaacson believes a second tower will likely be built at around 100,000 square feet. "If a 50,000-square-foot tenant came along, that would trigger a 100,000-square-foot tower," he said. "It's whatever the market pushes it toward. It doesn't have to be 200,000."

Isaacson estimates building a new tower would cost about $300 per square foot, including interior finishes, or about $60 million. The second tower never came about because the mid-1980s brought together the move to the suburbs for new office structures, such as Williams Centre, compounded with the savings and loan crisis and resulting major real estate downturn. Reliance Development Group of New York and Venture West of Tucson built the UniSource Tower, but Isaacson has since sold it twice, the last time to its current owner Hub Properties Trust of Newton, Mass.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #732  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2008, 8:03 PM
kaneui kaneui is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,561
Forget Rio Nuevo--the new "go-to" guy for revitalizing downtown is Glenn Lyons, whose vision and recent efforts as head of the Downtown Tucson Partnership are slowly beginning to transform the city center:


Public, private sectors work on setting downtown priorities
by TEYA VITU
Tucson Citizen
11.11.2008

Business and downtown revitalization plans are in the works to give the Downtown Tucson Partnership clear priorities for the private sector to collaborate with government. The two plans will work in conjunction to establish projects, figure out how to staff partnership efforts, and how to pay for them, said Glenn Lyons, the partnership's chief executive. The planning comes as potential projects and collaborations come into play at the same time the partnership's budget has decreased from $1.4 million to $1 million with cuts in city and expected Pima County funding. "There are 100 things we can do, but only 10 we can focus on and do well," Lyons said. "We have to decide where we should put those efforts."

Lyons is exploring adding more fee-for-service projects to boost revenue. The partnership is expected to get $50,000 to manage the city's ParkWise division, if the City Council decides to transfer the parking operation that involves garages and parking meters. Lyons' work with the city to sell the city-owned MacArthur Building, 345 E. Toole Ave., was a test run for the partnership, but Lyons thinks future collaborations of that nature should be done as fee for service.

Lyons expects to bring a partial business plan to the partnership's executive committee in December, with a partial revitalization plan to follow in February. The partnership's board of directors should get full drafts of the business plan in January and the revitalization plan in March. Lyons wants to have a town hall for public input in March or April. "I think the public and private sector will have a much better idea what it will take to revitalize downtown in all areas," Lyons said. "We will have identified the stumbling blocks for private investment and work to remove those."

Lyons stresses his revitalization planning goes beyond the city's Rio Nuevo projects and focuses on private sector investment downtown. "Private sector investment comes on top of Rio Nuevo spending," he said. "The city hasn't focused on that, per se. I want to work with the private sector to acquire land and help them get projects approved."

Lyons said the partnership has evolved this year beyond its duties to do maintenance, provide security and put on events, the things done by its predecessor, the Tucson Downtown Alliance. The new economic development arm so far includes such actions as selling the former Walgreens building, 44 N. Stone Ave., and finding a new developer for Presidio Terrace, 301 W. Paseo Redondo. That evolution has also included leading the city's downtown facade renovation program. Lyons has gotten directly involved with the Tucson Convention Center expansion and new arena project to make sure private sector opportunities are addressed for retail and entertainment options. "We're slowly taking on a more proactive role," he said.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #733  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2008, 8:05 PM
PHX31's Avatar
PHX31 PHX31 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: PHX
Posts: 7,174
There is only 233,000 ft^2 in that tower? It seems like a city's tallest would have more, not to mention it doesn't seem possible... but it must have a small footprint.

They should build something different, I'm not a fan of twins.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #734  
Old Posted Nov 12, 2008, 4:33 AM
Rive85's Avatar
Rive85 Rive85 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 43
whats that other building across the street suppose to be?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #735  
Old Posted Nov 12, 2008, 2:12 PM
somethingfast's Avatar
somethingfast somethingfast is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: In A Van Down By The River
Posts: 787
I remember seeing that rendering back in 1986 when I was in the 8th grade. Man, I seriously don't think we'll ever see another office high-rise in Tucson get built. The economics aren't there. At least not anytime soon. Btw, I thought UniSource was 23 stories. I've even counted them in person and it appears to be 23 unless the top floor is mechanical. Nice little tower really.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #736  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2008, 12:07 AM
aznate27's Avatar
aznate27 aznate27 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 242
I just checked the Emporis building site. It shows the Unisource Tower at 23 stories.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #737  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2008, 2:45 PM
somethingfast's Avatar
somethingfast somethingfast is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: In A Van Down By The River
Posts: 787
that's what i thought...proves my awesome visual counting skills
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #738  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2008, 10:41 PM
kaneui kaneui is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,561
Southwest Contractor gives a progress update on numerous metro area projects--nothing really new here, but lots of construction details.

(*Interesting to note that Rafael Vinoly is still listed as architect for the new UofA Science Center/Arizona State Museum--not a bad gig since he's already received millions for designing the Rainbow Bridge fantasy.)




Crews have excavated 130,000 cu yds of dirt at a former
landfill to make way for Tucson Origins Heritage Park.
(photo by Lloyd Construction Co.)



The University Medical Center’s new six-story patient tower
includes a new emergency department and children’s hospital.
(photo courtesy Kitchell)



Old Tucson Becoming New Again

Tucson Activity Report
While Tucson is feeling the economic pinch as much as the rest of the region, there are still a healthy number of projects, mostly related to the Rio Nuevo downtown revitalization or the University of Arizona.

By Alan M. Petrillo
Southwest Contractor
November, 2008

One of the longest anticipated projects in Tucson is beginning to show activity, although no steel has risen yet. The Tucson Origins Heritage Park, part of the Rio Nuevo project to revitalize downtown Tucson and the surrounding area, is a $55 million project that will recreate the historic Mission San Agustin Complex and Mission Garden. Located at the base of “A” Mountain, it will become a historical park with outdoor gathering spaces for events and performances. The 34-acre project includes a three-story underground parking garage that has now been excavated. Steel and concrete work is planned to begin in March. The entire site sits on a former landfill.

“Last June we began excavating 130,000 cu yds of dirt,” says Jeff Dupuis, field project manager for construction-manager-at-risk Lloyd Construction of Tucson. “Then we had to bury 7 mi of 1-in. high-density polyethylene piping for HVAC before we backfilled the excavation.” Dupuis says he expects Lloyd will perform more landfill removal before it begins construction on the mission complex, a walled compound that will house a chapel and two-story Convento building. The rectangular former convent was originally built in 1770 but fell into ruin in the 1880’s until it was later demolished.

The project is pursuing a LEED silver certification. In addition to the complex itself, a 30-acre park will sit atop the underground garage and tie in all the public structures at the site. The overall design firm is Burns Wald-Hopkins Shambach Architects of Tucson, while the garage is designed by Overland Partners Architects of San Antonio. Excavation work is being performed by Granite Construction of Tucson.


Diamonds Are Forever
University Medical Center’s new emergency department, patient tower addition and Diamond Children’s Medical Center are part of a six-story project at the University of Arizona. The new 61-bed emergency department on the first floor will have a seven-bed trauma unit as well as a 16-bed clinical decision unit and 61 emergency beds. The second and third floors will be dedicated to two 20-bed intensive care units and two 24-bed medical/surgical units, primarily designed to serve patients coming from the emergency department. Scheduled completion is August for the first three floors.

The Diamond Children’s Medical Center will occupy floors four through six and is expected to be completed by January 2010. It will feature 36 intensive care beds, 36 medical-surgical beds, 20-room pediatric intensive care unit, 12-room hematology-oncology unit and six-room bone marrow transplant unit. The center will have its own entrance and a 24/7 pediatric emergency room. A two-spot heliport will be on top of the structure.

Bud Bedingfield, project manager for general contractor Kitchell Contractors of Phoenix, says the first year of the project entailed prep work to clear the building footprint and relocate communication systems, as well as the existing heliport. Extensive underground utility work was required to relocate three emergency generators under the existing heliport, says Kitchell project director Pat Watson. He says they also had to build a new chilled water facility in the basement of the existing hospital, set up a temporary helipad while the other was being dismantled and provide a temporary access ramp for ambulances. The project totals 218,509 sq ft. Cost of the entire project is $116 million.


When Doves Fly
Another anticipated project is the Ritz-Carlton, Dove Mountain Hotel, with an expected construction cost of $276 million. Fred Bullington, project manager for general contractor T. L. Roof & Associates of Tucson, says the hotel is the biggest project his firm has tackled in Arizona with a total of 250 rooms - 225 in the main hotel and 25 others in nine detached wood-frame casitas. The four-story main hotel uses concrete columns with post-tension decks, adobe block, straw-flecked stucco, native stone and clay tile roofs to give it a Southwest flavor, Bullington says. The hotel features two ballrooms, outdoor venues, three restaurants and a 17,000-sq ft spa and fitness center. It also has a $60 million Jack Nicklaus-designed golf club with 27-hole golf course planned to complete in late 2008. A $220 million residential component of 91 single-family homes also is planned.

Bullington says the hotel topped out at the end of June a couple of weeks ahead of schedule, and he expects to be substantially completed by August, even though T. L. Roof has some experienced permitting problems. “Of the nine casita buildings, three of them still aren’t permitted, and neither is the grill building next to the main pool,” he says, “and they’re redesigning the front end of the spa. Modifications to the design is one of the reasons we don’t have some permits.”


UA Report
The University of Arizona has been active this year and even won an award from the National Wildlife Federation for sustainability and education in its academics and operations. Probably the biggest project planned by the university is its Science Center, scheduled to be built on the west side of Interstate 10 and serve as an anchor for Tucson’s Rio Nuevo Cultural Plaza. “We expect to be first out of the box to build for that area,” says Peter Dourlein, associate director of facilities design and construction for the university. “Our goal is to be completed by the end of 2011 to tie in with the completion of the modern streetcar, which will pass right by our building.” Dourlein says the $130 million budget also includes construction of a new Arizona State Museum. “It’s an interesting concept of how the two overlap for science of the past and future,” he says. “Their programs will be joined physically in the building and also educationally through collaboration. The Science Center is expected to occupy 127,000 sq ft and the Arizona State Museum 76,000 sq ft. Architect is Rafael Vinoly Architects of New York; construction manager at risk is Turner Construction of Tempe.

Another university project is the Student Recreation Center, which is due for occupancy in November 2009 and is on track to earn LEED silver. “We have a pretty large glass façade along the north exposure on Sixth Street that brings a lot of natural light into the building,” Dourlein says, “and we’re also using some translucent walls. The east and west sides have limited numbers of windows.” He adds that the 53,000-sq-ft building uses daylight-sensing controls and features recycled rubber sports floor and recycled fiber carpets. Sundt Construction of Tucson is the general contractor and the architect-engineer is M3 Engineering & Technology Corp. of Tucson. The university also is constructing an indoor practice facility that includes a new diving well and gymnastics training facility, scheduled for completion by the end of October. The main floor of the practice facility is depressed 17 ft in the ground to lower the mass of the building, which needs high ceilings for basketball, Dourlein says. “It’s a better visual effect and also helps insulate the building because part of it is blanketed by the earth,” he adds. The diving well, a separate pool only used for diving, is 30 meters long, 25 meters wide and 17 ft deep.

Recently completed was the $22 million Norton School of Family and Consumer Sciences Building, renamed McClelland Park. Hensel Phelps’ Tucson office was general contractor. “The facility is conceived as an icon for the program, reflecting its multicultural identity and diversity as a welcoming place for families, businesses, community members, faculty and students,” says Mark Kranz, AIA, design principal with architect SmithGroup of Phoenix. Comprised of a mixture of aluminum, stainless steel, brick, wood, concrete and glass, the building’s interior uses are equally as multi-faceted with classrooms, lecture halls, retail-like space and even residences for faculty and staff. The exterior features a ramada screened by a steel shade structure that is illuminated at night with a colored LED lighting system.


High-Tech in Oro Valley
The Sanofi-Aventis Tucson Research Center in Oro Valley, a new 110,000-sq-ft research laboratory with space for chemistry and biology labs and regional operations corporate offices, is targeting LEED silver, says Robert Mitchell, project manager for the Phoenix office of DPR Construction Inc., the project’s general contractor. Mitchell expects to get LEED points for energy and water efficiency, use of 10% recycled materials on interior finishes, construction waste diversion and stormwater management. “The architect specified high recycled content, from countertops to flooring, as well as the steel,” Mitchell says.

The $49.1 million structure features two stories over a 21-ft-deep basement under half the building’s footprint. The public façade on the west side is clad in red sandstone imported from India that is mechanically attached with open joints. The back façade is interlocked metal panels. The project is scheduled for on-time completion in June despite delays early on caused by permitting and heavy monsoon rains. Kling Stubbins of Philadelphia is responsible for the mechanical and structural engineering, while the WLB Group of Tucson is handling the civil and landscape engineering.


Fullfillment is on Target
On Tucson’s southeast side, Target Corp. is building a 975,000-sq-ft fulfillment center for its online business. The facility will have automated conveyors, merchandise handling equipment and storage racks, as well as 50,000 sq ft of office space and a 20,000-sq-ft gift-wrapping space. Located in the Interstate Commerce Park, the site covers 133 acres, of which 100 acres are set aside for Target’s fulfillment center. The remaining acreage is reserved for future development. General contractor for the project is Archer Western Contractors of Phoenix.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #739  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2008, 3:50 AM
kaneui kaneui is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,561
It's looking like the beginning of the end of MLB spring training in Tucson unless the county can lure a replacement team from the Grapefruit League:



Tucson Electric Park
(photo: Tucson Citizen)


County looks at $5 million buyout pitch from White Sox
GARRY DUFFY
Tucson Citizen
11.15.2008

The Chicago White Sox are leaving Tucson to train in Glendale in 2009, a team official said Friday. How much it will cost the team to break its lease will be discussed by the Pima County Board of Supervisors on Tuesday. One option in the team's proposal lets it pay the county $5 million and continue efforts to find a replacement Major League Baseball team for spring training at Tucson Electric Park. "It's probably the best financial arrangement for the county," Pima County Administrator Chuck Huckelberry said Friday. The White Sox want to move to a new $82 million spring training facility in Glendale that will be shared with the Los Angeles Dodgers. The White Sox share TEP during spring training with the Arizona Diamondbacks.

The proposal gives the county 180 days to decide whether to take the $5 million and have the White Sox keep looking for a replacement through 2016, or have the team get Major League Baseball to open a youth baseball academy at the complex. Under that option, the White Sox would have to fund the operation and any improvements needed at the sports complex, Huckelberry said.

The proposal was discussed Friday by the Pima County Sports and Tourism Authority, whose members represent businesses that benefit from the presence of spring training in Tucson. Authority members will make a recommendation to the supervisors at the Tuesday meeting, said Authority Chairman Tom Tracy. The county could try to hold the White Sox to the contract requiring them to stay at TEP through 2012, but that likely would result in litigation that would eventually yield far less than the proposed buyout, Huckelberry said. A White Sox study earlier this year said the county could turn TEP into a national youth and amateur sports tournament destination that would pump $42 million a year into the local economy. The team will continue to lobby MLB officials for a youth baseball academy , said spokesman Scott Reifert.

Supervisor Ray Carroll said Friday the chance of another MLB team relocating to TEP is virtually nil. "There are no other teams looking to move," he said. The departure of the White Sox could leave Tucson with no spring training teams. The county's contract with the Diamondbacks allows the team to break its lease if there are fewer than three MLB teams here for spring training. The city of Tucson's contract with the Colorado Rockies at Hi Corbett Field has the same provision.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #740  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2008, 10:32 AM
kaneui kaneui is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,561
It's now official: the White Sox will be doing their spring training in Glendale...and the D-backs and Rockies could also leave within a few years. (And the feasibility studies say Tucson can support a minor-league hockey franchise to fill a new downtown arena? Hmmm...if history is any indication, launching a pro sports team in this town will be tough going, for a number of reasons.)


County accepts $5M for Sox departure; D-backs could be next to leave
by GARRY DUFFY
Tucson Citizen
11.19.2008

It didn't take long for another cleat to drop regarding the future of spring training in Tucson. Hours after the Pima County Board of Supervisors voted to accept a $5 million buyout to let the Chicago White Sox out of the team's lease at Tucson Electric Park, officials of the Arizona Diamondbacks confirmed the team is entertaining offers to move its spring training operations out of Tucson Electric Park and closer to Phoenix, as well. "We would rather just stay there," Diamondbacks president Derrick Hall said Tuesday. "But there has to be more than two teams. That's our issue."

The Diamondbacks and Colorado Rockies, who train at Hi Corbett Field in Tucson, both have stipulations in their contracts with the county and city that there be at least three teams in the area for spring training. Both teams can use the departure of the White Sox, and any future failure to draw a third Major League Baseball team to replace the White Sox, as breaches of their contracts binding them to remain here for spring training through 2012 and 2011, respectively. Hall said the Diamondbacks will conduct spring training in Tucson this coming Cactus League season, and likely at least until the team's contract with the county to use TEP at least through 2012. "You would comfortably need at least two to three years to build a stadium and facilities," Hall said. Hall added a replacement team might not be enough ultimately keep the Diamondbacks at TEP. "We need four teams," Hall said.

County officials Tuesday accepted the White Sox buyout offer to leave TEP before the team's lease expires in 2012 to play at a new facility in Glendale, with a combination of anger and resignation. "It's a really sad day for baseball here in Tucson," Board Chairman Richard Elías said before the supervisors' 5-0 vote to accept the White Sox's offer. Though the deal negates the contract bonding it here through 2012, the Sox still will be required to search for a replacement MLB spring training team for Tucson Electric Park through 2026.

An alternative proposal rejected by the supervisors would have had the White Sox help establish and fund a youth and amateur sports tournament facility at TEP, including a MLB-affiliated Baseball Academy focusing on programs for at-risk kids in the community. Supervisors reserved irate comments not so much for the White Sox but for communities up north, which used revenues generated by the Arizona Sports and Tourism Authority to build new lavish facilities to lure MLB teams not only from Tucson but Florida as well. The Phoenix-area sports authority was created by the Legislature in 2000 as a financing mechanism to build the National Football League Arizona Cardinals' stadium that opened this year in Glendale. "It was never the intent of the Legislature for the sports authority to be abused the way Phoenix and Glendale abused it," said Supervisor Ramón Valadez, whose district contains TEP.

After the Cardinals' stadium was completed, the Arizona Sports and Tourism Authority continued to raise and use tax revenues to build new spring training facilities in such communities as Glendale and Goodyear. Elías termed the actions of the Maricopa County communities to take spring training teams from other cities in the state - namely Tucson - as "cannibalism." The Rockies already are exploring a move out of Hi Corbett Field. Team officials want the city to spend at least $10 million to upgrade the facility, located in Randolph Park. City officials, in the middle of a budget crisis that has included hiring and salary freezes, say they don't have the money. Rockies officials have spoken with officials of the town of Marana about occupying a possible new spring training and sports complex there. But plans for such a facility have not been drawn and a funding source source has not been identified.

County Administrator Chuck Huckelberry said Tuesday afternoon that county officials and members of the Pima County Sports and Tourism Authority have heard rumblings that the Diamondbacks could look elsewhere if the White Sox were to pack up. 'It's no surprise," Huckelberry said. "Chandler - that's where we've heard," Huckelberry said. The Diamondbacks' Hall said one possibility could have the team partner with the Rockies at a new spring training complex closer to Phoenix. But Hall also said that talks also are ongoing with a private developer to build a new facility in or near Tucson for the Diamondbacks. At Tuesday's supervisors meeting, supervisors were told that local private businesses and amateur athletic agencies could help develop and operate youth facilities that could develop into a major tournament destination site on a regional or national level. "Whatever the price of buying out the contract, the money should be used for youth sports," Jim Tiggas, who represents the Amateur Athletics Union, the oldest amateur youth sports advocacy organization in the United States. Softball and baseball tournaments could be housed at TEP and draw large audiences, Tiggas said.

Hotel, restaurant, rental car, and other services in the area reap about $30 million annually from the teams, players, and fans each spring, hospitality industry officials estimate. The supervisors directed County Administrator Chuck Huckelberry to set aside $500,000 for the Pima County Sports and Tourism Authority over the next two years to develop youth and amateur sports programs - and also for travel and promotional activities to try to bring a different MLB team to TEP for spring training to offset the loss of the White Sox. Huckelberry had recommended accepting the buyout because the TEP-White Sox lease was marginally profitable - bringing the county income of about about $500,000 from the team each spring. Though $5 million was increased over the Sox's earlier offer of $4 million, Huckelberry said the buyout probably would not have gone higher.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southwest
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:09 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.