HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive


    Abraj Al Bait in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Mecca Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location

 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2007, 4:00 AM
DUBAI2015's Avatar
DUBAI2015 DUBAI2015 is offline
Yippie Ka Yay!
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Medford Oregon, US of A
Posts: 514
MECCA | Abraj Al-Bait | 601m | 1972ft | 95 fl | T/O

The Abraj Al Bait Towers is a building complex under construction (Completion 2008) in Mecca, Saudi Arabia. It will be the largest (not tallest) building in the world by mass, the tallest building in Saudi Arabia, and one of the tallest buildings in the world at 577 m.

The site of the structure is across the street from the entrance to the Masjid al Haram, which houses the Kaaba, the holiest site in Islam. As a result, the Abraj Al Bait Towers will have a large prayer room capable of holding nearly four thousand worshippers. It will contain a five-star hotel to help accommodate the over two million pilgrims who participate in hajj each year.

In addition, the Abraj Al Bait Towers will have a four-story shopping mall and a parking garage capable of holding over eight hundred vehicles. Residential towers will house permanent residents while two heliports and a conference center are to accommodate business travellers. In total, up to 65,000 people would be housed inside the Towers.

Previous Designs:

400m?

Old Design (2005):

485m.

Now Design (2007):

577m.





U/C picture from March



Enjoy!
__________________
Game Show question: Why do women rub their eyes when they first wake up?

Contestant's answer: Because they have no balls to scratch?
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2007, 4:47 AM
Rise To The Top Rise To The Top is offline
We can kiss the sky! - MC
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Las Vegas, NV/ Lincoln, NH
Posts: 572
577m?! Why did they decide to increase it?
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2007, 4:48 AM
Rise To The Top Rise To The Top is offline
We can kiss the sky! - MC
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Las Vegas, NV/ Lincoln, NH
Posts: 572
Also, the renders don't look like 577m, it looks more like 400ish.
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2007, 5:00 AM
JMininger JMininger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 320
That thing is massive. I understand the symbolism and, I guess, practicality, but that tower is not at all pleasing to the eye.
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2007, 5:07 AM
Rise To The Top Rise To The Top is offline
We can kiss the sky! - MC
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Las Vegas, NV/ Lincoln, NH
Posts: 572
Also, that angle is very annoying. You can only see like %20 of the complex. Hopefully updates will be from a roof top nearby.
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Feb 22, 2010, 5:45 AM
newyorkthing10's Avatar
newyorkthing10 newyorkthing10 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Modanville
Posts: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rise To The Top View Post
Also, the renders don't look like 577m, it looks more like 400ish.
The rendering looks like 350 and with the pinnacle it looks like 420
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Feb 23, 2010, 5:03 PM
OneWorldTradeCenter's Avatar
OneWorldTradeCenter OneWorldTradeCenter is offline
Editor
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Renningen, Germany
Posts: 1,201
Quote:
Originally Posted by newyorkthing10 View Post
The rendering looks like 350 and with the pinnacle it looks like 420
This height would be enough. 577m is too tall for this one.
__________________
One World Trade Center= the best skyscraper in the world and the tallest in the Western Hemisphere
All the way with LBJ
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted May 3, 2010, 2:57 AM
jamesinclair jamesinclair is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 865
"The hotel brands involved are Conrad, Westin, Sheraton, Marriott, Hilton, Radisson Blu, Mercure and Novotel. "


Ah yes, just what the holy location needed, a Sheraton.
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2007, 5:57 AM
Stephenapolis's Avatar
Stephenapolis Stephenapolis is offline
The True Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 8,573
I really do not like the clock being added. I understand why it is there, it just makes it look like an oversized BigBen imo. Otherwise no complaints from me.
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2007, 3:13 PM
ATLksuGUY's Avatar
ATLksuGUY ATLksuGUY is offline
FriskyDingo
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 565
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephenapolis View Post
I really do not like the clock being added. I understand why it is there, it just makes it look like an oversized BigBen imo. Otherwise no complaints from me.
We americans took London Bridge and now these people want Big Ben
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2013, 4:23 PM
The North One's Avatar
The North One The North One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,489
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATLksuGUY View Post
We americans took London Bridge and now these people want Big Ben
What are you even talking about?

Edit: I just realized I responded to a post from 2007.
__________________
Spawn of questionable parentage!
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2007, 4:03 PM
wong21fr's Avatar
wong21fr wong21fr is offline
Reluctant Hobbesian
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 13,149
I like it, though the clock face is out of place with the rest of the styling and needs a serious redo.

The mass of the complex is the most impressive part.
__________________
"You don't strike, you just go to work everyday and do your job real half-ass. That's the American way!" -Homer Simpson

All of us who are concerned for peace and triumph of reason and justice must be keenly aware how small an influence reason and honest good will exert upon events in the political field. ~Albert Einstein

     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2007, 4:53 PM
Bergenser's Avatar
Bergenser Bergenser is offline
Information Age
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Bergen, Norway
Posts: 2,890
I think the design looks much better now!
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2007, 5:02 PM
TheMeltyMan's Avatar
TheMeltyMan TheMeltyMan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,217
I like it. Too bad i'll never see it in person.

I can imagine there would be a great view from the Kaaba but ever visiting there is even less likely.
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2007, 7:51 PM
Dalton Dalton is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 398
It's almost Soviet in its clunkiness, especially the ludicrously overscaled clock tower. But surprisingly the actual construction photos make it look a little better than the renderings.

Between this and what Dubai is doing, I guess I'll never understand the Middle Eastern skyscraper aesthetic - or rather, the aesthetic values of the handful of oil sheiks who push these monstrous developments through with no democratic or governmental oversight and approval. It's almost as if the entire region were filled with Donald Trumps who have free reign to indulge their bad taste.
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2007, 9:35 PM
alphawolf alphawolf is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: les bois / Watertown / Ft. Drum
Posts: 706
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dalton View Post
It's almost Soviet in its clunkiness, especially the ludicrously overscaled clock tower.
Exactly what I was thinking. Just add a hammer & sickle.
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2007, 8:37 PM
tdawg's Avatar
tdawg tdawg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Astoria, NY
Posts: 2,935
that is the ugliest thing i've ever seen.
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2012, 8:27 PM
PhillyToNYC's Avatar
PhillyToNYC PhillyToNYC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 92
Quote:
Originally Posted by tdawg View Post
that is the ugliest thing i've ever seen.
This post on page one of this thread basically sums it up for me.
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2007, 10:46 PM
SD_Phil's Avatar
SD_Phil SD_Phil is offline
Heavy User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 2,720
Quote:
Originally Posted by DUBAI2015 View Post
In total, up to 65,000 people would be housed inside the Towers.
That is an astounding #!
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2007, 11:23 PM
Kngkyle Kngkyle is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,092
Ugly. The 2005 version was the best. 2004 version is the worst, but this latest version isn't far ahead. Not pleasing to look at, but suppose it serves its purpose.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:57 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.