HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2081  
Old Posted Oct 9, 2017, 10:43 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 14,832
Cicero/55th could be sunken below grade and the runway extended over it. The bigger problem is the RPZ, if you extended the runway you'd create hazards from the Orange Line viaduct and the freight tracks which are elevated. Plus the gains in length would be pretty modest.

If I had to expand Midway with godlike powers, I'd create a new north/south runway along Central from 55th down past 63rd and into the Clearing Yard as far as is feasible. A few blocks of houses would need to go, but comparatively little. You could possibly squeeze in an 8000' runway.

Either 63rd or 65th would have to go into an underpass beneath the new runway. Bundle this with a new overpass for Central over the Clearing Yards, which the Southwest Side has been requesting for decades to ease traffic on Cicero and Harlem.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2082  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2017, 1:11 AM
CanesFan CanesFan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
Cicero/55th could be sunken below grade and the runway extended over it. The bigger problem is the RPZ, if you extended the runway you'd create hazards from the Orange Line viaduct and the freight tracks which are elevated. Plus the gains in length would be pretty modest.

If I had to expand Midway with godlike powers, I'd create a new north/south runway along Central from 55th down past 63rd and into the Clearing Yard as far as is feasible. A few blocks of houses would need to go, but comparatively little. You could possibly squeeze in an 8000' runway.

Either 63rd or 65th would have to go into an underpass beneath the new runway. Bundle this with a new overpass for Central over the Clearing Yards, which the Southwest Side has been requesting for decades to ease traffic on Cicero and Harlem.
The problem with building a north/south runway at Midway is that it would interfere with O'Hare's traffic flow, particularly departures off of 22L at O'Hare. The new runway would likely have to be arrival only in a north flow and departure only in a south flow.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2083  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2017, 4:40 PM
denizen467 denizen467 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,212
^ How does ORD 22L interfere with a theoretical 18/36 at MDW - don't you mean ORD 14R? The latter is expected to be decommissioned in the next three years.


You could get nearly an extra 2000 feet out of 13C/31C at MDW if you depressed Cicero at 63rd and then bought up a whole neighborhood, before you'd further need to depress a set of freight tracks. Buying even more houses for a RPZ could be necessary though. This plan would gift the Bedford Park cluster of hotels a really good runway view (though nothing like Princess Juliana).

Doing an extension at the sw corner of the airport would be simpler, except it could need the cooperation of Bedford Park.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2084  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2017, 5:40 PM
jimjoe45 jimjoe45 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by denizen467 View Post
^ How does ORD 22L interfere with a theoretical 18/36 at MDW - don't you mean ORD 14R? The latter is expected to be decommissioned in the next three years.


You could get nearly an extra 2000 feet out of 13C/31C at MDW if you depressed Cicero at 63rd and then bought up a whole neighborhood, before you'd further need to depress a set of freight tracks. Buying even more houses for a RPZ could be necessary though. This plan would gift the Bedford Park cluster of hotels a really good runway view (though nothing like Princess Juliana).

Doing an extension at the sw corner of the airport would be simpler, except it could need the cooperation of Bedford Park.
How is this discussion still going on? MDW is, and has been, penned in by thousands of single family homes for decades. Any "options" being discussed here require an impossible amount of financial and political capital. If a carrier needs that sort of equipment they can use ORD's 10K and 13K ft runways 15 miles north.

We should be discussing the the $323M Modernization Program the city just began at Midway. Expanded security, parking garages, and restaurant options. New renderings and video were released last week and look great.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2085  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2017, 5:46 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is online now
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 23,567
^ yes. MDW runway extension discussion is a complete and total dead end.

as for the MDW modernization program, now we're talking! doubling TSA screening capacity is long overdue.

also, i think someone in this thread previously mentioned that a new and better connection between the CTA station and the terminal is part of the new work as well, which is also long overdue.
__________________
If a Pizza is baked in a forest, and no one is around to eat it, is it still delicious?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2086  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2017, 6:01 PM
CanesFan CanesFan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by denizen467 View Post
^ How does ORD 22L interfere with a theoretical 18/36 at MDW - don't you mean ORD 14R?
No, 22L actually. When ORD is in a west flow, Southbound and eastbound departures are typically conducted off of 22L. The O'HARE TWO DEPARTURE http://155.178.201.160/d-tpp/1710/00166OHARE.PDF has a climb gradient requiring aircraft to be at or above 3000 feet by 5 miles from the ORD VOR and above 4000 feet by eight miles from the ORD VOR. This is done to prevent conflicts with MDW traffic. If the prevailing winds are strong enough to require 31C arrivals at MDW, the southbound and eastbound departures out of ORD tend to backup. If MDW were to construct a theoretical 18-36, Runway 18 arrivals would necessitate a flight path slightly more northerly than the current 31C arrivals, thus impacting ORD's departure flow.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2087  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2017, 8:18 PM
k1052 k1052 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,946
I'm desperately hoping a Tortas Frontera makes it into MDW with the new concessions expansion. It would make flying Southwest, the times work requires it, that much less painful.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2088  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2017, 10:28 PM
Mister Uptempo's Avatar
Mister Uptempo Mister Uptempo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 206
You'll see the airlines using Gary before a single house gets torn down for a runway extension at Midway.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2089  
Old Posted Oct 11, 2017, 3:29 AM
N830MH N830MH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,493
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mister Uptempo View Post
You'll see the airlines using Gary before a single house gets torn down for a runway extension at Midway.
Absolutely!!! We will see what happen. You'll find out soon enough.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2090  
Old Posted Oct 11, 2017, 3:33 AM
the urban politician the urban politician is online now
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 20,012
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimjoe45 View Post
How is this discussion still going on? MDW is, and has been, penned in by thousands of single family homes for decades. Any "options" being discussed here require an impossible amount of financial and political capital. If a carrier needs that sort of equipment they can use ORD's 10K and 13K ft runways 15 miles north.

We should be discussing the the $323M Modernization Program the city just began at Midway. Expanded security, parking garages, and restaurant options. New renderings and video were released last week and look great.
$323 million seems like a shitload to spend for the improvements we seem to be getting
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2091  
Old Posted Oct 11, 2017, 3:34 AM
LaSalle.St.Station's Avatar
LaSalle.St.Station LaSalle.St.Station is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 335
Ive always thought that through the years Midway operations should aquire buffer land up to the railroad ring surrounding the airport as it became available. Not necessarily a prelude to expansion but at least positioning the airport for future design enhancements.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2092  
Old Posted Oct 11, 2017, 3:44 PM
IrishIllini IrishIllini is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,128
This may be totally wrong, but I feel expansions at Gary-Chicago are more feasible than expansions at Midway. Probably easier to make happen too. Land values in west Gary are probably a steal in comparison to the area around Midway. That bad news there is Illinois loses on any business related taxes associated with airport usage by airlines.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2093  
Old Posted Oct 11, 2017, 3:52 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 14,832
Gary just expanded their runway to handle larger jets. They can't get any airlines to serve them. NW Indiana is not a major business destination, the airport is too far from the Loop at 30 miles away, and Gary itself has a massive image problem. Just driving to the terminal requires passing blocks of abandoned truck stops and ruined strip malls.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2094  
Old Posted Oct 11, 2017, 4:29 PM
woodrow woodrow is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 813
Quote:
Originally Posted by k1052 View Post
I'm desperately hoping a Tortas Frontera makes it into MDW with the new concessions expansion. It would make flying Southwest, the times work requires it, that much less painful.
THIS^^^^
Omigosh. That would be a dream. Though I am enjoying Publican at O'Hare now.

Quote:
$323 million seems like a shitload to spend for the improvements we seem to be getting
I saw some other images that makes me think it is even bigger than what we see, plus the price includes major redo of the CTA connection to the terminal. Tearing down one of the spiral ramps, making corridor a straight shot, etc.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2095  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2017, 1:01 AM
kbud kbud is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 83
T5 Expansion Start Date

When is the Terminal 5 nine gate expansion going to start? Or won't this begin until the Terminal 2 project begins? The T5 expansion was announced in July 2016, almost 16 months ago now.

Will it solely be additional gates or will there be any additional baggage carousels or passport control lanes?

Last edited by kbud; Oct 19, 2017 at 12:48 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2096  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2017, 1:04 PM
k1052 k1052 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,946
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbud View Post
When is the Terminal 5 nine gate expansion going to start? Or won't this begin until the Terminal 2 project begins? The T5 expansion was announced in July 2016, almost 16 months ago now.

Will it solely be additional gates or will there be any additional baggage carousels or passport control lanes?
I thought CDA planned to award the contract by the end of this year and get started soon after. Since it looks like the plan is to shift Delta over to T5 this will need to be completed well before they start taking down T2. Plans may have been revised with the new framework so unsure if CBP/landside upgrades will still be part of the package.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2097  
Old Posted Oct 27, 2017, 12:29 AM
F1 Tommy's Avatar
F1 Tommy F1 Tommy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 896
Last United Airlines 747 flights from O'Hare this week. They have a special aircraft with 1970's style titles on it doing the flights.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2098  
Old Posted Oct 27, 2017, 3:08 AM
N830MH N830MH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,493
Quote:
Originally Posted by F1 Tommy View Post
Last United Airlines 747 flights from O'Hare this week. They have a special aircraft with 1970's style titles on it doing the flights.
Wow! I'll be damned. I'm very sad. They will miss the 747 aircraft. I actually flew on 747-400 for 3 times out of AMS-LAX, and LHR-PHX twice.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2099  
Old Posted Oct 27, 2017, 1:00 PM
k1052 k1052 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,946
Looks like the central deicing facility is coming along. They're grading the hell out of the west side dirt piles. Lots of concrete trucks and drainage pipe going in yesterday.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2100  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2017, 5:07 PM
Kngkyle Kngkyle is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chicago/New York
Posts: 2,585
Hainan to start 2x weekly service to Chengdu from O'Hare next summer.

I didn't see that one coming.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:50 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.