HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #581  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2019, 12:30 AM
Dr Awesomesauce's Avatar
Dr Awesomesauce Dr Awesomesauce is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: BEYOND THE OUTER RIM
Posts: 5,889
Quote:
Originally Posted by Laceoflight View Post
Love it.

Where did Little River go? Buried? I'm guessing that stream ran just outside the old city walls, yes?

It's a shame they didn't leave a small section of the walls standing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #582  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2019, 12:31 AM
vid's Avatar
vid vid is offline
I am a typical
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Thunder Bay
Posts: 41,172
Most streams got buried back then. I think this map or the one on historic maps shows a maps of Winnipeg and Toronto with all the creeks and streams that used to exist in those cities cores.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #583  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2019, 12:40 AM
PhilippeMtl's Avatar
PhilippeMtl PhilippeMtl is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Rosemont-la-petite-patrie, Montreal
Posts: 2,179
It still there. Hidden but alive.

http://undermontreal.com/riviere-st-...art-to-finish/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #584  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2019, 1:13 AM
Dr Awesomesauce's Avatar
Dr Awesomesauce Dr Awesomesauce is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: BEYOND THE OUTER RIM
Posts: 5,889
Ask and ye shall receive! Thanks!

And, yes, early maps of Hamilton, for example, show a very wet, boggy environment crisscrossed by streams, marshes, etc. We quickly redirected or drained those away so it was more habitable...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #585  
Old Posted Mar 31, 2019, 2:34 AM
ainvan ainvan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toronto/Vancouver
Posts: 965
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #586  
Old Posted Mar 31, 2019, 4:56 AM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
That just gave me a nerdgasm Thank you.
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #587  
Old Posted Mar 31, 2019, 12:11 PM
le calmar's Avatar
le calmar le calmar is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 5,035
Interesting, I always assumed the entire Lower Mainland was suitable for agriculture but based on this graphic the city of Vancouver is sitting on bedrock.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #588  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2019, 11:34 AM
FrAnKs's Avatar
FrAnKs FrAnKs is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ville de Québec / Quebec city
Posts: 5,682
PEI : 3

__________________
PROVINCE OF QUEBEC ==> 9 000 000
MONTREAL METRO ==> 4 550 000
QUEBEC CITY METRO ==> 878 000
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #589  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2019, 11:53 AM
JHikka's Avatar
JHikka JHikka is offline
ハルウララ
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 12,853
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #590  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2019, 1:43 PM
milomilo milomilo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Calgary
Posts: 10,499
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrAnKs View Post
PEI : 3

The (lack of) scaling of those bars is painful.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #591  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2019, 2:32 PM
Marty_Mcfly's Avatar
Marty_Mcfly Marty_Mcfly is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: St. John's, NL
Posts: 7,179
Whew, good thing we're near our potential. In 50 years someone else might think it'd be a good idea to throw up another hydro project in Labrador. So far we're 0/2 !
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #592  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2019, 2:33 PM
VANRIDERFAN's Avatar
VANRIDERFAN VANRIDERFAN is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Regina
Posts: 5,165
Quote:
Originally Posted by le calmar View Post
Interesting, I always assumed the entire Lower Mainland was suitable for agriculture but based on this graphic the city of Vancouver is sitting on bedrock.
Just the region around the Fraser River Delta. Mind you that region goes all the way to Chilliwack.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #593  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2019, 4:40 PM
isaidso isaidso is offline
The New Republic
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: United Provinces of America
Posts: 10,805
Quote:
Originally Posted by milomilo View Post
The (lack of) scaling of those bars is painful.
Hydro-electric is the cleanest major source of energy we have but it's not all positive. There are lots of negatives that result from damming rivers that rarely get aired.

Quote:
List of Cons of Hydropower

1. It can destroy natural habitats.
Any power plant that is on an industrial scale will have some unfavorable effects on the environment. When a dam is to be built, there will naturally be changes to the environment so that it can be done. And, these changes can have significant contributions to the destruction of natural habitats.

2. It still emits carbon dioxide and methane.
Hydropower reservoirs can still release a large amount of methane and carbon dioxide, as the areas around them is filled with water, trees and plants that can start rotting and decomposing through other method without using oxygen. This would mean that these power plants can cause decomposition that can dump a great amount of carbon dioxide and methane into the environment, increasing pollution.

3. It can cause flooding.
Records show that construction of dams have actually caused surrounding towns to be flooded out and taken over by water, causing them to be non-existent or underwater ghost towns.

4. It offers limited use.
As hydropower is produced by the water that depends on yearly rain, this means that only the areas using this method and receiving a good amount of rainfall can take advantage of this technology.

5. It risks extinction of species.
Whenever a hydropower dam changes the habitats of animals that exist in the area of construction, there is always the risk of extinction to a certain species. Dams can cause problems with flooding, which endangers animal life. Other than this, dams can change the flow of rivers and other waterways that can cause water shortages to the neighboring communities and local livestock.

6. It requires high installation costs.
Although the operating costs of dams are believed to be low, the construction and installations of dams, as well as the turbines, can cost a lot due to the many regions not currently employing this alternative source of energy. If the initial cost had been less, then many countries have already used this energy source more commonly, but their construction actually requires a lot of labor and human capital, not to mention that their maintenance is very expensive.

7. It promotes siting.
Some hydropower sites in the US have been widely contested, as many of them were seen as a major loss for conservation efforts, like the construction of the Hetch Hetchy Reservoir and O’Shaughnessy Dam in Yosemite National Park in 1923. Many of these developments were actually stopped by bitter opposition from environmental groups, who consider that the government was only prioritizing development over the natural resources of a region.

8. It risks breaking of dams.
There is a lot of dams that were built for industrial use but are not currently used and removed as they can cause serious flooding. This would affect a huge number of people, including their property.

https://greengarageblog.org/16-main-...-of-hydropower
__________________
World's First Documented Baseball Game: Beachville, Ontario, June 4th, 1838.
World's First Documented Gridiron Game: University College, Toronto, November 9th, 1861.
Hamilton Tiger-Cats since 1869 & Toronto Argonauts since 1873: North America's 2 oldest pro football teams
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #594  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2019, 10:33 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 12,629
Quote:
Originally Posted by VANRIDERFAN View Post
Just the region around the Fraser River Delta. Mind you that region goes all the way to Chilliwack.
There's still a fair amount of topsoil on the sandstone/shale areas. It may have originally been a bit acidic due to the predominance of conifers in the area but I doubt it would have been too problematic.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #595  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2019, 11:41 PM
milomilo milomilo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Calgary
Posts: 10,499
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marty_Mcfly View Post
Whew, good thing we're near our potential. In 50 years someone else might think it'd be a good idea to throw up another hydro project in Labrador. So far we're 0/2 !
The scale is complete wack on all those bars - but it appears you haven't haven't even got halfway! Maybe third time's the charm?

I wonder what they actually mean by potential though. You can't just flood everything, I doubt BC has any political capital left to build more hydro once Site C is done.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #596  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2019, 11:45 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 12,629
Hydro is still pretty popular here, just maybe not another megaproject. Small and medium sized projects would still have a lot of support I imagine*.

*Totally just a guess based off general vibes living here.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #597  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2019, 11:56 PM
Marty_Mcfly's Avatar
Marty_Mcfly Marty_Mcfly is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: St. John's, NL
Posts: 7,179
Quote:
Originally Posted by milomilo View Post
The scale is complete wack on all those bars - but it appears you haven't haven't even got halfway! Maybe third time's the charm?

I wonder what they actually mean by potential though. You can't just flood everything, I doubt BC has any political capital left to build more hydro once Site C is done.
My bad, I read that as total potential including what was already being utilized. Excellent, another generation can try to make a legacy around hydro projects! lol jk in 50 years there won't be enough people here to even consider another megaproject
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #598  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2019, 12:15 AM
vid's Avatar
vid vid is offline
I am a typical
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Thunder Bay
Posts: 41,172
I think the City of Thunder Bay alone has more MW of hydro electric generation in it than all of PEI. But to be completely honest, I'm surprised they even have 1 MW!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #599  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2019, 1:01 AM
Denscity Denscity is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Within the Cordillera
Posts: 12,493
Quote:
Originally Posted by vid View Post
I think the City of Thunder Bay alone has more MW of hydro electric generation in it than all of PEI. But to be completely honest, I'm surprised they even have 1 MW!
Same with Castlegar.
__________________
Castlegar BC: SSP's hottest city (43.9C)
Lytton BC: Canada’s hottest city (49.6C)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #600  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2019, 1:41 AM
Hali87 Hali87 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary
Posts: 4,465
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrAnKs View Post
PEI : 3

The numbers for NS seem really... wrong. It seems impossible that we would have as much hydro potential as Newfoundland (even if we're just talking untapped potential), nearly as much as Manitoba, and 8.5 times as much as New Brunswick. Maybe someone added an extra zero by accident?
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:19 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.