HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1961  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2020, 7:38 AM
hammersklavier's Avatar
hammersklavier hammersklavier is offline
Philly -> Osaka -> Tokyo
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The biggest city on earth. Literally
Posts: 5,863
I wonder if Amtrak already told Harris & Co to shove it, and that's why we had the Penn's Landing brouhaha.

If Center City is the only real option on Harris' table, then there are really only two available sites that will fit an arena: the 7th & Arch site (advantage for urbanists: pretty much every neighbor is institutional = minimal demolitions), and the VSE onramps at 15th & Vine. The 7th & Arch site would require a significant land assemblage and probably some compromise worked out w/r/t the Headhouse; however, most of the land there is parking lots, and it happens to be surrounded by institutional neighbors: the Feds, Temple Podiatric School, PennDOT, Franklin Square, the prison...It also boasts very easy access from the VSE, making a deep parking garage under the arena viable.

The 15th & Vine site would have to be built around the VSE onramps, will likely require negotiation with PennDOT to be done, is across the street from several residences (most notably the Alexander and Hanover North Broad), and would likely motivate nearby landowners to worsen the existing parking crater in the area, e.g. by pulling down the entire Hahnemann complex in favor of surface parking, but, all things considered, it's still the second best available site in the area, with very convenient VSE access (duh), a one-block walk from Race-Vine, and a ten-minute walk from Suburban Station.

In any event, the City needs to make clear that, whatever Josh Harris wants to do, he can do on his own dime. Getting told No by the DRWC was probably like a splash of cold water on his face, and he's realizing it's not going to be as easy to get the City to pay for his arena as he thought it would be.
__________________
Urban Rambles | Hidden City

Who knows but that, on the lower levels, I speak for you?’ (Ralph Ellison, Invisible Man)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1962  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2020, 5:02 PM
allovertown allovertown is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by City Wide View Post
I'm more then willing to accept your source that they want to be in control of their own building/environment and want to be in CC. But beyond that theres still alot of unknowns, like is their thinking that there has to be a large pile of public money involved and are they thinking primarily about the 50 dates the basketball team will be using the space or the 100+ dates something else might be taking place? And is this all just part of a long term plan to maximize the value of what they have to sell in X number of years?
To be clear, that's all I really know. Those unknowns are unknown to me as well. My friend isn't directly involved in the construction of the new arena. He's got a job somewhere within the Harris empire of companies and his job relates tangentially to some aspects of the new arena search and I only know what he knows.

The only thing you mentioned as an unknown that I feel like I could comment on is regarding how much the focus will be on non basketball events. I know the answer to that is that significant attention will be paid to the non basketball side of the equation and that data on these types of events was a major consideration in developing their plans specifically related to their downtown location search. Which isn't to say that it will be bad basketball arena. They just are putting the concert part of the equation much more to the forefront than the wells fargo center which famously has terrible acoustics.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1963  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2020, 6:13 PM
Londonee Londonee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Fitler Square (via London)
Posts: 2,048
Quote:
Originally Posted by hammersklavier View Post
I wonder if Amtrak already told Harris & Co to shove it, and that's why we had the Penn's Landing brouhaha.
Why would an organization that has no money and is barely able to function at all, say no to a potential air-rights windfall? They own all of this land adjacent to one of the densest cores in the country and it's effectively useless to them (other than parking for their contractors)?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1964  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2020, 1:32 AM
Groundhog's Avatar
Groundhog Groundhog is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by allovertown View Post
Lol even if people don't want to believe me and my source they did say publicly that they're committed to finding a location in Philly.

Honestly I thought Camden would and eventually still could be used as a bargaining chip. The tax revenue the city receives because sixers games take place in Philly is not insignificant. But if they do try to use it, it is a bluff.
Yeah, 90% of the time, if Harris or this front office says something publicly...it's a lie. I don't trust a word he says. Hopefully your source is valid and the argument being made makes sense. Maybe it's just the fan in me, but anything this organization says makes me immediately assume the opposite. Fingers crossed they end up building over the train tracks as part of the 30th Street plan for an extremely iconic location and view (imagine seeing the art museum from a window inside the arena), but really, I dream that they end up with a spite stadium across from Wells Fargo.
__________________
You must construct additional pylons.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1965  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2020, 1:41 AM
summersm343's Avatar
summersm343 summersm343 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 18,367
Quote:
Originally Posted by Londonee View Post
Why would an organization that has no money and is barely able to function at all, say no to a potential air-rights windfall? They own all of this land adjacent to one of the densest cores in the country and it's effectively useless to them (other than parking for their contractors)?
Yeah, I agree. There's no way Amtrak would've told the Sixers to piss off. Someone looking to develop they're land which they're generating no money from? Yeah, no way.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1966  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2020, 1:26 PM
Justin7 Justin7 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 821
Would a move to the Camden waterfront be such a bad thing? I personally would prefer this to the stadium complex.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1967  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2020, 2:18 PM
Urbanthusiat's Avatar
Urbanthusiat Urbanthusiat is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: South Philly
Posts: 1,680
Quote:
Originally Posted by Justin7 View Post
Would a move to the Camden waterfront be such a bad thing? I personally would prefer this to the stadium complex.
If you live in PA - which is probably 70% of their fans - yes. I can tell you right now I probably wouldn’t get a 10-game package anymore if they moved to Camden. Too much of a pain in the ass to get to.

Last edited by Urbanthusiat; Sep 19, 2020 at 2:56 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1968  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2020, 3:11 PM
allovertown allovertown is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by Justin7 View Post
Would a move to the Camden waterfront be such a bad thing? I personally would prefer this to the stadium complex.
Because of the run up to the BF Bridge the closest subway stop is half a mile from the waterfront and the closest off ramp off of 676 is a mile away. And that's a straight path to the river where the aquarium and brand new office buildings already exist. Actual distances would be longer.

It's not as convenient as you'd think. And the area is about as devoid of culture and filled with parking lots as the stadium complex is.

It's a lateral move at best, a negative move even in the eyes of most.

And again, a big part of this is non basketball events, which their research indicates that a downtown location would give them a leg up in the battle with wells fargo. If they move to Camden waterfront they're just one of two area arenas in cultureless parking lot seas and one of two 20,000 seat concert venues on the Camden waterfront.

They're not moving to Camden.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1969  
Old Posted Sep 22, 2020, 1:35 AM
Skyscraper.Phanatic Skyscraper.Phanatic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 135
15th and Vine Idea

I have not posted on here in ages, but feel compelled to do so. The 15th and Vine Idea proposed by Hamesklivier, is unfortunately utterly ridiculous. The Vine street interchange / overpass would require hundreds of millions in infrastructure redesign. When Blatstein was going to put the casino in the area he was going to re-use the Inquirer building annex. The community college has also built apartment towers on half of one of the lots. Hahnemann will not be torn down as they are trying to get $500,000,000 for it and the lot next door for a condo/apt/hotel complex. S. Yards or 30th street make some sense. The Disney Hole at 8th and Market might be a fit; if they knock down that old building Jeffferson rents space in as alot of the mmedical offices may move to the new hospital at 12 and Walnut anyway.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1970  
Old Posted Sep 22, 2020, 4:09 PM
DudeGuy's Avatar
DudeGuy DudeGuy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Center City Philadelphia
Posts: 281
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyscraper.Phanatic View Post
The Disney Hole at 8th and Market might be a fit; if they knock down that old building Jeffferson rents space in as alot of the mmedical offices may move to the new hospital at 12 and Walnut anyway.
I'm a proponent of the 8th and Market location. However I'd be very bummed if they knocked down the Jefferson building. It's got a great facade on 9th street and Chestnut. I'd hope that if an arena were to go there, it would keep the facade/general design elements of the building.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1971  
Old Posted Sep 22, 2020, 4:56 PM
allovertown allovertown is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyscraper.Phanatic View Post
I have not posted on here in ages, but feel compelled to do so. The 15th and Vine Idea proposed by Hamesklivier, is unfortunately utterly ridiculous. The Vine street interchange / overpass would require hundreds of millions in infrastructure redesign. When Blatstein was going to put the casino in the area he was going to re-use the Inquirer building annex. The community college has also built apartment towers on half of one of the lots. Hahnemann will not be torn down as they are trying to get $500,000,000 for it and the lot next door for a condo/apt/hotel complex. S. Yards or 30th street make some sense. The Disney Hole at 8th and Market might be a fit; if they knock down that old building Jeffferson rents space in as alot of the mmedical offices may move to the new hospital at 12 and Walnut anyway.
Hahnemann is the only site other than Penn's Landing, that I know with certainty was actually considered. So not that ridiculous.

Have no idea how seriously it was considered or how likely it is. But i know that they mocked up multiple different layouts for how an arena could fit into the assemblage of properties Hahnemann has over there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1972  
Old Posted Sep 22, 2020, 5:18 PM
Skyscraper.Phanatic Skyscraper.Phanatic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 135
15th and Vine Idea

Allovertown, Why would a developer want to pay $500,000,000 for the Hahnemann site and $550,000,000 for infrustructure improvements to build an arena on top of or near that interchange?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1973  
Old Posted Sep 22, 2020, 5:39 PM
allovertown allovertown is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyscraper.Phanatic View Post
Allovertown, Why would a developer want to pay $500,000,000 for the Hahnemann site and $550,000,000 for infrustructure improvements to build an arena on top of or near that interchange?


I don't have any information other than it was considered. Maybe they don't want to build there after looking into it. Kicking the tires on the Hahnemann site took place well before I heard about the Penn's Landing plan, so maybe they moved on. I'm just saying I wouldn't be so dismissive of the possibility.

Last edited by allovertown; Sep 22, 2020 at 7:39 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1974  
Old Posted Sep 22, 2020, 7:09 PM
Groundhog's Avatar
Groundhog Groundhog is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyscraper.Phanatic View Post
Allovertown, Why would a developer want to pay $500,000,000 for the Hahnemann site and $550,000,000 for infrustructure improvements to build an arena on top of or near that interchange?
Because they expect to use our money to pay for it.
__________________
You must construct additional pylons.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1975  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2020, 6:52 PM
McBane McBane is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 3,718
Quote:
Originally Posted by DudeGuy View Post
I'm a proponent of the 8th and Market location. However I'd be very bummed if they knocked down the Jefferson building. It's got a great facade on 9th street and Chestnut. I'd hope that if an arena were to go there, it would keep the facade/general design elements of the building.

So desperate for something at 8th and Market, sure. The only thing that would really satisfy me at the Disneyhole i multiple 600+ towers with at least some commercial component (residential, in Philly at least, rarely eclipses 500 ft). Obviously, that won't ever happen in my lifetime. The city is deficient when it comes to attracting/retaining large employers and anything that does happen in that regard, SY and the NY are more logical destinations. So fuck it.

My one concern is what impact an arena will have in the area. How many landlords will let their buildings rot to demolish and build a garage? How many existing parking lots that we all hope to see turn into something meaningful, will continue to operate as parking lots?

I suppose an arena can help energize an area but at the same time, it is likely to proliferate parking at the expense of anything better.

And p.s., any project that involves the demo of any existing buildings (esp the one pictured here) to make way for an arena or parking is a big fat NO in my book. Disneyhole is big enough and if it's not enough, then find another site.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1976  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2020, 6:58 PM
mcgrath618's Avatar
mcgrath618 mcgrath618 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Clark Park, Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 3,634
Quote:
Originally Posted by McBane View Post
So desperate for something at 8th and Market, sure. The only thing that would really satisfy me at the Disneyhole i multiple 600+ towers with at least some commercial component (residential, in Philly at least, rarely eclipses 500 ft). Obviously, that won't ever happen in my lifetime. The city is deficient when it comes to attracting/retaining large employers and anything that does happen in that regard, SY and the NY are more logical destinations. So fuck it.

My one concern is what impact an arena will have in the area. How many landlords will let their buildings rot to demolish and build a garage? How many existing parking lots that we all hope to see turn into something meaningful, will continue to operate as parking lots?

I suppose an arena can help energize an area but at the same time, it is likely to proliferate parking at the expense of anything better.

And p.s., any project that involves the demo of any existing buildings (esp the one pictured here) to make way for an arena or parking is a big fat NO in my book. Disneyhole is big enough and if it's not enough, then find another site.
+1. If whatever is built in the Disney Hole is < 500 ft, I will be disappointed.
__________________
Philadelphia Transportation Thread: http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=164129
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1977  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2020, 8:45 PM
700 Level 700 Level is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 159
My opinion for the best Sixers arena location: the block bounded by Market, Filbert, 10th and 11th. Yes, the location that just received significant investment as a part of the Fashion District. But that was a gamble and it looks pretty clear that gamble will not pay off (see Century 21 bankruptcy). Despite the recent spending, the current structure is just not worth that much in today's world. And you could keep the other sections of retail and keep retail at street level for this block - build the arena on top. The location is literally connected to regional rail, the trolley lines, the El, and PATCO. The parking capacity already in place for the Convention Center can be used (even more convenient than to 8th and Market). And god it looks ugly as it stands today. Finally, you have the whole of Eastern Center City at your doorstep for pre and post event activities. PREIT - make a deal.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1978  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2020, 9:40 PM
mcgrath618's Avatar
mcgrath618 mcgrath618 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Clark Park, Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 3,634
Quote:
Originally Posted by 700 Level View Post
My opinion for the best Sixers arena location: the block bounded by Market, Filbert, 10th and 11th. Yes, the location that just received significant investment as a part of the Fashion District. But that was a gamble and it looks pretty clear that gamble will not pay off (see Century 21 bankruptcy). Despite the recent spending, the current structure is just not worth that much in today's world. And you could keep the other sections of retail and keep retail at street level for this block - build the arena on top. The location is literally connected to regional rail, the trolley lines, the El, and PATCO. The parking capacity already in place for the Convention Center can be used (even more convenient than to 8th and Market). And god it looks ugly as it stands today. Finally, you have the whole of Eastern Center City at your doorstep for pre and post event activities. PREIT - make a deal.
Any plan that gets rid of the Gallery is fine by me.
__________________
Philadelphia Transportation Thread: http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=164129
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1979  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2020, 10:00 PM
allovertown allovertown is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by McBane View Post
So desperate for something at 8th and Market, sure. The only thing that would really satisfy me at the Disneyhole i multiple 600+ towers with at least some commercial component (residential, in Philly at least, rarely eclipses 500 ft). Obviously, that won't ever happen in my lifetime. The city is deficient when it comes to attracting/retaining large employers and anything that does happen in that regard, SY and the NY are more logical destinations. So fuck it.

My one concern is what impact an arena will have in the area. How many landlords will let their buildings rot to demolish and build a garage? How many existing parking lots that we all hope to see turn into something meaningful, will continue to operate as parking lots?

I suppose an arena can help energize an area but at the same time, it is likely to proliferate parking at the expense of anything better.

And p.s., any project that involves the demo of any existing buildings (esp the one pictured here) to make way for an arena or parking is a big fat NO in my book. Disneyhole is big enough and if it's not enough, then find another site.
How many people already work in the area? Drive in to conventions? Are in the area for tourism? Live nearby?

I don't know. I know 19,000 people is a lot and maybe it drives demand for some more parking structures, but there are already multiple garages in the area to serve the significant demand for parking that already exists. Considering Work, convention, and tourist parking demand is generally during the day and events at the arena will generally take place at night, I don't know if this significantly adds to demand for parking at all.

You've already got the giant garage on 8th and Arch that the PPA just refurbished. You've got the giant Gallery Parking Garage between 8th and 9th on Filbert. Another Parking Garage at 7th and Market. There is a huge parking garage under the Independence Visitor Center that is completely empty at night. A giant block bounded by 9th, 10th, Chestnut and Sansom is entirely dedicated to parking including a large garage.

And all of that is within two blocks, a sub 10 minute walk. And that is not even including numerous surface lots in the area. And if you expand beyond to three blocks and mostly still staying within a 10 minute walk, there is also a huge garage at the national constitution center, another big one at the bourse and more parking at the convention center.

This area is loaded with parking. If people weren't motivated to "let their buildings rot" to demolish them for parking previously, I don't think they will be if an arena was built there. Not to mention, you can just zone areas to not allow new parking structures.

Whether or not 8th and Market is a good place for an arena is a legitimate question. But the idea that building an arena there would lead to the sudden destruction of buildings and the proliferation of parking garage does not seem to me, to be a reasonable concern. This area already has tons of people parking in the area during the day and plenty of parking spaces to accommodate them, spaces that largely sit empty when this arena would host events.

At worst you could argue it makes existing garages in the area more profitable, so it's less likely they're torn down and replaced with development. For example, Brandywine owns the garage at 7th and Market and plans to develop it in the future but is running the garage for now. An arena a block away would probably make developing that land less urgent.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1980  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2020, 11:50 PM
3rd&Brown 3rd&Brown is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,372
If I didn't know the title on this blog, I would assume the Philadelphia sub-forum was populated by car-dependent suburbanites with hard ons for Skyscrapers with no actual interest in how the most vibrant cities actual function.

Making the case that 8th & Market couldn't handle 19K people steps from a subway, a regional rail system, a trolley, 2 highways, and hundreds of blocks of a street grid that emanate out from the facility but yet somehow a facility on Packer Avenue a mile plus from a single subway could is the literal definition of stupidity.

It's exhausting.

The Barclays Center has proven that on top of transit is exactly where you want your arena to be.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:09 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.