HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2581  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2013, 4:37 PM
phoenixboi08's Avatar
phoenixboi08 phoenixboi08 is offline
Transport Planner
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 577
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadcruiser1 View Post
The LIRR and the Metro North is way too far to serve the World Trade Center. PATH doesn't run anywhere near an airport. The A line is the only subway line that serves JFK Airport and would run to the World Trade Center. That is it.
You misunderstood my point...
__________________
"I'm not an armchair urbanist; not yet a licensed planner"
MCRP '16
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2582  
Old Posted Jun 10, 2013, 4:08 PM
babybackribs2314 babybackribs2314 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: UWS, Manhattan
Posts: 1,728
Today's update on the site; the 'spine' of the future wings is in full view!

Calatrava Transit Hub June 2013 Construction Update

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2583  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2013, 12:43 AM
Crawford Crawford is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 30,769
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadcruiser1 View Post
The LIRR and the Metro North is way too far to serve the World Trade Center.
But the LIRR could access the WTC via the current line to Flatbush Ave. It's already 90% operational between JFK and the WTC. You just need to get the LIRR from downtown Brooklyn to the WTC terminal. That was the plan under the Pataki and Spitzer administrations, and the MTA budgeted $2 billion for the new tunnel (which wouldn't have been enough on it's own, but would have made huge progress).

I don't how much of that $2 billion is still hanging around, though. It's officially "on hold", and you know how transit projects take forever.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadcruiser1 View Post
PATH doesn't run anywhere near an airport. The A line is the only subway line that serves JFK Airport and would run to the World Trade Center. That is it.
PATH runs very close to Newark Airport, and is being expanded to Newark Airport. It's already in the PATH budget.

No one is talking about subway expansion to JFK airport. You already have the A, E, J, and Z trains connecting to Airtrain, so if you want to take the subway to JFK you have multiple options.

The issue is getting faster limited-stop or nonstop trains to JFK, which was the plan with LIRR. The Airtrain is not an airport monorail; it's double-tracked and built to accommodate heavy rail trains, so you could run LIRR trains on the current Airtrain network, and then switch to the current LIRR line in Jamaica.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2584  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2013, 4:57 AM
fimiak's Avatar
fimiak fimiak is offline
Build Baby Build
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 965
LIRR running on Airtrain? Sounds a little simcity too me..
__________________
San Francisco Projects List ∞ The city that knows how ∞ 2017 ∞ 884,363 ∞ ~2030 ∞ 1,000,000
San Francisco Projects ThreadOakland Projects ThreadOceanwide Center - 275M/901'
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2585  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2013, 5:47 AM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,381
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crawford View Post
The issue is getting faster limited-stop or nonstop trains to JFK, which was the plan with LIRR. The Airtrain is not an airport monorail; it's double-tracked and built to accommodate heavy rail trains, so you could run LIRR trains on the current Airtrain network, and then switch to the current LIRR line in Jamaica.
Not quite. IIRC the AirTrain structure will not handle the load of heavy LIRR trains, but a new train could be designed that is lightweight and intercompatible. Both systems draw power from a third rail.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2586  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2013, 3:06 PM
JACKinBeantown's Avatar
JACKinBeantown JACKinBeantown is offline
JACKinBeantown
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Location: Location:
Posts: 8,847
Intermediate rib pieces seem to be being installed (between the base and the wings).
__________________
Hi.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2587  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2013, 7:56 PM
deepen915 deepen915 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Sayreville, NJ
Posts: 217
Quote:
Originally Posted by JACKinBeantown View Post
Intermediate rib pieces seem to be being installed (between the base and the wings).
as seen in this pic?

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2588  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2013, 3:04 PM
JACKinBeantown's Avatar
JACKinBeantown JACKinBeantown is offline
JACKinBeantown
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Location: Location:
Posts: 8,847
Quote:
Originally Posted by deepen915 View Post
as seen in this pic?

Apparently not (the image isn't showing up).
__________________
Hi.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2589  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2013, 6:02 PM
Crawford Crawford is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 30,769
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
Not quite. IIRC the AirTrain structure will not handle the load of heavy LIRR trains, but a new train could be designed that is lightweight and intercompatible. Both systems draw power from a third rail.
You're right that the current rolling stock couldn't run on the AirTrain, but it was never intended to conform to the current rolling stock.

The point is that the Airtrain was built in order to eventually run LIRR trains. That wasn't a side-benefit; it was the whole point (and is also why the airlines protested funding JFK Airtrain, because they said it wasn't an airport-specific improvement but a regular public transit improvement).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2590  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2013, 3:40 PM
phoenixboi08's Avatar
phoenixboi08 phoenixboi08 is offline
Transport Planner
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 577
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crawford View Post
But the LIRR could access the WTC via the current line to Flatbush Ave. It's already 90% operational between JFK and the WTC. You just need to get the LIRR from downtown Brooklyn to the WTC terminal. That was the plan under the Pataki and Spitzer administrations, and the MTA budgeted $2 billion for the new tunnel (which wouldn't have been enough on it's own, but would have made huge progress).

I don't how much of that $2 billion is still hanging around, though. It's officially "on hold", and you know how transit projects take forever.


PATH runs very close to Newark Airport, and is being expanded to Newark Airport. It's already in the PATH budget.

No one is talking about subway expansion to JFK airport. You already have the A, E, J, and Z trains connecting to Airtrain, so if you want to take the subway to JFK you have multiple options.

The issue is getting faster limited-stop or nonstop trains to JFK, which was the plan with LIRR. The Airtrain is not an airport monorail; it's double-tracked and built to accommodate heavy rail trains, so you could run LIRR trains on the current Airtrain network, and then switch to the current LIRR line in Jamaica.
That's what I was thinking while I was there.
I was staying in Brooklyn so the subway ride wasn't that bad.
I also realized I could have just taken the LIRR as well, but was a bit nervous to do that as I wasn't that familiar with scheduling.
__________________
"I'm not an armchair urbanist; not yet a licensed planner"
MCRP '16
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2591  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2013, 11:59 PM
Spotila's Avatar
Spotila Spotila is offline
Map Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 234
Ribs and spine!
__________________
EZRD.info - Simple Movie, TV, and Game Release Dates

https://www.facebook.com/EZRDSocial
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2592  
Old Posted Jun 21, 2013, 7:21 PM
Tall guy 31 Tall guy 31 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 109
Trees coming to the NE section soon??? Looks like they're putting dirt into the holes where the trees are suppose to be. You figure this might be the last step before planting, eh??
Reply With Quote
     
           
     
  #2594  
Old Posted Jun 27, 2013, 11:17 PM
jd3189 jd3189 is online now
An Optimistic Realist
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Loma Linda, CA / West Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 5,595
Another Calatrava project shows pretty well what the new station will look like.

http://www.intbau.org/archive/newsarchive2003.htm

__________________
Working towards making American cities walkable again!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2595  
Old Posted Jun 27, 2013, 11:35 PM
antinimby antinimby is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: In syndication
Posts: 2,098
And I'll bet that one costs a whole lot less than this one.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2596  
Old Posted Jun 30, 2013, 1:18 PM
phoenixboi08's Avatar
phoenixboi08 phoenixboi08 is offline
Transport Planner
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 577
Considering it's a museum and not a subterranean structure, I'd certainly hope so.
__________________
"I'm not an armchair urbanist; not yet a licensed planner"
MCRP '16
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2597  
Old Posted Jul 1, 2013, 3:02 AM
CalibratedZeus CalibratedZeus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Branchburg, NJ
Posts: 130
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2598  
Old Posted Jul 1, 2013, 6:22 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,900
http://www.news24.com/Travel/Interna...shape-20130628

NYC ground zero museum takes shape


2013-07-01

Quote:
Throughout the museum, curators have hung pieces of steel that were bent and twisted into striking shapes, including one sheet of metal that now appears to ripple like a flag and a huge girder bent by the impact of the aircraft hitting the towers.

Many of them look like sculptures.

"In a strange way, they are like pieces of art," Katsimatides said. But Daniels added that they weren't chosen for their beauty, but to explain what happened at the site on 9/11.

A few design elements of the museum are still under discussion.

When visitors descend to the very bottom of the museum — where, in some places, they will be able to view the very bedrock that the towers once rested upon — they will enter a hall with a large wall bearing an inscription from Virgil. "No day shall erase you from the memory of time."

Behind that wall will sit a special mausoleum, off limits to the general public, containing the unidentified remains of hundreds of 9/11 victims. Most of the interior walls of the museum have the look of bare concrete, as a constant reminder of the site's location within the old trade center foundation. But Daniels said the museum's designers are talking about possibly cladding this wall in a different material, or a different color, to separate it from the rest.

"It's a special place. Do we need something to distinguish it?" he said.

The bulk of the work remaining to be completed will revolve around installing the museum's exhibits, which will include many artifacts, including a wall made up of portraits of all 2 983 victims and a room where visitors will be able to call up video presentations that tell a story about each of them.

"The idea is to learn about the lives that they lived, not just the deaths that they died," Daniels said.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2599  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2013, 1:19 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,900
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2600  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2013, 8:03 PM
randy1991 randy1991 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 72
Looking good!

Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:32 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.