HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #61  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2023, 12:10 AM
mhays mhays is offline
Never Dell
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 19,804
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trae View Post
^^^that's not really a problem. you don't need to build new towers right now. more than enough empty office space to convert to residential first
Not what I'm hearing. Conversions are really hard, worse than new construction in many cases, particularly in seismic zones. The gist of what I'm hearing in Seattle is that the building needs to be at a fire-sale price.

Even if it was easy, why wait two years to start a project when demand exists now and projects are ready to go?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #62  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2023, 4:16 PM
iheartthed iheartthed is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 9,894
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhays View Post
The cuts are maybe five percent. Only a fraction of what's been added during Covid.

Of course even 0% would be a hit vs. continuous heavy growth, so it's significant, but it's still not that massive.

One upside is that other firms can finally find people if they still want them. And some grads will start new businesses. Layoffs are a gold mine long-term.

Office space might be a problem though. Especially since we keep starting new buildings.
Anecdotally, the Google and Microsoft cuts appear to be focused on the top of the pay scale. I'm seeing a lot of people who had been in their jobs 10+ years talk of being let go. Either way, this will definitely cool the tech cities off for a bit. Not saying they will turn into the Rust Belt, but we'll likely see some softer growth and real estate price increases on the West Coast.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #63  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2023, 5:20 PM
cabasse's Avatar
cabasse cabasse is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: atalanta
Posts: 4,174
Quote:
Originally Posted by iheartthed View Post
Anecdotally, the Google and Microsoft cuts appear to be focused on the top of the pay scale. I'm seeing a lot of people who had been in their jobs 10+ years talk of being let go. Either way, this will definitely cool the tech cities off for a bit. Not saying they will turn into the Rust Belt, but we'll likely see some softer growth and real estate price increases on the West Coast.

i know of at least one local ex-microsoft employee who was an extremely well paid director of sales (300k+) who was let go about 6 months back. that seems to align with what you're saying (culling at the top)
__________________
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #64  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2023, 5:46 PM
homebucket homebucket is online now
你的媽媽
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Bay
Posts: 8,792
Mmhm. A lot of the Meta and Google employees that got laid off were making 500-1000k a year.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #65  
Old Posted Jan 22, 2023, 5:53 PM
mhays mhays is offline
Never Dell
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 19,804
Quote:
Originally Posted by iheartthed View Post
Anecdotally, the Google and Microsoft cuts appear to be focused on the top of the pay scale. I'm seeing a lot of people who had been in their jobs 10+ years talk of being let go. Either way, this will definitely cool the tech cities off for a bit. Not saying they will turn into the Rust Belt, but we'll likely see some softer growth and real estate price increases on the West Coast.
Probably, in the short term. But those people might tend to have decent net worths so they can handle some down time. And many will be qualified and able to start new companies, or help other people's new companies.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #66  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2023, 12:09 AM
jd3189 jd3189 is offline
An Optimistic Realist
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Loma Linda, CA / West Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 5,598
^^^ If that's the case, that's probably the best example of laying off I would accept. If I had to choose between a high earner who already has savings, property, investments, etc over a low income laborer who has little if anything to supplement a lost job, I would fire the former.

Edit: but this is ultimately a catch-22. I heard many of those workers were long tenured. Gave their heart and soul to the company and rose up through the ranks. Did it fairly, by merit, followed the American dream. Yet they still can use their job. It sucks. But, hey, it’s better than just keeping everyone employed but taking a hit with profits having to be taken from the earnings of executives and shareholders. You would rather objectively ruin someone’s life taking away what is often their main source of income just so you can satisfy individuals who don’t need to work for a living. Damn, business is cutthroat

Greed is just as bad as envy. In fact, they’re two sides of the same coin.
__________________
Working towards making American cities walkable again!

Last edited by jd3189; Jan 23, 2023 at 10:08 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:03 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.