HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > Halifax > Suburbs


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2020, 1:57 AM
ns_kid's Avatar
ns_kid ns_kid is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 492
[Dartmouth] The Bello (2 Montobello) | 19 m | 6 fl | U/C

I thought it was worth opening a thread for this development. Harbour East Marine Drive Community Council considered a revised proposal from developer G2J Residential Holdings (Tony Chedrawy) at its meeting on 6 August.

The proposal is for a 40-unit residential construction at the corner of Waverley Road and Montebello Drive in the Westphal area, with potential commercial space on Waverley Road. The building will take in three lots (246 Waverley and 2 & 4 Montebello currently zoned R-1; three additional lots on adjacent Micmac Street would also be incorporated).

The community council agreed with staff to recommend to HRM council a rezoning to WR Mixed-Use, requiring a public hearing. An earlier public information meeting, in September 2017, heard some support for the original 56-unit proposal but also concerns about traffic and size. While it's true the building will replace single unit homes, it is also true there are numerous commercial uses surrounding the property (a Tim Hortons; two strip malls; two auto repair shops) and a couple of three-story apartment buildings a few blocks east.

Case 20756

Community council minutes

Five storeys on Waverley Road:



Three storeys at rear of property:

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2020, 11:41 AM
IanWatson IanWatson is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,227
Looks like it could be nice. I like how it handles the grade.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Aug 27, 2020, 4:50 PM
Jstaleness's Avatar
Jstaleness Jstaleness is offline
Jelly Bean Sandwich
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Dartmouth
Posts: 1,683
This is not terrible. | don't live in this specific part Dartmouth but I'm there often enough. I approve.
__________________
I can't hear you with my eyes closed
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2021, 4:41 PM
Dmajackson's Avatar
Dmajackson Dmajackson is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: B3K Halifax, NS
Posts: 9,354
The application for the development agreement portion of this approval process is now underway. Apparently the developer is also upgrading Waverley Road in front of the development to include a right-turn lane and extend the bike lanes to the intersection.

Case 23374 Details
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2021, 11:06 PM
ns_kid's Avatar
ns_kid ns_kid is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 492
Fencing went up around the site this week. To the best of my knowledge, there has not yet been a staff report to community council. (Public consultation phase wrapped up in mid-June.) I assume the developer is preparing only to demolish the existing properties.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Nov 12, 2021, 12:09 AM
Querce Querce is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 129
https://www.halifax.ca/city-hall/com...munity-council

The staff report was included in the November 4th HEMDCC meeting, staff recommendation was against, but community council approved it for a public hearing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Nov 12, 2021, 12:27 AM
ns_kid's Avatar
ns_kid ns_kid is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 492
Quote:
Originally Posted by Querce View Post
https://www.halifax.ca/city-hall/com...munity-council

The staff report was included in the November 4th HEMDCC meeting, staff recommendation was against, but community council approved it for a public hearing
Good catch, thanks!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Nov 12, 2021, 12:25 PM
ns_kid's Avatar
ns_kid ns_kid is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 492
I've read the staff report, which recommends community council reject the developer's proposed development agreement. I find it a curious document. It rightly notes that the 42-unit structure is larger than any other in the vicinity and that it backs on single-family properties on Micmac Drive. [Irrelevant sidebar: What happened to HRM's goal of eliminating confusing and duplicated street names? There are at least five streets in the municipality bearing the unfortunate "micmac" label.] It suggests no more than 22 one-bedroom units should be allowed, applying R-3 principles to this mixed-used zone.

The report acknowledges that the property is bounded on three sides by commercial uses, taking care to underline that these rise no more than two storeys. But it seems to dismiss the import of this, something that will be a surprise to most residents in the area, who could reasonably point out that these uses produce far more traffic, noise and disruption than the proposed development ever could: a busy Tim Horton's immediately next door; two auto-repair shops; two retail plazas; and a bar/nightclub. One wonders, if the developer proposed to erect a McDonald's on the corner instead, how the planners could reasonably argue it was incompatible with the neighbourhood.

The report also contends that the nearest large residential development of "comparable scale" is Horizon Court, 1600 metres away. Why this is relevant is unclear to me, but it is also demonstrably false. The 66-unit Admiral Long Term Care Centre (Admiral St) is 1500 metres away; two eight-storey apartment buildings are 1400 metres away (Kennedy/Churchill), with over 240 units combined; all those buildings are in primarily low-density residential areas.

Many of those who spoke during the public information process felt the project was an improvement to the neighbourhood; some spoke to the promise of being able to stay in the community if they were to downsize from their current homes. One hopes those voices will be heard during any public hearing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Nov 12, 2021, 7:17 PM
Keith P.'s Avatar
Keith P. Keith P. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,017
A variation on Shakespeare's famous line seems appropriate here: "The first thing we do, let's fire all the planners."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2022, 9:44 PM
Dmajackson's Avatar
Dmajackson Dmajackson is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: B3K Halifax, NS
Posts: 9,354
A construction permit has been issued for this site. It is listed as 42 Units / 6 FL.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Oct 12, 2022, 2:59 AM
Dmajackson's Avatar
Dmajackson Dmajackson is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: B3K Halifax, NS
Posts: 9,354
Driving down The Circ today I noticed a crane going up in the distance beyond Lake MicMac. I think it must be this site. Can anyone confirm?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Oct 12, 2022, 12:30 PM
kph06's Avatar
kph06 kph06 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dmajackson View Post
Driving down The Circ today I noticed a crane going up in the distance beyond Lake MicMac. I think it must be this site. Can anyone confirm?
Developments HFX on Facebook had photos of the orange base over the weekend.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Oct 12, 2022, 1:28 PM
Dartguard Dartguard is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 672
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dmajackson View Post
Driving down The Circ today I noticed a crane going up in the distance beyond Lake MicMac. I think it must be this site. Can anyone confirm?
I drove right beside the site yesterday down Montebello. The tower pieces had been erected with the crane itself had yet to be installed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2022, 6:42 PM
Jstaleness's Avatar
Jstaleness Jstaleness is offline
Jelly Bean Sandwich
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Dartmouth
Posts: 1,683
I was there last night. Crane is fully up and work continuing.
__________________
I can't hear you with my eyes closed
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Oct 27, 2022, 3:47 AM
Dmajackson's Avatar
Dmajackson Dmajackson is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: B3K Halifax, NS
Posts: 9,354
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2023, 6:52 PM
ns_kid's Avatar
ns_kid ns_kid is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 492
Thought it was timely to post an update on this one.

The building has topped out, and underground utilities seem to have been completed (and resurfaced) within the last couple of weeks. It's likely the crane will be removed soon.

Given staff's opposition to this modest development, it will be interesting to see how the process will play out for the 13-storey proposal now in the works for 217 Waverley, 500 metres and a couple of blocks away.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2023, 7:05 PM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 33,694
Quote:
Originally Posted by ns_kid View Post
Given staff's opposition to this modest development
Thanks for posting the update. I wonder if staff ever follow up to confirm the property tax value depression that occurs after these Blade Runner style developments cause abandonment of adjacent properties.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2023, 8:31 PM
ns_kid's Avatar
ns_kid ns_kid is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 492
Quote:
Originally Posted by someone123 View Post
Thanks for posting the update. I wonder if staff ever follow up to confirm the property tax value depression that occurs after these Blade Runner style developments cause abandonment of adjacent properties.
I can only attest that construction over the last year has only been a windfall for the Tim Hortons next door and, I’m guessing, for the Subway and Leo’s Pizza across the street. 😁
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > Halifax > Suburbs
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:37 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.