Quote:
Originally Posted by bob rulz
People who fight a new condo development as a sign of gentrification - especially when those condos are going in on a lot that's been vacant for years as seems to be the case with this one - are fighting the wrong battles. Gentrification is a real issue, but those condos going in on the vacant lot next door are not the cause of it.
|
I’d mostly agree. Just sucks that any great potential an empty lot could have is usually eaten up by the developments we hate the most.
We all know that the shitty gentrifications are waaaay more common. Look at the Sugarhouse neighborhood and say no mo.