HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1161  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2015, 8:44 AM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,412
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Lurker View Post
I thought that was Wanda tower
Should be closer to Aon if it is as they're a block and a 1/2 apart.

Unless he put in the far-fetched 'Dream Tower'.
__________________
titanic1
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1162  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2015, 2:16 PM
harryc's Avatar
harryc harryc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Park, Il
Posts: 14,989
200 N Michigan

Oct 6 - crane coming down.








Oct 17


__________________
Harry C - Urbanize Chicago- My Flickr stream HRC_OakPark
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. B Franklin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1163  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2015, 2:42 PM
BrandonJXN's Avatar
BrandonJXN BrandonJXN is offline
Ascension
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Riverside, California
Posts: 5,404
Am I the only one who thinks that 200 N. Michigan should've been at least 20 stories taller? It's far from an ugly building. Just needs a bit more.
__________________
Washed Out
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1164  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2015, 2:43 PM
harryc's Avatar
harryc harryc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Park, Il
Posts: 14,989
215 W Lake

Soil samples the hard way (last month)






(as reported by others - vacated and ready for the wreckers)


__________________
Harry C - Urbanize Chicago- My Flickr stream HRC_OakPark
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. B Franklin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1165  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2015, 3:22 PM
emathias emathias is offline
Adoptive Chicagoan
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: River North, Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 5,157
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Lurker View Post
What am i missing?
Quote:
Originally Posted by BVictor1 View Post
What's the blue line to the right of Trump?



No blue hair... More like middle-age yuppie butt-hurt.
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Lurker View Post
I thought that was Wanda tower
Quote:
Originally Posted by BVictor1 View Post
Should be closer to Aon if it is as they're a block and a 1/2 apart.

Unless he put in the far-fetched 'Dream Tower'.
From left to right:

Wolf Point, Wanda Vista, 800 S, 1000 S, 113 East.

Here's an illustration of positioning. Green dots are existing buildings, red dots the new ones. The blue triangle shows the field of view.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1166  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2015, 3:39 PM
BrandonJXN's Avatar
BrandonJXN BrandonJXN is offline
Ascension
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Riverside, California
Posts: 5,404
^ Very nice.
__________________
Washed Out
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1167  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2015, 3:42 PM
harryc's Avatar
harryc harryc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Park, Il
Posts: 14,989
200 N Mich

9/22


10/17




__________________
Harry C - Urbanize Chicago- My Flickr stream HRC_OakPark
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. B Franklin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1168  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2015, 3:44 PM
harryc's Avatar
harryc harryc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Park, Il
Posts: 14,989
Quote:
Originally Posted by emathias View Post
From left to right:

Wolf Point, Wanda Vista, 800 S, 1000 S, 113 East.

Here's an illustration of positioning. Green dots are existing buildings, red dots the new ones. The blue triangle shows the field of view.
Way cool - thx
__________________
Harry C - Urbanize Chicago- My Flickr stream HRC_OakPark
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. B Franklin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1169  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2015, 5:16 PM
george's Avatar
george george is offline
dream fast
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: east village, chicago
Posts: 3,290
Nice pics from the Open House, Harry. ^ Love that Old Republic Building, Sky-Line Club... a great perch w views. Pic from last year.

__________________
To have ambition was my ambition - Gang of Four
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1170  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2015, 5:28 PM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,543
Quote:
Originally Posted by b0soleil View Post
The Alderman has been visiting condo association meetings in the South Loop (she was at my building last week, but I was out of town). Sent an email and got a reply (I assume from staff) that my pro-density (hey, taller, more density = more taxes) and anti-parking seems to be in minority.

I'll be there tomorrow also. I think if each of us makes 1 simple, clear point, it'll be more powerful.

- I'm going to push for lower parking / ratio due to the fact that it creates traffic (and from the point of a view of a condo owner across the street... and also lower parking ratio & no balconies will make it impossible to do a condo conversion. Let's help the selfish people see what is in their own best interests.)

- Can someone point out that these buildings will be ~30+ stories no matter what so will block views as is... best to then get them as tall and skinny as possible and create as much additional tax revenue as possible (it's ~$50k of taxes / floor. 10 floors = $500k! So chopping a few floors while still blocking view doesn't make anyone better off. It makes us worse off.)

- Can someone else then mention that these 1 bedrooms / studios will not have any children with them, so don't actually add to the school burden (but do add taxes.) (might need to be the same person if there aren't enough of us.) (some idiot will ask how this will affect "our over crowded schools")

- Someone else should just say that they support these rental developments as they make the neighborhood better for businesses in the area (which is what gives the PDNA $$) and makes the neighborhood more vibrant, and makes the neighborhood more valuable. And that the silent majority (most of the thousands who live in the area aren't here, but working hard to pay the cities taxes) probably also support (chime in the clapping! =)


Only thing I might stay away from are arguments that present rental as being superior to condo - or vice versa, for that matter. Fact is that markets, cycles shift, and can shift dramatically, and can in a relatively short period of time......I believe that 18-24 months from now, the solid majority of larger, active proposals (in the aldermanic pandering stage - known in some circles as the 'community hearing' stage') will be condo as opposed to rental.......
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.

Last edited by SamInTheLoop; Oct 20, 2015 at 5:47 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1171  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2015, 5:29 PM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,543
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrandonJXN View Post
Am I the only one who thinks that 200 N. Michigan should've been at least 20 stories taller? It's far from an ugly building. Just needs a bit more.

I can confidently assure you that you're not the only one....
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1172  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2015, 5:38 PM
trvlr70 trvlr70 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: usa
Posts: 2,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamInTheLoop View Post
I can confidently assure you that you're not the only one....
It really does look small when you don't even clear the tops of the Illinois Center buildings. Good grief!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1173  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2015, 5:38 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is online now
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 29,732
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrandonJXN View Post
Am I the only one who thinks that 200 N. Michigan should've been at least 20 stories taller? It's far from an ugly building. Just needs a bit more.
tell it to alderman reilly, i believe he demanded a modest height reduction on this one in exchange for his aldermanic blessing.
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a great middle ground for many middle class families.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1174  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2015, 5:54 PM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,543
^ Yep.....from memory, he chose to force the project to strictly adhere to its nonsensical Minimum Lot Area standard, thus reducing unit count to 402 from 432, and chopping somewhere around 3-5 floors off in the process, I believe......
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1175  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2015, 5:59 PM
harryc's Avatar
harryc harryc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Park, Il
Posts: 14,989
Quote:
Originally Posted by george View Post
Nice pics from the Open House, Harry. ^ Love that Old Republic Building, Sky-Line Club... a great perch w views. Pic from last year.

So besides providing shiny infill, and one less surface lot, the new London Guarantee extension blocks the TRUMP signage - win, win, win.
__________________
Harry C - Urbanize Chicago- My Flickr stream HRC_OakPark
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. B Franklin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1176  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2015, 6:27 PM
Kngkyle Kngkyle is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,097
Big for sale sign on the empty lot across the street from the Cadillac palace theater on Randolph.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1177  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2015, 8:40 PM
ChiHi's Avatar
ChiHi ChiHi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 172
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrandonJXN View Post
Am I the only one who thinks that 200 N. Michigan should've been at least 20 stories taller? It's far from an ugly building. Just needs a bit more.
I agree! Every time I see this building from the park I can only think about how big of a missed opportunity it was. Although a good looking building and a massive improvement for that section of Michigan its still a big missed opportunity. I think it was Reilly that made them trim it down but it wasn't that tall to start with. My only other complaint is the way it meets the restaurant next door. They didn't seem to take that into consideration at all.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1178  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2015, 8:45 PM
munchymunch's Avatar
munchymunch munchymunch is offline
MPLSXCHI
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Omicron Persei 8
Posts: 1,090
__________________
"I don't want to be interesting. I want to be good." -Ludwig Mies van der Rohe
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1179  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2015, 8:51 PM
r18tdi's Avatar
r18tdi r18tdi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,428
Core topped out at 730 W. Couch. Wish this one was closer to 400 ft, but it's still making an impact at just 320.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1180  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2015, 9:11 PM
Randomguy34's Avatar
Randomguy34 Randomguy34 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago & Philly
Posts: 2,366
Good luck to everyone attending the meeting tonight. The NIMBYs wouldn't know what hit them when they see people who live near these projects that support them. Give them hell
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:58 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.