Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin Pal
Also, perhaps you and others can answer this: While I've been searching for something on occasion...am I correct that if someone posts something and writes or links something in quotes...like this:
Quote:
Let's say I quoted a post in reference to the Motordrome and then underneath the post I wrote a lot of other information about it and had more pictures, but I didn't mention "Motordrome" at all.
|
It seems to me that if you then search for posts about Motordrome, it wouldn't search this particular post with Motordrome because it's in the "quote" section.
If that makes sense to you, am I correct about this?
|
I always use Google to search the thread, and it happily finds text in quotations (I just tested it to make sure). In fact, I think it often lists the post with the quote higher up due to it being more recent. For anyone who wants a reminder of the Google method, it's something like this:
Code:
site:forum.skyscraperpage.com noirish motordrome
For extra keywords, you can either just add them ...
Code:
site:forum.skyscraperpage.com noirish palace hotel
- should find posts/pages with Palace Hotel and Hotel Palace.
or combine them into a single term with quotes:
Code:
site:forum.skyscraperpage.com noirish "signal oil"
- will only look for
signal oil, not
signal and
oil.
It's not perfect, but it seems to be better than the forum's search feature.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin Pal
I noticed recently there was a photo postcard posted with information about a building in it that I thought I might want to look up again sometime, but the words (building name) weren't in the person's post, so if I had searched for it I wouldn't have found it. If people post things in photos, I guess I'm saying you should try to make sure, for search purposes, that the names in the photos are written in your posts somewhere, either in the title or the message. Even if you just wrote them at the end of it, like:
Motordrome, Monkey Island, Chapman Park Hotel, Catalina Sugar-Loaf--or something.
Of course, I'd rather have the posts than not at all!
Sorry for the SIDEBAR.
|
I made the same point myself a few months ago. As I said at the time, it's hard to name everything in a picture, and I know I've been guilty of not always giving a full description. I think generally, most contributors are doing a good job of naming what they post these days, and no one springs to mind as a repeat offender
.