HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2019, 2:31 AM
JohnnyRenton JohnnyRenton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 253
Maps of development in Ottawa-Gatineau from March 2004 - July 2018

A few months ago I started a project that involves mapping recent development in some of the largest cities in Canada, and some smaller ones that might be interesting, starting with Ottawa-Gatineau, the City of Vancouver, and the City of Toronto. The first one that I fully completed was for Ottawa-Gatineau so I thought I would share it here since I think it gives some pretty interesting insights into how the city developed from 2004-2018.

Before I get into the maps, a few quick notes. The data showing development was created by myself, in Google Earth Pro, with the use of Streetview for verification from time to time. The maps themselves were created in QGIS, and the rest of the data came from StatsCan, NRCan, and the City of Ottawa. While it would have been ideal to map a date range that also corresponded with census years, to really do some interesting analysis, the range I picked was ultimately decided by the availability of high quality satellite imagery that would properly allow for changes in land use and building types to be determined.

For many of the maps I will post two versions, a day time, and a night time version. They contain the same development data, but each has its own strengths in terms of what it shows. In addition to the images posted in the thread, there are also links to high resolution versions of the maps (which I encourage you to click as they allow a lot more detail to be seen).

So lets start with by looking at all the development types on a single map.





High resolution night time version.

High resolution daytime version.

There are some interesting things to point out when it comes to redevelopment in Ottawa-Gatineau. One, there is very little redevelopment taking place in Gatineau. Zibi will essentially be equal to amount of development Gatineau had seen in its central area for the past 14 years.

Two, there are some areas of Ottawa that are surprising in terms of their lack of development. Few would be surprised to see The Glebe having minimal change, but Centretown and Lowertown are equally lacking in this regard. Even the CBD area has seen tepid change, at best.

The final note is that you can quite easily see where the federal lands are, since they are the areas that have seen the least amount of redevelopment. LeBreton Flats has been pokey, while land parcels/districts like Tunney's Pasture and the Billings Bridge/Heron area have remained frozen in time, despite being in critical, desirable, central locations.

Next, let's take a closer look at greenfield development across the NCR.





High resolution night time version.

High resolution daytime version.

The total amount of greenfield land that was developed into residential and commercial properties was 36.9km2. That doesn't include roads, sidewalks, or other public right of ways. A typical city has 30-40% of its land used consumed by roads, sidewalks etc. So when you factor in those land uses, at the conservative rate of 30% land use, this means about 52.7km2 of former agricultural or natural space went to new development.

This means that for every 1 km of land that was redeveloped into a higher density use, at least 27km of greenfield space was developed.

Also of interest is how much of Gatineau's greenfield development is taking place in Aylmer and Le Plateau. And given that it is actually fairly close to the centre of Gatineau (and downtown Ottawa), and with a plan for LRT, and a surprising amount of bike lanes, you could argue that it is probably the least offensive greenfield development in the region.

The last thing I will point out is the amount of exurban development in the southern part of Ottawa, and north of the primarily residential agglomeration in Kanata. Ottawa is unique in that the city is actually primarily rural, so a lot of that development would normally take place in adjacent cities/municipalities in other metro regions in Canada. If some of the municipalities next to Gatineau had been included you would see that trend on the northern side of the Ottawa river as well (so that it is clear this is not just unique to the Ottawa portion of the NCR). So while this map does not show the full extent of the exurban trend, it is very much a factor in the amount of greenfield space which is being consumed for development.

For the next development categories, I will post each of their individual maps at once. I will also only be posting the night time versions to this post, as the minimal amount of geography they cover means the daytime versions only convey the information well in full size form (which I will include links for).



High resolution night time version.

High resolution daytime version.



High resolution night time version.

High resolution daytime version.



High resolution night time version.

High resolution daytime version.

When it comes to the education sector, there isn't much surprising here. Inside the greenbelt, development was almost exclusively post-secondary institutes expanding their campuses. Outside the greenbelt, it was the construction of new elementary and secondary schools. Of the new schools that were built in Ottawa, a majority were in the Barrhaven and Riverside areas, a testament to the amount of families who have purchased homes in that particular area.

Industrial development and relocation is something I am quite interested, and I mapped it in Ottawa to see if perhaps there were any kinds of major shifts (like what is being seen in the Toronto and Vancouver areas). I didn't really see any trends worth noting. This could change in the next 10-15 years, though I really don't see that happening as the kind of redevelopment pressures needed to push industry into new areas of the city just doesn’t seem to be there.

The last map is for big box retail redevelopment. It is worth noting that parking was not included in the area that was mapped. It was only the buildings footprint and associated outdoor spaces (like loading zones). In a future version I would like to also have a separate category for outdoor parking, as that would be interesting to see just how much land parking uses, with each associated development type, but that was not included this time around due to time constraints.

I won't go into much more detail than that right now. This is not the end of this project. As I mentioned above, I will be doing this for other cities, and I will be doing much more detailed spatial analysis within the GIS software in the future. You might notice that transit was not included on the maps. This was because I couldn't find a data set that was going to work with the analysis that I want to do in the future. So instead of adding a placeholder, just to have it, I opted not to include it until I have the exact data set I require.

A few final thoughts on development in Ottawa-Gatineau. While I was never delusional about how much suburban development is still the dominant form in the region, I was still surprised at just how extensive it was. Yes, there has been some redevelopment. But a lot of it is limited to single family homes becoming duplexes, with central neighbourhoods, like Centretown and the CBD really not growing at the rate I had expected.

I wouldn’t go so far as to say that Ottawa has failed, but more along the lines of “Ottawa hasn’t really done all that well at urban growth". The results of the past few decades of planning policies and transportation strategies are clear. Maybe LRT will start changing the equation? At the very least I suspect that the area west of Westboro, along the Ottawa River, is going to be the next redevelopment hotspot. And projects like Zibi could help add a needed spark to central Ottawa and Gatineau development. But perhaps the biggest elephant in the room are the federal lands. These are far and away the biggest opportunity for Ottawa to add more density within the greenbelt. They dont even have to be home to be 20 storey towers either. They could be mid-rises and residential blocks that have a more Reykjavik scale to them. And right now, their potential is being wasted.

And none of this is a knock against Ottawa. It is the most underrated city in Canada, and other mid-size cities are probably no more successful in terms of correcting the mistakes of half a century of auto-centric planning. And hopefully these maps help even just a handful of people really understand where Ottawa has succeeded and failed in the past 15 years so that the outcome of the next 15 years can look much, much different.

Last edited by JohnnyRenton; Jul 21, 2019 at 2:50 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2019, 10:40 AM
eltodesukane eltodesukane is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,021
z

Last edited by eltodesukane; Aug 8, 2019 at 9:04 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2019, 11:47 AM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 23,845
That is fascinating stuff. Can't wait to see other cities. Must have taken months to complete.

Just one small omission for the Education development: you din't include La Cité Collégiale projects. The main campus at 801 Aviation has added 2 or 3 buildings in that time period; the new "Excentricité" attached to "H" and "G" opened in September 2018, the extension to building "A" along the Aviation entrance was opened in 2011 if I remember correctly and building "I" was open sometime in the mid-2000s (might be just out of your time frame). La Cité Collégiale's trades campus opened at 8700 Jeanne d'Acrc (near Trim, just north of the 174) in 2010.

https://www.collegelacite.ca/campus.htm

You explained why you did not add transit lines. I was wondering if the same applied to hospital expansions?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2019, 2:38 PM
JohnnyRenton JohnnyRenton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 253
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
That is fascinating stuff. Can't wait to see other cities. Must have taken months to complete.

Just one small omission for the Education development: you din't include La Cité Collégiale projects. The main campus at 801 Aviation has added 2 or 3 buildings in that time period; the new "Excentricité" attached to "H" and "G" opened in September 2018, the extension to building "A" along the Aviation entrance was opened in 2011 if I remember correctly and building "I" was open sometime in the mid-2000s (might be just out of your time frame). La Cité Collégiale's trades campus opened at 8700 Jeanne d'Acrc (near Trim, just north of the 174) in 2010.

https://www.collegelacite.ca/campus.htm

You explained why you did not add transit lines. I was wondering if the same applied to hospital expansions?
That is a good catch with La Cité Collégiale. I will have to fix that in a upcoming revision.

I actually have much of the data in place to add hospitals. The only reason I didn't add them this time is because I couldn't find a suitable colour to represent them, one that had sufficient contrast to the rest. Keep in mind that every city uses the same symbology, and other cities have other typologies that wouldn't be seen on this map (like Vancouver and laneway housing), so the pool of colours is tricky to manage as the data grows.

It did take a while, probably a few months. Ottawa was also my testing ground if you will, and I did a lot of revisions and changes along the way, since I had to figure things out as I went. If I were to go back and do it now, I could probably do it in half the time.

There is one map completed so far for Vancouver, which shows all the laneway housing construction, which you can see by clicking here. Although the imagery used shows development from 2004 - 2018, in reality, these would have only been built from 2009 onward, the year the city changed its regulations on them. In just 9 years 3325 laneway houses were built or under construction as of July 2018. I knew they had grown, and even heard some numbers, but when you consider other factors, such as the fact that all those homes occupy a total of just 0.37 km2 of space, its becoming quite an important trend and typology for the city.

So far every city I have looked has had some real surprises in terms of development trends. The analysis part (quite a bit down the road at this point), should be super interesting as it will be a chance to actually see the effect that various planning policies, and transportation investments, have had across a variety of Canadian cities. In that regards, there is still a lot to unpack in the NCR.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2019, 3:00 PM
nortey35 nortey35 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 13
This is very cool. Is this data available? I can think of a few tools that can be used to visualize the data differently and look at it over time. Maybe having this data available and allowing public contributions will be a good idea. Great job!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2019, 3:54 PM
JohnnyRenton JohnnyRenton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 253
Quote:
Originally Posted by nortey35 View Post
This is very cool. Is this data available? I can think of a few tools that can be used to visualize the data differently and look at it over time. Maybe having this data available and allowing public contributions will be a good idea. Great job!
Thanks nortey.

I haven't decided yet if I will make the data public. If I do, it wont be right away. When I came up with the idea for this project I only knew that I wanted to track development over time, and have had to work out all the details of making it happen along the way, along with discovering trends as I went that ultimately changed how I categorized the data. So the set is still a work in progress at this moment. You are right though, there is a lot that can be done with this data. Another option would be to use Google Studio to present it in interactive maps. Though that's far less fun for me than creating classic maps, it would also be appealing to a lot of people, so if I one day have a goal of trying to give this data a wider reach, that is something I would likely do.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2019, 3:56 PM
JohnnyRenton JohnnyRenton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 253
Quote:
Originally Posted by eltodesukane View Post
"High resolution night time version." is forbidden (dead link)
Working on trying to fix that one. May have to try a different host for that file.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Jul 22, 2019, 7:17 PM
caveat.doctor's Avatar
caveat.doctor caveat.doctor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 351
Very cool work, thanks! It's fascinating to see the talent and enthusiasm in making this sort of info available on the forum.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyRenton View Post
This means that for every 1 km of land that was redeveloped into a higher density use, at least 27km of greenfield space was developed.
A nice illustrative stat. Do you know if there is a target or guideline for this, or comparable numbers for other cities? It seems to be a more useful number at conveying the increased liability for infrastructure due to greenfield development than, say, % of new units or % population growth in vs outside the Greenbelt.

Currently in the Official Plan the City sets goals for "proportion of new residential dwelling units in the urban area", but because the size of units varies (i.e., number of people per unit, area of units, etc), it doesn't seem to capture as well the ensuing resource burden associated with building on greenfields.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Jul 22, 2019, 9:03 PM
JohnnyRenton JohnnyRenton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 253
Quote:
Originally Posted by caveat.doctor View Post
Very cool work, thanks! It's fascinating to see the talent and enthusiasm in making this sort of info available on the forum.



A nice illustrative stat. Do you know if there is a target or guideline for this, or comparable numbers for other cities? It seems to be a more useful number at conveying the increased liability for infrastructure due to greenfield development than, say, % of new units or % population growth in vs outside the Greenbelt.

Currently in the Official Plan the City sets goals for "proportion of new residential dwelling units in the urban area", but because the size of units varies (i.e., number of people per unit, area of units, etc), it doesn't seem to capture as well the ensuing resource burden associated with building on greenfields.

It is not a stat I have seen before. I picked it simply because I wanted a numerical way to convey the difference in development types and it was just luck that it happened to be quite useful. I can understand why it might not be used, given that Ottawa is rather unique having city limits that essentially encompass a whole economic region. The stat would be fascinating on a GTA level, but since planning takes place across at least half a dozen cities and municipalities, there isn't necessarily any reason why they would adopt that measurement versus the traditional dwelling units or population metrics.

I do want to take a look through some of the old official plans this weekend to get a sense of what their targets were in regards to urban redevelopment vs greenfield development, as well as goals for development within transit hubs, what areas of the city they were targeting, etc. From there the next step will be analysing the data (were applicable) to see if they met these goals or not, which I will likely post in this thread as well as a follow up.

And to take it up another level, you could compare growth stats across the GVRD, Ottawa-Gatineau, and K-W/Cambridge. This could provide some interesting information on growth in economic regions of differing sizes. The GTA would be the holy grail for this kind of data, but that would be a massive undertaking, so I cant see myself doing the whole region, outside of the City of Toronto, and perhaps Mississauga (which I think would be an interesting case study).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2019, 2:41 AM
caveat.doctor's Avatar
caveat.doctor caveat.doctor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 351
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyRenton View Post
It is not a stat I have seen before. I picked it simply because I wanted a numerical way to convey the difference in development types and it was just luck that it happened to be quite useful. I can understand why it might not be used, given that Ottawa is rather unique having city limits that essentially encompass a whole economic region. The stat would be fascinating on a GTA level, but since planning takes place across at least half a dozen cities and municipalities, there isn't necessarily any reason why they would adopt that measurement versus the traditional dwelling units or population metrics.
Good point - just as you said, where there are multiple jurisdictions involved (like this analysis of the GTHA between 2001-2011), the % units or % population on greenfields is easier to track. Those seem good for giving an idea of effects that depend on the number of households/people there - like traffic, need for services like schools, etc - but not so much for things that depend on the amount of developed land, like infrastructure growth, environmental impact, etc.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyRenton View Post
I do want to take a look through some of the old official plans this weekend to get a sense of what their targets were in regards to urban redevelopment vs greenfield development, as well as goals for development within transit hubs, what areas of the city they were targeting, etc. From there the next step will be analysing the data (were applicable) to see if they met these goals or not, which I will likely post in this thread as well as a follow up.
Look forward to seeing it! Again, strong work.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:01 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.