HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


    1444 Alberni East Tower in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Vancouver Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2017, 3:45 PM
misterchill misterchill is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 11
1444 Alberni | 138M | 48FL + 43FL | Passive House | Proposed

From RENX.ca, Property Biz Canada, Evan Duggan, Oct 3 2017:

https://renx.ca/worlds-tallest-passi...ers-vancouver/

World’s tallest Passive House towers planned in Vancouver

A pair of developers are planning to build the world’s tallest Passive House structure in Vancouver.

Landa Global Properties and Asia Standard Americas have submitted a rezoning application for a two-tower rental home and condo development at 1400 Alberni Street in downtown Vancouver.

Passive House is a green building standard developed in Germany that boosts energy efficiency and comfort, and it reduces a building’s greenhouse gas emissions. There are about 1,150 Passive House buildings worldwide.

...


The two new towers in downtown Vancouver will climb to 48 and 43 storeys, respectively, and will include 450 homes, including 129 rental units, and a daycare, said Kevin Cheung, Landa’s CEO.

...

Cheung said the project was designed in partnership by New York-based Robert A.M. Stern Architects and Vancouver firm Musson Cattle Mackey Partnership.


Image from RENX.ca, Courtesy Landa/Asia Standard:
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2017, 5:06 PM
sacrifice333 sacrifice333 is offline
Vancouver User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,460
Pretty cool to see a Passive House development of that scale.

And although the design isn't overly inspiring it certainly does have a New York feel to it, partially explained by the NYC firm + Passive House requirements (i.e. substantially less glazing).
__________________
Check out TripStyler.com {locally focused travel blog} | My instagram {Travel Photos}
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2017, 7:02 PM
Feathered Friend Feathered Friend is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,188
Info from the application



Quote:
  • 314 market residential units and 129 market rental units, for a total of 443 units;
  • a total floor space ratio (FSR) of 14.95 and a floor area of 60,131 sq m (647,249 sq ft);
  • six levels of underground parking with 484 vehicle parking stalls and 562 Class A bicycle parking spaces;
  • building heights of 134.7m (442.0 ft.) (East Tower) and 123.5m (405.0 ft) (West Tower);
  • a 56 space City owned childcare facility on Level 7; and
  • closure of Nicola Street between Alberni Street and the lane to create a new City park.
Link to Appplication
http://rezoning.vancouver.ca/applica...cola/index.htm

Link to Pre-App Open House info
http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/show...ostcount=15080

Floor counts remain the same, however heights have been altered from:
West Tower 403 ft to 405 ft
East Tower 453 ft to 442 ft

The unit counts have been reduced from:
495 (362 market - 133 market rental) to
443 (314 market - 129 market rental)

FSR has been increased from:
14.71 to 14.95
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2017, 10:08 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 38,292
From VancouverMarket.ca:



http://www.vancouvermarket.ca/2017/1...in-two-towers/

I don't see a lot of amenity space in the podium plans (other than daycare):
http://rezoning.vancouver.ca/applica...FloorPlans.pdf

This is upper-mid tower:

http://www.vancouvermarket.ca/2017/1...in-two-towers/

This shows the closure of Nicola for the pocket park:


http://rezoning.vancouver.ca/applica...cola/index.htm

This shows the materials - Stone!:

http://rezoning.vancouver.ca/applica...cola/index.htm

Last edited by officedweller; Oct 4, 2017 at 10:23 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2017, 12:22 AM
dleung's Avatar
dleung dleung is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 5,966
Architect is Robert Stern? Yikes, haven't heard that name creep up since PoMo DIED.

Give this design to some regressive American city... they will be an embarrassment here
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2017, 12:53 AM
csbvan's Avatar
csbvan csbvan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,976
Yeah, PoMo surrounded by glass condos. They will stand out even more so, and I don't think in a good way.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2017, 3:04 AM
city guy city guy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 239
how can you claim something is passive house when the north and south facades of each tower are treated equally? shouldn't aspect and solar gain affect how the buildings' openings are considered?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2017, 4:00 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 38,292
It'll be shaded on all sides - i.e. small windows on all sides.

***********


I don't mind it.

Likewise, the retention of older historic buildings that vary the mix of architectural styles.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2017, 9:46 PM
BodomReaper BodomReaper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 987
I'm generally no fan of postmodernism, but the Stern-designed Water's Edge development in West Vancouver isn't the worst thing in the world (although below-par for something produced by a 'Starchitect'):




Source for both images
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2017, 10:51 PM
logan5's Avatar
logan5 logan5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mt.Pleasant
Posts: 6,856
Dleung is giving me an inferiority complex. I thought these towers were sophisticated looking. At least good enough for Vancouver.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2017, 11:34 PM
whatnext whatnext is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 22,220
Quote:
Originally Posted by logan5 View Post
Dleung is giving me an inferiority complex. I thought these towers were sophisticated looking. At least good enough for Vancouver.
The towers will be a nice counterweight to all the boring glass stuff in Vancouver.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2017, 11:53 PM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,347
Quote:
Originally Posted by dleung View Post
Architect is Robert Stern? Yikes, haven't heard that name creep up since PoMo DIED.

Give this design to some regressive American city... they will be an embarrassment here
Tate, Aquilini, Telus Garden, Peter Wall Mansion, etc are all embarrassments. We have plenty of other examples.
1444 Alberni will serve as a much needed reminder that not all residential buildings need to be grey on grey bland spandrel piles.

Last edited by vanman; Oct 6, 2017 at 12:37 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2017, 12:49 AM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,347
Robert Stern's One St Thomas in Toronto is probably one of the nicest towers in the country.


Image Credit

Last edited by vanman; Oct 6, 2017 at 1:49 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2017, 1:12 AM
csbvan's Avatar
csbvan csbvan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,976
Tbh, that's exactly what I fear.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2017, 1:18 AM
osirisboy's Avatar
osirisboy osirisboy is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,053
Love it!!! It'll look great here
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2017, 1:26 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 38,292
Local examples by Rafii are Eden and Mondrian
- although those have painted concrete exteriors.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2017, 3:15 AM
dleung's Avatar
dleung dleung is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 5,966
Quote:
Originally Posted by vanman View Post
1444 Alberni will serve as a much needed reminder that not all residential buildings need to be grey on grey bland spandrel piles.
False dichotomy. We just need to design better modern buildings. Move forward, not backward.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2017, 3:32 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,186
Quote:
Originally Posted by logan5 View Post
Dleung is giving me an inferiority complex. I thought these towers were sophisticated looking. At least good enough for Vancouver.
He's just a troll with no real knowledge of anything. I ignore anything he says most of the time.

I think these towers will look fantastic and like so many others have said, they bring something different to the very glass-heavy cityscape. Buildings of this style also age much better than modern glass towers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2017, 7:27 AM
bb1510 bb1510 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 587
I think you guys are looking at the wrong Robert Stern projects to compare this to.

Given the prices these will command, it's better to take a look at 520 Park Ave, 220 Central Park South, and 15 Central Park West in terms of interior/exterior treatments with regards to higher end Ramsa projects

I'm sure these will sell well to the demographic targeted given their desires for limestone houses in the westside
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2017, 7:50 AM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,836
Quote:
Originally Posted by logan5 View Post
Dleung is giving me an inferiority complex. I thought these towers were sophisticated looking. At least good enough for Vancouver.
I think they're sophisticated-looking and good enough for Vancouver, for what it's worth. They have a "big city" almost "New Yorkish" feeling to them, IMO.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:17 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.