HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture


    Elysian in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Chicago Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
Chicago Projects & Construction Forum

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #881  
Old Posted Jun 27, 2008, 4:12 PM
honte honte is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago - every nook and cranny
Posts: 4,628
^ It has been very common in Chicago for developers to do something similar - usually real stone at the bottom two floors and then painted cast-in-place above that. It has also been done with precast systems.

Generally, the look is even more disappointing, because the transition is noticeable. It seems to say, "We wanted to use this other stuff, but the money wasn't there."
__________________
"Every building is a landmark until proven otherwise." - Harry Mohr Weese

"I often say, 'Look, see, enjoy, and love.' It's a long way from looking to loving, but it's worth the effort." - Walter Andrew Netsch Jr.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #882  
Old Posted Jun 27, 2008, 5:26 PM
Brian.'s Avatar
Brian. Brian. is offline
mmmmkay
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 332
But with as good as the precast is for this building, it could have be done the right way I think.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #883  
Old Posted Jun 27, 2008, 6:05 PM
honte honte is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago - every nook and cranny
Posts: 4,628
^ You can always see the transition... because the natural variation in the stone is lacking in the precast. To make it really match, you'd probably be working to make the stone look more like the precast than vice-versa, and that seems counterproductive.

I think most of us have not been arguing against precast, but against the attempt to fool the eye into thinking that the precast is stone. So, this solution also seems to lead down the path further into illusion. I'd rather see the building try to identify the unique demands of precast and exploit them for a new aesthetic effect.
__________________
"Every building is a landmark until proven otherwise." - Harry Mohr Weese

"I often say, 'Look, see, enjoy, and love.' It's a long way from looking to loving, but it's worth the effort." - Walter Andrew Netsch Jr.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #884  
Old Posted Jun 27, 2008, 6:13 PM
Brian.'s Avatar
Brian. Brian. is offline
mmmmkay
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 332
If it were to work the design shouldn't be for the precast to match the stone exactly. A color or texture change would need to happen so that the precast can be precast and the stone to do what it wants to do. The materials need to compliment each other not fight against it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #885  
Old Posted Jun 27, 2008, 6:33 PM
honte honte is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago - every nook and cranny
Posts: 4,628
^ Definitely agree with that.
__________________
"Every building is a landmark until proven otherwise." - Harry Mohr Weese

"I often say, 'Look, see, enjoy, and love.' It's a long way from looking to loving, but it's worth the effort." - Walter Andrew Netsch Jr.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #886  
Old Posted Jun 27, 2008, 9:12 PM
wrab's Avatar
wrab wrab is offline
Deerhoof Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,670
Quote:
Originally Posted by honte View Post
.....I think most of us have not been arguing against precast, but against the attempt to fool the eye into thinking that the precast is stone. So, this solution also seems to lead down the path further into illusion. I'd rather see the building try to identify the unique demands of precast and exploit them for a new aesthetic effect.
Absolutely - precast is an excellent cladding material with its own interesting & exploitable qualities.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #887  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2008, 3:24 AM
Chicagoguy Chicagoguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 667
The more I think about this building the more I think it might be just in the wrong location. It would look really nice in Lincoln Park I think. More the style for Lincoln Park I think
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #888  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2008, 5:23 PM
wrab's Avatar
wrab wrab is offline
Deerhoof Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,670
Ah, but Lincoln Park is already getting one of its own:


http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=128596
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #889  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2008, 6:46 PM
Chicagoguy Chicagoguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 667
I know and I love Lincoln Park 2520, but just imagine how great these would look next to each other. Would create a much needed change for Lincoln Park. I am excited to watch Lincoln Park become the Luxury Neighborhood it used to be. Its about time they made it start to look more like central park in NY.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #890  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2008, 6:51 PM
Nowhereman1280 Nowhereman1280 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pungent Onion, Illinois
Posts: 8,492
^^^ What are you talking about? Lincoln Park still is a luxury neighborhood... The only neighborhood more "luxury" than it is the Gold Coast, which is directly adjacent to it to the south... If Lincoln Park is not luxury, then 90% of Chicago is slums...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #891  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2008, 6:56 PM
Chicagoguy Chicagoguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 667
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nowhereman1280 View Post
^^^ What are you talking about? Lincoln Park still is a luxury neighborhood... The only neighborhood more "luxury" than it is the Gold Coast, which is directly adjacent to it to the south... If Lincoln Park is not luxury, then 90% of Chicago is slums...
I wasnt saying that is isnt Luxury, but nothing like Lincoln Park 2520 has been on the market in Lincoln Park for a long time. Prices in Lincoln Park 2520 are similar to that of the prices in the Spire. Thats all I meant is more Ultra Luxury places like this should be built! The Gold Coast is getting a little full...so multi millionaires will hopefully move to the Park next
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #892  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2008, 7:30 AM
Nowhereman1280 Nowhereman1280 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pungent Onion, Illinois
Posts: 8,492
^^^ Oh, my bad, but you should say nothing new of this caliber has been on the market recently.


BALCONY RAILING:



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #893  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2008, 11:33 AM
andydie's Avatar
andydie andydie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Hannover, Germany
Posts: 588
Smile

surely better than the ones Aqua is getting.

PS: Nice Update Nowhereman1280
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #894  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2008, 11:55 AM
erbsenzaehler's Avatar
erbsenzaehler erbsenzaehler is offline
Teutonic Barbar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: East German Provincekaff
Posts: 43
Thanks for the update! Looks fine so far. Those balconies don't try to imitate something, yet they look pretty classy.
What about the condo status? Did they already manage to rent everything?

Btw: Lincoln Park 2520 looks great. Another fine Lucien Lagrange composition that really compliments Chicagos' classical skyscraper architecture.
Just take a look at the video on its homepage! It may seem pretty nouveau-riche, but... who cares? I'd move there in a minute, if they'd build it over here in Neubrandenburg

Last edited by erbsenzaehler; Jun 29, 2008 at 12:10 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #895  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2008, 10:08 PM
scalziand's Avatar
scalziand scalziand is offline
Mortaaaaaaaaar!
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Naugatuck, CT/Worcester,MA
Posts: 3,506
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrabbit View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by honte View Post
...I think most of us have not been arguing against precast, but against the attempt to fool the eye into thinking that the precast is stone. So, this solution also seems to lead down the path further into illusion. I'd rather see the building try to identify the unique demands of precast and exploit them for a new aesthetic effect.
Absolutely - precast is an excellent cladding material with its own interesting & exploitable qualities.
I definitely agree with this. I see the sculptural possibilities that Precast has, unique from other materials currently available.
In order to allow precast to mature as a facade material, the architects need to look at it as a new material, not as a facsimile of wood, brick, or stone. They need to have the guts to say 'yes, this is a new(ish) material, and we are going to treat it as such.'

sorry if I repeated myself a bit.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #896  
Old Posted Jul 1, 2008, 12:00 AM
simcityaustin's Avatar
simcityaustin simcityaustin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Atlanta/Chicago
Posts: 408
Taken last weekend: (Unedited)

__________________
University of Iowa! Go Hawkeyes!
No, I think I'll just go down and have some pudding and wait for it all to turn up.... It always does in the end. ~ Luna Lovegood
Chi-town fan!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #897  
Old Posted Jul 1, 2008, 1:59 AM
museumparktom museumparktom is offline
Chicagotom SSC
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 438
Quote:
Originally Posted by andydie View Post
surely better than the ones Aqua is getting.

PS: Nice Update Nowhereman1280
I thought the same thing - Nice balconies railings. Aqua's are such a letdown. These are just flat out high end. Nice detail touch with edge of the balcony painted black as well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #898  
Old Posted Jul 1, 2008, 4:36 PM
APPRAISER APPRAISER is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 258
This might be a stupid question to some, but how do they attach the precast sections to the building? Concrete, bolts, glue ....???
I'm not very familiar with precast work on high rises.

Thanks!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #899  
Old Posted Jul 1, 2008, 5:25 PM
Brian.'s Avatar
Brian. Brian. is offline
mmmmkay
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 332
OOOO...OOOOO...PICK ME!

Welded or bolted are the current most used methods. Welding sometimes doesn't work well when the building needs to "breathe". Bolted connections can be designed to let the building expand and contract as it needs to. The section below shows how we most typically hang a spandrel off of a column.



I did notice in this picture then they will be hanging the small pieces off of the tube steel that that was welded on to the vertical precast piece. I have circled it in the pic for you. I will look back at the rest of the thread when I get a chance to see if any other pics will show me what they are using for this project.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #900  
Old Posted Jul 1, 2008, 7:25 PM
HighRiser HighRiser is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 14
While always short on time to get involved in some big discussion, I will leave a few points of interest for you all to ponder. From the time a residential building starts to the time it is finished it is all about money. You could design a 700 foot building with stone,cast iron and all the old crafted ways of the turn of the century. Craftsmenship would be remarkable people would be envious of the wealthy buyers. As years go by and the building ages through the seasons and warranty items expire, maintenance will have to be done. Buildings owned by large corporations come to mind Tribune tower, Standard Oil, Channel 7 news building, you get the point, whos going to pay 10 20 30 million plus facade maintenance? Why of course the condo owners and their assessment fees. Now just use that one example of thinking and plug it into about 30 posts on this forumn and now you will know why things are built the way they are built.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:46 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.