HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #201  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2020, 2:35 PM
pspeid's Avatar
pspeid pspeid is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,734
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Jabroni View Post
Mix it up with Black and Yellow paint scheme for BLM, and you'd have all the triggered idiots who were pro-closed, wanting to tear those barriers down in no time!

Let's do it!! LET'S GOOOOO!!!!!


Seeing how good that new barrier-free portion of P & M looks, I wouldn't be surprised if the barricades eventually die the "death of a thousand cuts". As I understand it, remedial work needs to be done on the moisture barrier under the other three corners (and, I guess, still under the Richardson Building corner). Add the future need for some rapid transit stops, and at some point I can imagine the barriers simply being gone and the issue just fading away.
__________________
"Opinion is really the lowest form of intelligence"-Bill Bullard

"Naysayers are always predicting the present"-Anon.

"Rudeness is the weak man's imitation of strength"-Eric Hoffer
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #202  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2020, 7:09 PM
Luisito's Avatar
Luisito Luisito is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,792
Quote:
Originally Posted by pspeid View Post


Seeing how good that new barrier-free portion of P & M looks, I wouldn't be surprised if the barricades eventually die the "death of a thousand cuts". As I understand it, remedial work needs to be done on the moisture barrier under the other three corners (and, I guess, still under the Richardson Building corner). Add the future need for some rapid transit stops, and at some point I can imagine the barriers simply being gone and the issue just fading away.
That will take too long......I think Jabronis plan of triggering some one to ram the barricades down is better. lol
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #203  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2020, 3:17 PM
joshlemer joshlemer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 148
Quote:
Originally Posted by buzzg View Post

What's with these prickly ramp things?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #204  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2020, 3:21 PM
joshlemer joshlemer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 148


^ couple weeks back
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #205  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2020, 3:33 PM
bussche bussche is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by joshlemer View Post
What's with these prickly ramp things?
The ramps are just decorative parts of the benches. The prickly bits are to stop skateboarders.

When they were building this my first thought was "Is this a level from Tony Hawk Pro Skater?"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #206  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2020, 3:40 PM
pspeid's Avatar
pspeid pspeid is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,734
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luisito View Post
That will take too long......I think Jabronis plan of triggering some one to ram the barricades down is better. lol
Works for me!
__________________
"Opinion is really the lowest form of intelligence"-Bill Bullard

"Naysayers are always predicting the present"-Anon.

"Rudeness is the weak man's imitation of strength"-Eric Hoffer
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #207  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2020, 5:01 PM
buzzg buzzg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 7,799
Trees planted in the new beds along Main yesterday, really nice to see there's quite a few. Definitely just going to be putting concrete blocks over it like new standard is. Will be interesting to see if they even bother putting planters at the fully open part by the corner.

It's sad/dumb to me that on this busy stretch of Main we can put lots of trees in along the road, yet when Fort was just completely rebuilt it was kept as 4 lanes without a single tree. This city is a joke.

Side note, I reallllly wonder if Richardson has plans to open the tower up more... seems odd to put dozens of benches around the building when nothing opens to it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #208  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2020, 5:06 PM
Kris22 Kris22 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 600
Quote:
Originally Posted by bussche View Post
The ramps are just decorative parts of the benches. The prickly bits are to stop skateboarders.

When they were building this my first thought was "Is this a level from Tony Hawk Pro Skater?"
This misses the mark entirely as far as good design is concerned. Why make something that looks like a functional ramp, that does not function as a ramp, and that can't be sit on comfortably as a bench due to the slope and the low height from the ground? But oh wait, it looks like a skateboarding set up so lets put some metal blobs to make sure it is 100% nonfunctional. In which case it becomes a sculptural element of the design, which is even worse because it's a concrete ramp with metal blobs and not even attractive or artistic in anyway. Sorry if this is coming across as over-critical but I just don't understand how these designers make it through school with these utterly pointless design projects.

But ya, let's get P&M open already!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #209  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2020, 5:13 PM
buzzg buzzg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 7,799
^And the funny part is they didn't put anything bumps on the edges, so they're perfectly designed for grinding.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #210  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2020, 5:46 PM
Kris22 Kris22 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 600
^They should have added a contemporary, non-functional staircase to no where on the other end of the bench, then roped it off due to it being unusable and hazardous.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #211  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2020, 8:12 PM
trueviking's Avatar
trueviking trueviking is offline
surely you agree with me
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 13,458
Apparently the concept for the rapid transit station at Portage and Main is to remove two lanes from Portage East. It might even be closed to vehicle traffic completely. It will be totally above ground. The line on the elevated track behind union station will come back to ground near there. If you look at the sketch of union station it kind of shows something similar.

So. It will definitely be stupid to have the intersection closed with that on one corner. Transit will definitely want it closed though because it will make buses faster. They were opposed to opening it during the vote as you’ll recall. They wanted dozens of new buses and a new building to store them in to compensate for the drastic gridlock they would endure.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #212  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2020, 11:32 PM
Wpg_Guy's Avatar
Wpg_Guy Wpg_Guy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Posts: 5,482
Quote:
Originally Posted by buzzg View Post

It's sad/dumb to me that on this busy stretch of Main we can put lots of trees in along the road, yet when Fort was just completely rebuilt it was kept as 4 lanes without a single tree. This city is a joke.
That's the difference between engineering a street and designing one.
__________________
Winnipeg Act II - April 2024

In The Future Every Building Will Be World-Famous For Fifteen Minutes.

Instagram
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #213  
Old Posted Oct 26, 2020, 12:15 AM
ue ue is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,480
Quote:
Originally Posted by trueviking View Post
Apparently the concept for the rapid transit station at Portage and Main is to remove two lanes from Portage East. It might even be closed to vehicle traffic completely. It will be totally above ground. The line on the elevated track behind union station will come back to ground near there. If you look at the sketch of union station it kind of shows something similar.

So. It will definitely be stupid to have the intersection closed with that on one corner. Transit will definitely want it closed though because it will make buses faster. They were opposed to opening it during the vote as you’ll recall. They wanted dozens of new buses and a new building to store them in to compensate for the drastic gridlock they would endure.
I simply don’t understand the logic of needing Portage and Main closed to pedestrians. Yes, it helps facilitate vehicular traffic I suppose, but Winnipeg isn’t that busy and there are far busier cities with important downtown or other nodal crossings and... pedestrians still cross. Think Yonge-Bloor and Queen-Spadina in Toronto or Broadway-Cambie in Vancouver. Maybe by making it more convenient to walk and make the city more accessible by other means there won’t even be the same vehicular traffic.

I do admit the Portage East elevated station is enticing and more ‘big city’ than I’d expect, but that level of infrastructure really just points to how this should just be built as light rail. Do you know where heading west down Portage or north down Main the RT line is supposed to be at ground level? They could in theory have the elevated crossing continue over the intersection, although that would be a lot messier than just burying it. But it would reduce any potential congestion issues.

Or maybe close Portage & Main to vehicular traffic if they’re on Portage and turning south on Main or on Main northbound and turning left on Portage. Would reduce congestion as that crossing can be done via Broadway.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #214  
Old Posted Oct 26, 2020, 12:50 AM
Wigglez's Avatar
Wigglez Wigglez is offline
Source?
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 662
Quote:
Originally Posted by trueviking View Post
Apparently the concept for the rapid transit station at Portage and Main is to remove two lanes from Portage East. It might even be closed to vehicle traffic completely. It will be totally above ground. The line on the elevated track behind union station will come back to ground near there. If you look at the sketch of union station it kind of shows something similar.

So. It will definitely be stupid to have the intersection closed with that on one corner. Transit will definitely want it closed though because it will make buses faster. They were opposed to opening it during the vote as you’ll recall. They wanted dozens of new buses and a new building to store them in to compensate for the drastic gridlock they would endure.
Oh I very much recall... When their union rep on twitter said they won't be responsible for the people they run over if its opened (this isn't a joke - they actually said they wouldn't be responsible for running down pedestrians in busses if P&M opens - they deleted it soon after but I'll never forget the mindset of our transit)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #215  
Old Posted Oct 26, 2020, 3:07 AM
trueviking's Avatar
trueviking trueviking is offline
surely you agree with me
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 13,458
Ha! I forgot about that. Oh man.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #216  
Old Posted Oct 26, 2020, 3:49 AM
GarryEllice's Avatar
GarryEllice GarryEllice is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 544
Quote:
Originally Posted by ue View Post
I do admit the Portage East elevated station is enticing and more ‘big city’ than I’d expect, but that level of infrastructure really just points to how this should just be built as light rail. Do you know where heading west down Portage or north down Main the RT line is supposed to be at ground level? They could in theory have the elevated crossing continue over the intersection, although that would be a lot messier than just burying it. But it would reduce any potential congestion issues.
I think trueviking meant "above ground" in the sense of "not underground", rather than in the sense of "elevated"?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #217  
Old Posted Oct 26, 2020, 6:29 AM
EspionNoir's Avatar
EspionNoir EspionNoir is offline
Winnipeg
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 635
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wigglez View Post
Oh I very much recall... When their union rep on twitter said they won't be responsible for the people they run over if its opened (this isn't a joke - they actually said they wouldn't be responsible for running down pedestrians in busses if P&M opens - they deleted it soon after but I'll never forget the mindset of our transit)
Wow, that’s rather...brutal I’d say? I don’t even know the right word to describe it. I guess they are trying to show their commitment to be punctual....? It’s just so shocking. I highly doubt there are legislations or regulations that give them the power to be no responsible for it.
__________________
Winnipeg
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #218  
Old Posted Oct 26, 2020, 8:33 AM
bomberjet bomberjet is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 13,782
People do crazy things. I saw a person get hit at Graham snd Fort last year. They just ran out in front of the bus. Out of nowhere. So I get their point. But ya, pretty dramatic.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #219  
Old Posted Oct 26, 2020, 12:27 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by EspionNoir View Post
Wow, that’s rather...brutal I’d say? I don’t even know the right word to describe it. I guess they are trying to show their commitment to be punctual....? It’s just so shocking. I highly doubt there are legislations or regulations that give them the power to be no responsible for it.
I suppose on one level they're just trying to do their jobs... to make sure the buses run on time. But perhaps an organization like Transit with one singular focus shouldn't be allowed to call the shots for something that touches on a lot of different issues, much the same way that we don't let other individual departments call all the shots for all of government.

It seems to me that Portage and Main would be best handled as a planning exercise where all of the needs of the different users such as drivers, cyclists, pedestrians, transit, utilities and businesses are taken into account.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #220  
Old Posted Oct 26, 2020, 2:20 PM
buzzg buzzg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 7,799
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wpg_Guy View Post
That's the difference between engineering a street and designing one.
Ya, it's ridiculous that this is happening downtown of all places. It's like how Hydro seems to be in charge of making street light design choices now – hence why on Graham we have the 90s black transit design, mixed with SHED, mixed with now unpainted modular crap at the east end.

I really like the black design, but if we're going to be replacing everything, I wish the polished steel SHED design would be carried throughout Graham. Fort got polished street lights, and one block of Donald... I just don't understand how every "project" in the area ends up looking different.


Quote:
Originally Posted by trueviking View Post
Apparently the concept for the rapid transit station at Portage and Main is to remove two lanes from Portage East. It might even be closed to vehicle traffic completely. It will be totally above ground. The line on the elevated track behind union station will come back to ground near there. If you look at the sketch of union station it kind of shows something similar.
Can't see it being completely closed with the Fairmont access there...

Quote:
Originally Posted by ue View Post

I do admit the Portage East elevated station is enticing and more ‘big city’ than I’d expect, but that level of infrastructure really just points to how this should just be built as light rail. Do you know where heading west down Portage or north down Main the RT line is supposed to be at ground level? They could in theory have the elevated crossing continue over the intersection, although that would be a lot messier than just burying it. But it would reduce any potential congestion issues.
It sounds like Portage would be on one side (likely north side) through downtown, then switch to centre median west from around U of W. Main street will be on the east side.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:36 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.