Quote:
Originally Posted by Wpg_Guy
That's the difference between engineering a street and designing one.
|
Ya, it's ridiculous that this is happening downtown of all places. It's like how Hydro seems to be in charge of making street light design choices now – hence why on Graham we have the 90s black transit design, mixed with SHED, mixed with now unpainted modular crap at the east end.
I really like the black design, but if we're going to be replacing everything, I wish the polished steel SHED design would be carried throughout Graham. Fort got polished street lights, and one block of Donald... I just don't understand how every "project" in the area ends up looking different.
Quote:
Originally Posted by trueviking
Apparently the concept for the rapid transit station at Portage and Main is to remove two lanes from Portage East. It might even be closed to vehicle traffic completely. It will be totally above ground. The line on the elevated track behind union station will come back to ground near there. If you look at the sketch of union station it kind of shows something similar.
|
Can't see it being
completely closed with the Fairmont access there...
Quote:
Originally Posted by ue
I do admit the Portage East elevated station is enticing and more ‘big city’ than I’d expect, but that level of infrastructure really just points to how this should just be built as light rail. Do you know where heading west down Portage or north down Main the RT line is supposed to be at ground level? They could in theory have the elevated crossing continue over the intersection, although that would be a lot messier than just burying it. But it would reduce any potential congestion issues.
|
It sounds like Portage would be on one side (likely north side) through downtown, then switch to centre median west from around U of W. Main street will be on the east side.