I'm not trying to be partisan, I'm not interested in scoring cheap political points. I am reacting to a situation that was inappropriately handled from the start in a way that was objectively obvious for all to see that were paying attention. And will result in major real-world consequence of needless lives lost. However, as to your points:
Blaming China. Seems like deflection, but at least you're not blaming Obama for the lack of response, like the president. This is why I mentioned HEB. Maybe you haven't read the Texas Monthly article about their preparations. I will include some excerpts here.
Quote:
On January 15, Wuhan’s Municipal Health Commission announced that the novel coronavirus was spreading via human-to-human transmission.
Justen Noakes: So when did we start looking at the coronavirus? Probably the second week in January, when it started popping up in China as an issue. We’ve got interests in the global sourcing world, and we started getting reports on how it was impacting things in China, so we started watching it closely at that point. We decided to take a harder look at how to implement the plan we developed in 2009 into a tabletop exercise. On February 2, we dusted it off and compared the plan we had versus what we were seeing in China, and started working on step one pretty heavily.
Craig Boyan: Starting in January, we’ve been in close contact with several retailers and suppliers around the world. As this has started to emerge, we’ve been in close contact with retailers in China, starting with what happened in Wuhan in the early couple of months, and what kind of lessons they learned. Over the last couple of months, [we’ve been] in close contact with some of our Italian retailers and suppliers, understanding how things have evolved in Italy and now in Spain, talking to those countries that are ahead of us in the curve. We’ve been in daily contact, understanding the pace and the change and the need for product, and how things have progressed in each of those countries.
Justen Noakes: We modeled what had been taking place in China from a transmission perspective, as well as impact. As the number of illnesses and the number of deaths were increasing, obviously the Chinese government was taking some steps to protect their citizens, so we basically mirrored what that might look like. We also took an approach to what we saw during H1N1 in 2009, and later got on top of it. Our example was if we were to get an outbreak, specifically in the Houston area, how would we manage that, and how would we respond with our current resources, as well as what resource opportunities would we have.
Craig Boyan: Chinese retailers have sent some pretty thorough information about what happened in the early days of the outbreak: how did that affect grocery and retail, how did that affect employees and how people were addressing sanitization and social distancing, how quarantine has affected the supply chain, how shopping behavior changed as the virus progressed, how did companies work to serve communities with total lockdowns, and what action steps those businesses wish they had done early in the cycle to get ahead of it.
|
So, if HEB was able to see the situation for what it was in China, and communicate with the Chinese about best practices and realistic outcomes, why wasn't the government?
The WHO offered the US testing kits. The US declined those kits. Testing per capita remains far below South Korea (who seem to have no problem acquiring kits), one of the only countries to successfully slow the spread of disease. Testing the asymptomatic, vital for control, continues not to happen.
Mentioning the leaders of New York's action, or lack thereof, in response to my criticism of the federal reaction (the real leaders of this entire country) again smacks of deflection.