Quote:
Originally Posted by Handro
This project has more potential to become a dead zone, visited only by people bussed in from the suburbs or outer neighborhoods and then bussed straight back, than it does to become a little island of Vegas nightlife on the river. It’s a pointless location for a hotel but for people staying specifically for the casino—and who is making an overnight trip to Chicago to gamble? I’m afraid we have enough evidence of the economic gravity of casinos in Chicagoland to become naively hopeful for this to be anything but a streetside wasteland.
How is the Medinah temple casino doing, in a beautiful, approachable building, in a bustling tourist district?
|
I think your last point is an interesting question. While foot traffic helps and works in gambling meccas like Vegas, I'm not sure a city-based casino like in Chicago would benefit the same way.
This is totally me guessing, but I'd imagine casinos that have less to do around them (virtually all of the region in the area I can think of) probably fare better because once people are inside they're less inclined to leave. There's a lot more to draw you out of Medinah (food, for instance) than there will be at the Tribune site.
Downtown foot traffic might get you a few new player, but I don't imagine that may "for curiosity" walk-ins are staying as long as regular casino-goers.
Also, I hope thing thing looks 10x better than the Hard Rock in Rockford. See it often on the way to my in-laws and it's dreadful.